Define Phase

Act as a UX researcher. Cluster raw feedback into 5 themes. Format: [Theme | Supporting Quotes | Frequency]. Data: {{paste feedback}}

Extract 7 pain points from transcript. Output: [Pain Point | Evidence | Emotional Impact]. Transcript: {{paste}}

Create a persona from these details: {{insert data}}. Include: Background, Goals, Motivations, Frustrations, Quotes.

Compare these 2 personas: {{Persona A}} vs {{Persona B}}. Output: [Similarities | Differences | Design Implications].

Convert this user story: {{insert input}} → 3 Jobs To Be Done: “When I… I want to… So I can…”

Create 5 variations of JTBD statements for this scenario: {{insert}}

Build an empathy map for persona {{insert}}. Structure: Think/Feel, See, Say/Do, Pains, Gains.

Rewrite challenge {{draft}} into user-centered statements. Format: “Users struggle with X because Y. This impacts Z.”

From these 10 insights, prioritize top 3 using [Impact | Frequency | Feasibility]. Output table. Insights: {{list}}

Map journey for first-time {{user type}} using {{product}}. Output: [Stage | Action | Emotion | Pain | Opportunity].

Provide 3 alternative journeys for task {{task}}. Highlight differences in effort, friction, delight.

Synthesize these stakeholder goals into 5 design priorities. Format: [Priority | User Impact | Business Value]. Data: {{insert}}

Based on {{problem}}, generate 3 UX hypotheses: “If users X, then Y happens, because Z.”

Evaluate these 3 hypotheses for [Testability | Risk | Value]. Rank 1–5.

Extract usability issues from notes. Output: [Issue | Severity (1–5) | Quote]. Notes: {{insert}}

Apply Nielsen’s heuristics to {{screen/product}}. Output 10 checkpoints with pass/fail.

Act as an accessibility expert. Identify 5 accessibility issues with {{screen/app}}. Suggest improvements.

Summarize survey responses into [Theme | % Mentioned | Example Quote]. Data: {{paste}}

Analyze tone of user feedback. Output: [Positive Themes | Negative Themes | Neutral].

Compare how users describe {{Competitor A}} vs {{Competitor B}}. Format: [Perception Dimension | Brand A | Brand B].

Identify 5 UX trends relevant to {{industry}} from provided articles. Output: [Trend | Relevance | Example].

Perform a cognitive walkthrough of {{task}}. Output steps with: [Action | User Thought | Potential Confusion].

Sort features into Kano categories: Must-Have, Performance, Delighter. Data: {{features}}

Extract 5 impactful quotes from transcript. Provide context for each.

You are {{persona}}. Walk through {{scenario}}. Describe confusion, delight, frustrations.

Apply “5 Whys” to this problem: {{insert}}. Output layered root causes.

Generate 10 stakeholder questions to clarify scope of {{project}}.

Compare {{app}} to industry benchmark. Output: [Benchmark | App Rating | Gap].

Identify 5 UX risks in implementing {{feature}}. Output: [Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation].

Based on insights {{insert}}, generate 5 opportunity areas. Format: [Opportunity | Evidence | Potential Solution].

Highlight journey breakdowns in checkout flow {{flow}}. Provide fixes.

Compare user Jobs vs Stated Goals for {{persona}}. Output: [Job | Goal | Gap].

Analyze current workflow of {{task}}. Highlight inefficiencies. Output: [Step | Issue | Suggested Fix].

From diary study entries, extract patterns. Output: [Behavior | Frequency | Implication].

Perform SWOT on competitor {{X}} UX. Output: Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat.

Summarize raw notes into 1-page debrief. Sections: Key Insights, Surprises, Next Steps. Notes: {{insert}}

Identify gaps between current UX vs ideal UX for {{flow}}. Output: [Current | Ideal | Gap | Idea].

Break down {{task}} into user sub-tasks. Output: [Sub-task | Goal | Friction].