Problem Context :
A significant portion of our website visitors come with specific health or wellness concerns but often struggle to find the right product. Our current product discovery relies heavily on manual browsing or keyword-based search, which only matches terms from product descriptions, ingredients, or listed benefits.
However, users typically search or think in natural, conversational language — for example:
"Mujhe gastric issue hai" "My skin is tanned, suggest me something" "Which syrup is best for immunity?" Our existing system fails to understand such queries, leading to zero search results, confusion, and higher drop-offs — especially from first-time users unfamiliar with Ayurveda.
To address this, we’re exploring AI-first conversational tools that not only instantly resolve user questions but also guide them to purchase by providing personalized product recommendations, checkout flows within chat, and continuous learning to improve responses over time.
Customer PainPoints :
Lack of Guided Discovery
Users often don’t know what product to look for. They come with specific concerns ("hair fall after pregnancy", "acidity during sleep") but struggle to find relevant solutions due to the absence of a guided, symptom-based journey.
Search Doesn’t Understand Natural Language
Our keyword-based search engine doesn’t recognize real-world phrases like “mujhe gastric issue hai” or “my skin feels dull”. This results in either irrelevant suggestions or zero results, frustrating users.
Lack of Instant Support
Many high-intent users abandon the session when they don’t get quick answers. Waiting for a human response or having to dig through FAQs increases bounce rates.
Language & Accessibility Gaps
A large portion of our audience prefers Hindi or regional languages. The absence of vernacular support creates a disconnect and excludes users who might otherwise convert.
Trust Gap in Choosing the Right Product
Without contextual explanation or personalized recommendations, users may hesitate to buy — fearing side effects, dosage confusion, or product mismatch.
Limechat - Status Quo
First response time, wait time currently for customer is 2.5 Hrs - source Limechat dashboard
March 14 to April 14
Comparison
Current metrics
Recommendation & Questions in front of us
Based on the current analysis and real-world performance data, Verifast.ai is better aligned with our immediate goals of improving product discovery, enabling natural language interactions, and driving faster, AI-led conversions on our website.
Verifast has demonstrated:
Strong support for vernacular and natural language queries High engagement with 63% of users interacting meaningfully Solid performance with a 16% chat-to-cart rate Low human handoff (1.6%), showing maturity in query handling can answer user queries on their order details e.t.c LimeChat brings strength in WhatsApp automation. However, for our business context — where users need in-the-moment guidance during product discovery — verifast holds good.
Should we keep limechat & verifast both in website?
or
we should experiment by keeping only verifast and taking limechat off the website & see how it goes?
time taken to response on Limechat AI vs Verifast AI
25-40 seconds
3-6 seconds