Skip to content
Insights May-Aug2025
Collective Insights from Action Group Basecamp Projects*
Key Knowledge, Key Strategies, Key Tactics
CommunitiesRising All
18May2025
No Kings, Day of Defiance 14June2025
Could we gather as a group at this rally and post a sign like this?
Red Square Sign? 97.3 KB View full-size Download
We would then have with folks. Some questions we might ask:
Your Thoughts for June 14th?
(excerpts)
“We, the people” must use Trump's corruption as motivation to redeem democracy from the stranglehold of billionaires and corporations. We must reform the DOJ, FBI, and Congress. We must overturn the corrupt decisions of the Supreme Court that grant presidents criminal immunity and allow corporations to buy elections and politicians. We will accomplish those reforms at the ballot box, in the streets, in living rooms, and in school auditoriums. Fully redeeming our democracy will be a long-term, arduous task. We have already begun the work and have reason for hope. The daily reports of corruption and lawlessness are difficult to stomach, but we must use them as a source of righteous indignation and courage for the battles to come. Stay strong and know that we are in this fight together. Trump did not weaken the guardrails of democracy on his own. He has been enabled and assisted by a corps of cultural war shock troops who believe in white supremacy, Christian nationalism, and antisemitism. But he has not corrupted us—the people. To be sure, he has gained control of about one-third of the electorate. But it is not enough—or should not be enough—to halt the rebirth and reformation that has already begun. I wish there were a better, easier answer than saying that years of protesting in the streets and showing up at town halls and ballot boxes will be needed to get us out of this mess. But here we are. The only question is, “What are we going to do about it?” For me, the answer is, “Exactly what we have been doing, only louder, more frequently, and in greater numbers.”
, Levitsky, Way & Ziblatt
Authoritarianism is harder to recognize than it used to be. Most 21st-century autocrats are elected. ...
We call this — a system in which parties compete in elections but the systematic abuse of an incumbent’s power tilts the playing field against the opposition.
The descent into competitive authoritarianism doesn’t always set off alarms. Because governments attack their rivals through nominally legal means like defamation suits, tax audits and politically targeted investigations, citizens are often slow to realize they are succumbing to authoritarian rule.
Under authoritarianism, by contrast, opposition comes with a price. Citizens and organizations that run afoul of the government become targets of a range of punitive measures: Politicians may be investigated and prosecuted on baseless or petty charges, media outlets may be hit with frivolous defamation suits or adverse regulatory rulings, businesses may face tax audits or be denied critical contracts or licenses, universities and other civic institutions may lose essential funding or tax-exempt status, and journalists, activists and other critics may be harassed, threatened or physically attacked by government supporters.
When citizens must think twice about criticizing or opposing the government because they could credibly face government retribution, they no longer live in a full democracy.
By that measure, America has crossed the line into competitive authoritarianism. The Trump administration’s weaponization of government agencies and flurry of punitive actions against critics has raised the cost of opposition for a wide range of Americans.
For many American citizens and organizations, then, the cost of opposition has risen markedly. Although these costs are not as high as in dictatorships like Russia — where critics are routinely imprisoned, exiled or killed — America has, with stunning speed, descended into a world in which opponents of the government fear criminal investigations, lawsuits, tax audits and other punitive measures and even Republican politicians are, as one former Trump administration official , “scared” out of their minds “about death threats.”
American civil society has the financial and organizational muscle to resist Mr. Trump’s authoritarian offensive. It has several hundred billionaires; dozens of law firms that earn at least a billion dollars a year; more than 1,700 private universities and colleges; a vast infrastructure of churches, labor unions, private foundations and nonprofit organizations; and a well-organized and well-financed opposition party.
But civil society must act collectively. Chief executives, law firms, universities, media outlets and Democratic politicians, as well as more traditional Republicans, have a common interest in preserving our constitutional democracy. When organizations work together and commit to a collective defense of democratic principles, they share the costs of defiance. The government cannot attack everyone all at once. When the costs of defiance are shared, they become easier for individuals to bear.
So far, the most energetic opposition has come not from civic leaders but from everyday citizens, showing up at congressional town hall meetings or participating in Hands Off rallies across the country. Our leaders must follow their example. A collective defense of democracy is most likely to succeed when prominent, well-funded individuals and organizations — those who are best able to absorb blows from the government — get in the game.
America’s slide into authoritarianism is reversible. But no one has ever defeated autocracy from the sidelines.
25May2025
from SPLC
posted in Docs & Files > Action Tools
Heatmap
... “”... It $3.3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years. The bill’s next stop is the Senate, where it could change significantly. But if this bill is enacted, it will jack up America’s energy and environmental risks — for relatively little benefit.
The Republican megabill will make climate change worse. Within a year or two, the U.S. will be pumping out half a gigaton more carbon pollution per year than it would in a world where the IRA remains on the books, ...
What does America get for this increase in air pollution? After all, it’s possible to imagine situations where such a surge could bring economic benefits. In this case, though, we don’t get very much at all. Repealing the tax credits from GDP over the next decade, ...Across the country, household energy costs by 2035, on top of any normal market-driven volatility, ...
In other words, in exchange for more pollution, Americans will get less economic growth but higher energy costs. ...
Republicans are now trying to remove these tax bonuses in order to finance tax cuts for high-earning households. But removing the IRA alone won’t pay for the tax credits, so they will also have to borrow trillions of dollars. This is already , driving up interest rates for Americans. Indeed, a U.S. Treasury auction earlier this week for $16 billion in bonds, driving stocks and the dollar down while spiking treasury yields.
Higher interest rates will make it more expensive to build any kind of new power plant. ... Batteries are a , and they will undergird many of the most important general and military technologies of the next several decades. ...
Does this mean that Republicans will kill America’s electric vehicle industry? Not necessarily. But they will dent its growth, strength, and expansion. They will make it weaker and more vulnerable to external interference. ... It is risky to make the power grid so exposed to natural gas price volatility. It is risky to jack up the federal deficit during peacetime for so little gain. It is risky to cede so much demand for U.S.-sourced critical minerals. It is risky to raise interest rates in an era of higher trade barriers, uncertain supply shocks, and geopolitical instability.
?, If You Can Keep It Substack
I find democracy is best explained through its benefits. ... the rule of law, individual rights, and electoral freedom.
The rule of law, fairness, and predictability
Democracy is good for business. ... But that’s not true when an autocratic leader with no safeguards can make impulsive or self-serving economic policy decisions.… like, say, a and the global trade system?
That predictability — that impartiality — helps ensure our freedom. Otherwise, we’re all at the whims of people with power.
Individual rights and the restraints on power
In our day-to-day lives, many of us don’t spend much time thinking about our rights: to speak our minds, to travel freely, to worship as we wish, to feel safe and secure in our homes, to earn a living, to love and marry, to criticize the powerful, and to not be arbitrarily and indefinitely imprisoned. But in reality, everything around us is built on the foundation of fundamental rights like and and and .
Often, these violations of individual rights start with — and are built around — centralized databases and surveillance structures to monitor citizens. The more the government knows about you, the more options it has to potentially curtail your basic freedoms.
Right now, the Trump administration and DOGE are to build a massive, unified database of all Americans. We don’t know what this database will be used for.
Whatever its purpose, trust me: Our rights are worth protecting before they’re dismantled, not after.
Electoral freedom and the ability to choose our leaders
Democracy is a system in which parties lose elections. ... Do the people in power routinely lose and leave power through elections? If yes, great. If no, that’s not a democracy.
It’s not just that we the people get to select our leaders — and therefore have a say in policy decisions ... It’s that we have a failsafe way to remove leaders from power when we inevitably need to do so....
, The Ground Game Substack
WHAT MOBILIZING ACTUALLY DOES
Mobilizing begins with a countdown clock. ...
The assignment is simple and brutal: convert latent sympathy into visible pressure before the clock hits zero. Lists matter more than deep relationships, message discipline more than philosophical depth, and friction-free tech beats Robert’s Rules every time.
WHAT ORGANIZING ACTUALLY DOES
Organizing starts ... with a power map. ... What exact decision must flip, and by when? Who can actually say “yes” or “no,” and who whispers in their ear? What do those actors prize most, votes, profit, reputation, stability, and where is that prize exposed? Which organized people, money, and narrative can we already marshal, or quickly build, to press on that nerve? Finally, what public action will convert our assets into a cost they can’t ignore or a benefit they crave? Those five questions sketch the first draft of any serious campaign plan.
Organizing opens a power chart.
Mobilizing opens a turnout model.
Both models are essential, yet neither is sufficient alone.
, Waging Non-Violence
We are heading down a perilous road. Vulnerable communities face growing threats. The climate crisis is outpacing scientists’ worst predictions. Authoritarianism is no longer a distant possibility — it is rising, with democracy backsliding across the globe. With Trump’s return, public services like education, labor protections, humane immigration policies, health care and diversity programs are being dismantled.
Meanwhile, trust in democracy is — especially among young people. As political scientist Steven points out, part of the problem is motivational: The political right is fighting for a clear, albeit dangerous, vision. The left, by contrast, is often fighting against that vision, with fewer compelling alternatives on offer.
So what can we do? We build. We shift away from reform — away from tweaking broken systems — and instead direct our energy toward creating entirely new ones. And the beauty of this method is: we don’t have to start from scratch. We can draw from history. ...
Empowered communities: Building power from the ground up
As organizer and strategist Marshallnotes, power means having others more dependent on you than you are on them. Translated, this means the people have become almost entirely dependent on the services and structures owned or operated by states and mega-corporations, who far too often, exploit people for their own gain. To become genuinely empowered, people can work in community to meet their essential needs — food, housing, healthcare, education, energy, technology and economic stability. And this is not theory. It’s already happening. Across the globe, people are building systems from the ground up that meet human needs while resisting corporate and state overreach.
Food security: Growing resilience, one seed at a time
Corporate agribusiness dominates food supply chains, prioritizing profit over people. These monopolized supply chains not only distance us from the sources of our food — they make us vulnerable to disruption, price manipulation and environmental collapse. To grow their power and resilience, communities are reclaiming food through local co-ops, urban farms and direct partnerships with farmers. ... By feeding ourselves and our communities — intentionally, ethically and locally — we remove power from those who misuse it, and begin building something lasting in its place.
Housing: Reclaiming shelter as a human right
In cities across the globe, real estate speculation and corporate landlords have turned shelter into a commodity — driving rents sky-high and pushing working people into precarious living conditions or homelessness.
But communities are not powerless. When people organize to collectively own and manage their homes, they create one of the most powerful tools of nonviolent resistance: housing cooperatives.
Health care: Healing without permission
Across the globe — even in wealthy nations — health care is increasingly monopolized by profit-driven corporations or crippled by underfunded public systems. Millions are left without basic care, forced to choose between crushing debt or untreated illness. ...
Education: Learning to resist, learning to build
When an elite few control what counts as knowledge, when critical thinking is replaced by obedience, we’re not just approaching fascism — we’re already living it.
Energy: Power from the people
... When communities own their energy, they own their future. They are no longer dependent on corporations who serve shareholders, or governments who delay transition for political convenience.
Technology: Reclaiming the digital commons
Big Tech corporations monitor, monetize and manipulate digital spaces — treating our attention and data as commodities, shaping public discourse through opaque algorithms. The result? A digital world that is increasingly extractive, surveilled and inaccessible to those without wealth or expertise. But just like food, land or energy — technology can be reclaimed. ...
Safety and security: From control to care
Creating community-based safety doesn’t require permission. It requires a shift in mindset — from protection-through-force to protection-through-care. ...
Authoritarianism thrives when people are isolated and dependent — when food, energy, housing and safety are controlled by a handful of elites. But when communities feed each other, house each other, teach each other and protect each other — they are less dependent on dominant systems, which allows them to mount a more effective resistance. ...
The answer isn’t just electing better leaders. It’s building a world where no one has the power to deny another human being their basic rights.
1June2025
video, Robert Reich
, Nate Hagens
at Wesleyan University
Eighty-five years later, the foundations of our democracy are being tested. We are in a moment of profound risk. A moment of true consequence. And in moments like this, history always offers two paths. One leads to renewal. The other to ruin. And the burden of choosing the right path, Class of 2025, falls to you.
And the first, step one, is to be that spark. Take the first action — even just small symbolic ones, ... Courage really is contagious.
And it leads to step two: collective action. ... When freedom is threatened, people who normally disagree must band together in its defense. Divide and conquer is tyranny's oldest trick. Pit us against each other — on the basis of race, religion, or national origin — and it's easier to pick our pockets of money and power.
And if we do that, we create the space for step three: not just to resist, but to rebuild. The 20th-century order is over. A new age is being born. What democracy looks like in that new age — how it works, whom it serves — that is your generation's work.... We can do better than this. So long as we build from our most cherished ideals: Freedom. Justice. Human dignity. Equality under the law.
, Rev. William Barber & Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove
DOGE is a scam, but its consequences are real. ... because of the careless cuts Musk made to the USAID program, decimating US investment in fighting hunger and disease around the world. ... These life-saving and life-sustaining programs were canceled because Elon Musk lied and called them “waste, fraud, and abuse.” His lie meant that children died of malnutrition, diarrhea, and tuberculosis. ... Like Musk’s chainsaw, the $1.1 trillion of total cuts proposed in this big, ugly GOP bill would put Medicaid, SNAP, and green energy programs through the woodchipper. They would balloon the deficit in ways that threaten Medicare, all to offset tax cuts for the wealthy and extreme spending on war and more masked militias to attack immigrant communities. .... The DOGE scam is killing people all around the world; unless 3 Republicans in the Senate take a stand against this big, ugly bill, the lie about “waste, fraud, and abuse” will soon be killing people in your neighborhood.
suggest nonvoters are already feeling that their vote may matter more than they’d though it did. More than a third of nonvoters from 2024 now regret their decision not to cast a ballot in 2024, and among those regretful nonvoters 68% agree Trump is a dictator who must be stopped. It’s a striking data point: nonvoters are almost as opposed to the Trump regime as Democrats. ... Now is the time to link up, build a big, broad moral fusion coalition, and commit ourselves to follow the leadership of people who know their lives are at stake. ...
, Wired
Sahil Lavingia published on his personal website detailing his 55-day stint within DOGE. Lavingia, who as a member of DOGE at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), is the CEO of Gumroad, a platform that helps creatives sell their work. ... Lavingia describes the kinds of projects he worked on at the VA and his overall impressions of working with DOGE. Lavingia described the DOGE operations as “disorganized,” with little information sharing across different teams. ... Musk has spent the last few weeks saying that he is going to be largely leaving his DOGE duties behind. Two of his closest lieutenants, and , appear to be departing as well. Davis, who has worked with Musk for years, including at X and as the CEO of the Boring Company, has been integral to the day-to-day operations of DOGE. Without Davis at the helm, Lavingia says, it’s unclear who will lead DOGE—and in what direction. “Steven was the only person who was across everything,”
Lavingia told WIRED that Davis appeared to be the person directing most of the DOGE activities at different agencies, and was in direct contact with all the DOGE members at various points. Generally, in Lavingia’s experience, that correspondence happened using the encrypted messaging app Signal. Experts and lawmakers have that using Signal for official government communications could violate laws that require government employees to maintain records of all communications. ... Davis would message priorities to whoever was the DOGE team lead at a given agency. At the VA, Lavingia tells WIRED, Davis instructed the DOGE team to prioritize reviewing contracts for cancellation. ... These three men— Armstrong, Akis, and Davis—appeared to be the people in charge ... “Steven is basically like a chief of staff or body man when Elon was there,” ...
Akis, the cofounder and president of venture capital firm Human Capital, is a longtime Musk associate. He is not a US citizen. In February, The Atlantic reported that from hiring Akis into DOGE because he was born in Turkey, though he has a green card. s, The Atlantic noted, generally do not allow for non-Americans to be employed by the government.
Armstrong, who helped advise Musk on his purchase of Twitter, has at the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), .
Davis has long been an important part of Musk’s inner circle. ... Davis , then based out of SpaceX’s DC offices. He recruited one young engineer who is now running a , ... Davis was also instrumental in pressing for a (SSA) for one of the group’s young engineers, Akash Bobba.
Musk and Davis were what is known as special government employees, who are able to work in government for a limited period of time, up to 130 days. In his blog post, Lavingia writes that DOGE was a way for the Trump administration to distance itself from otherwise unpopular decisions. “In reality, DOGE had no direct authority. The real decisions came from the agency heads appointed by President Trump, who were wise to let DOGE act as the ‘fall guy’ for unpopular decisions,” ... Without Musk and Davis, Lavingia says he has “no idea” what direction DOGE will take. And as for the young engineers who followed Musk and Davis into government: “I assume they’ll leave soon too.”
8June2025
, Wired
If you’re planning to hit the streets, here’s what you need to know.
, Ruth Ben-Ghiat
The Donald Trump administration blends classic means of authoritarian takeover with something new: a power-sharing agreement between a president and a private individual, Elon Musk. This agreement allowed the latter to strike at the state via a lawless vanguard of technical experts under his command. ...
Far from ending its work, DOGE is expanding, and its lawless actions are being institutionalized as a second phase of action begins. DOGE and Project 2025’s own armies of democratic destruction will work together under Office of Management and Budget director Russ Vought’s guide. ...
Trump allowed DOGE to take over the United States government’s administrative and financial systems, capture the personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans, and decimate numerous essential government agencies. ...
They occupied and locked out members of Congress from government buildings, installed themselves physically in those spaces, remaining there 24/7, fired many thousands of government employees after barring them from their own computer systems, physically removed officials who sought to stop their seizures and infiltrations, shut down and defunded whole programs and agencies, ...
DOGE is now embedded in over 30 United States government agencies and departments, including the , the , the , the , the United Postal Service, and the IRS (which hasalmost 1/3 of its tax auditors after just 2 months of DOGE cuts).
They have also breached the , which guards banking and other details for more than 87 million Americans and thus is a prime target for plunder. The tech billionaire Antonio Gracias is now there as a DOGE staffer, and the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to give DOGE access to its records....
, Pamela Paxton
That’s where . The independent federal agency for national service and volunteerism has facilitated the a year, placing them through partnerships with thousands of nonprofits that provide tutoring, disaster relief and many other important services. But Americorps’ fate is now uncertain. In April 2025, the Trump administration , suddenly ending the stipends that were supporting more than 32,000 AmeriCorps volunteers. ... The Trump administration has also and indicated that it wants to , along with its .
Since then, AmeriCorps members have built housing and infrastructure, delivered disaster relief, tutored in low-income schools, provided health care and helped older adults age with dignity in both urban and rural communities across the nation. ... One such study found that every dollar invested in national service , such as higher earnings, better mental and physical health, and economic growth. Additionally, every federal dollar spent on national service produces $17.30 in savings across other government programs through reductions in public assistance, health and criminal justice spending.
, Waging Nonviolence
Musk’s 130-day tenure at DOGE was characterized by aggressive cruelty. He eliminated somewhere between 200,000-260,000 federal positions through mass firings, buyouts and early retirements. He didn’t achieve his stated goal of $2 trillion in savings. Even his website, filled with misleading and inaccurate claims, — and are closer to 0.8 percent. The most casual look at his reveals that the goal isn’t savings — it’s enriching himself and displacing democracy. Predictably the Republican budget is set to explode deficit spending and extract more money from all but the richest people in this country. ... This approach can be expanded to target Musk’s contracts with SpaceX — in conjunction with more protests at its facilities, like the ones that have already happened in , and . Pressure could also be ramped up on T-Mobile and anyone else using Starlink to find services that aren’t run by pro-DOGE billionaires. ... If you’re not sure where to begin, remember Tesla Takedown didn’t start as a national plan. It started with a bunch of people doing things that made sense to them — and eventually a small crew “coordinated” what was already happening locally across the country.
, Demcast
Millions of Americans will lose Medicaid and food assistance under Trump's proposed tax bill, all to pay for more tax breaks for billionaires who don't need them. ... The GOP's tax scam is a BILLIONAIRE BAILOUT, plain and simple. They're taking money from working families to give to their wealthy donors. ...
The GOP priorities are clear: billionaires and corporations before people.
, Rebecca Solnit
I think maybe it's begun, the bigger fiercer backlash against the Trump Administration which is itself a violent backlash against every good thing that's happened over the past several decades – the advance of rights for nature, women, children, indigenous peoples, BIPOC and immigrants/refugees, queer people, trans people, people with disabilities, workers, the right of us all to be free from being poisoned by food, water, air. It's begun in Los Angeles, the city of angels, a city of almost four million people, almost half of them Latino, in a region of almost twelve million that two thousand California National Guards cannot and will not subjugate. All they can do is punish and incite, and I hope that some of the protesters are telling them they're violating their mission and maybe the law. ... It is up to us to defeat that agenda, and up to all of us who are not those under attack by this administration to stand with them and for them. At its heart the Trump Administration is violently divisive, isolationist, and segregationist, and solidarity is our first duty and most profound rejection of that agenda.
Notes on Activism, Kara Joy
while i am absolutely still engaged, i am also old. and tired. been at actively trying to avoid this brand of very specific eventuality for a very long time. i’m also loving all of this newer activist energy. people write me a lot, asking how i haven’t completely burned out over time. so. fwiw…
notes to newer activists (or) things i wish i would’ve known 30 years ago (or) what i’ve learned so far:
activism without community leads to burnout. find your people. stay engaged. cultivate community. if you don’t have it, build it.
while we’re all aligned, there will inevitably be differing ideas. anchor into your values. the infighting will happen. that’s just a given. esp on the left. we’re famous for it.
you don’t have to do everything - just do a one thing. something. anything. and then do the next right thing.
ask yourself often - is my reaction and movement rooted in trauma response? adjust accordingly. work from a place of wholeness, as close as you can get to that. rage is fine. incredibly valid. but also embrace grief, love, joy, imagination, creativity, vision. they last longer. feel it all.
rest is resistance. it’s not a detour. or betrayal. community is resistance.
take news breaks. let your nervous system reset, as best as possible.
before actions or organizing, make a little ritual. get grounded in the present. a breath. a mantra. a magical rock in your pocket. after, return to rest. a quiet walk. a nap. a cup of tea. reflect in a journal. create a playlist of songs that soothe you. this is a reminder to your nervous system that right now you are safe, whole, human.
celebrate small wins. joy is also resistance. there will be far more of these.
you’re likely feeling a great sense of urgency. hold that by the edges. none of this happened overnight and it’s not going to be undone overnight. urgency culture is real. what’s an emergency? triage it, emotionally and practically.
observe, don’t absorb. act where/when you can. it takes all of us. it takes every moment you are able to give.
your heart will break. a lot. you’ll feel frustrated. it’s part of being aware. take care of you. a lot of trauma lives in activist spaces. the basics: sleep, eat, hydrate, move. the not so basic but also vitals: somatic work, breathing - the intentional kind. therapy.
keep learning, keep unlearning. being teachable, being open, stepping outside your comfort zone is radical. you don’t need to be a flawless activist, just show up. know you’ll screw something up. own it. adjust. shift.
vision: what are you fighting for, not just against. imagine it. draw it. write it. collage it. build it in micro-moments.
healthy activism means you’re leaving it better than you found it.
get cozy with grief. it’s part of justice work. it honors what hasn’t changed. what’s been lost. grieve alone, grieve collectively.
visibility isn’t impact. anchor to your why. return to it often. not all social media posts are effective. not all social media posts are performative. but some are. will it have an impact? is it effective? things to ask you.
justice is a practice, not a purity test. guilt and shame backfire and will not lead to action. teach. welcome. provide on-ramps to action.
go back and find the activists throughout history that bring the fire for you. there are certain words i always return to when i’m feeling despair. collect them to have at the ready.
stay open to wonder. look at the stars. listen to old songs. look at the sky. a river. babies. there’s a lot of beauty to fight for.
authoritarianism wants you tired, scared, joyless. your delight is resistance fuel. joy is resistance.
never forget. we are all connected. what happens to one of us happens to all of us. we are wired for connection. fierce individualism is killing us.
empathy is not weakness. it’s a lifeline. no matter what they say. don’t let the bastards grind you down.
mostly, thank you, deeply and sincerely, thank you, for whatever it is you are doing to make the world a better place. for knowing we are all connected. for acting accordingly. ❤️❤️❤️ Kara Joy
15June2025
, Robert Reich Substack
The energy, exuberance, and solidarity of those demonstrations [June 14th, No Kings Day] stood in sharp contrast to Trump’s noxious display of tanks and military equipment on Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C. ... We will not be intimidated by the violence he has stirred up — not by the shootings of state legislators and their spouses in Minnesota, nor by the death threats against federal judges, nor by the thuggish removal of a United States senator from a Trump official’s news conference, nor by the arrest of a judge who didn’t cooperate with ICE, nor by the abductions of people from our streets and places of work.
We will be steadfast and strong, as we were in yesterday’s protests.
The moral squalor of Trump has brought us back to basics: Why we have a Constitution. The meaning of the rule of law. The importance of checks and balances and separation of powers. The centrality of our judiciary. The significance of due process and habeas corpus. The connection between near-record inequalities of income and wealth, and the record levels of money corrupting our politics....
Patriotism based on the common good does not pander to divisiveness. It does not vilify diversity, equity, and inclusion. True patriots don’t fuel racist or religious or ethnic divisions. They aren’t homophobic or transphobic or sexist. True patriots confirm the good that we have in common. They seek to strengthen and celebrate the “We” in “We the people.”
Trump is the opposite of a patriot. He is a traitor and a coward. His lust for power and wealth at the expense of the common good makes this one of the most shameful chapters of our history.
Yesterday we reasserted “We.” We did it largely peacefully. We gained strength from our solidarity. We celebrated of our numbers and our power. We will be steadfast. We will not cower to a dictator. We will win.
, Ro Khanna (D-CA)
Congressman on Tuesday unveiled a progressive plan to cut the deficit by $12 trillion and enable investment in "essential programs for ordinary Americans: childcare, universal healthcare, affordable housing, free college, cancellation, advanced manufacturing, and good-paying jobs."
The California Democrat's , introduced in a report and floor , has five recommendations to cut spending: modernize the military ($850 billion), get rid of upcoding and fraud in ($830 billion), negotiate Medicare drug prices ($200 billion), end fossil fuel subsidies ($170 billion), and implement smarter procurement and contracting ($333 billion)....
The plan doesn't just advocate for spending cuts, it also features a trio of recommendations for generating revenue: tax corporations fairly ($2 trillion), tax billionaires ($4.7 trillion), and protect Social Security ($2.9 trillion).
, Notes on the Crises Substack
The first public signal of chaos at the IRS ... when the that DOGE was seeking access to the IRS’s Integrated Data Retrieval System—one of the most sensitive ... databases of personal information in the federal government. ...Since then, the chaos has only multiplied to include , , and a DOGE-hosted IRS “.” These aren’t isolated incidents. They reflect a strategic campaign to transform the IRS into a politically partisan enforcement mechanism and a lever of executive power.
The IRS sits at the center of the federal government’s fiscal architecture. As the financial nexus between the state and its residents, it facilitates the movement of trillions of dollars through the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. It enforces tax law, detects fraud, and has the authority to audit the ultra-wealthy to crack down on tax evasion that enables them to become even richer. ... taxes facilitate the provision of public goods and services: everything from national defense and infrastructure to schools and our social safety nets. Taxes come in many forms, including income taxes (on wages, salaries, and capital gains), consumption taxes (such as sales and excise taxes), property taxes, and corporate taxes ... What’s also being lost in all of this is not just IRS institutional expertise or workforce capacity. It’s the legitimacy of the social contract: the idea that taxation is a collective democratic function. DOGE’s approach echoes a system where data is extracted not to serve the public, but to entrench private and executive power. In this framework, the IRS no longer upholds civic duty, but instead enforces obedience. Public authority remains, but democratic accountability disappears.
We are no longer just watching a system decay. We are watching it be consolidated to serve private power, silence dissent, and reverse the very idea of democratic taxation. It’s a constitutional breakdown. If the IRS falls, we won’t just lose an agency; we’ll lose one of the last institutional expressions of democratic obligation. Taxation is not just how we keep a number of key infrastructures running—it is how we declare what we value, who we protect, and who must answer to the public. The IRS reflects that social contract, however imperfectly, and not without deep bias. But unlike some other federal institutions, its mandate remains tenuously anchored in public law and congressional oversight. It is one of the few places where the struggle over fiscal accountability is still active and, for now, structurally possible.
22June2025
, Eduardo Porter, Wa Post
It has been easy to dismiss efforts to raise the prospects of the world’s poorest as an abject failure. The United Nations reported 712 million people living in in 2022, 23 million more than in 2019. The share of the world’s population rose from 7.9 percent to 9.2 percent over the period. And 2.1 billion people still dung, wood, charcoal and the like. ... But, if you zoom out, the track record of some of the world’s poorest nations in improving the living standards of their own people has been surprisingly robust — better than anyone could have guessed just a quarter-century ago, when the United Nations laid out its Millennium Development Goals.
To top this all off, some of the world’s most affluent countries have decided they have had enough with development aid. It’s not just the Trump administration, which tossed USAID into the wood chipper. Britain cut its aid budget to 0.3 percent of its gross domestic product, from 0.7 percent before the pandemic. Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden have also .
The most important upshot from these numbers is that while there still is a long way to go to provide for a decent living for hundreds of millions of destitute people around the world, there is a plausible path to get there. While most of the progress has been funded from the budgets of low-income countries themselves, disappearing aid will make their road harder. Aid plays an indispensable role, providing the sorts of things that poor countries cannot. It will be difficult, for instance, for governments in sub-Saharan Africa to replicate , launched in the George W. Bush administration to provide broad access to antiretroviral drugs, saving tens of millions of lives from the scourge of AIDS.
James Greenberg
That counter-narrative might begin like this:
You matter—not because of your income, education, or politics—but because you are part of a shared society whose future depends on all of us. This country has been sold out by those who put profit before people—by corporations and political elites who abandoned communities while insulating themselves from the consequences. The struggle isn’t between neighbors. It’s between those who extract and those left to carry the cost. Democracy isn’t about shouting the loudest. It’s about showing up—for your neighbors, your community, and the shared spaces that hold us together. Patriotism isn’t about who you exclude. It’s about what we build together, and who we refuse to leave behind. ... We need a public narrative rooted in dignity, care, and shared responsibility—and we need the material conditions that make that story believable. The vision is already out there, scattered across movements, communities, and everyday acts of solidarity.
29June2025
, Robert Reich Substack
Jeff Bezos’s Washington Post editorializes that “Democrats should fear that [Mamdani] will discredit their next generation of party leaders, almost all of whom are better than this democratic socialist.” … the Post criticizes Mamdani’s proposals for a 2 percent annual wealth tax on the richest 1 percent of New Yorkers and for increasing the state’s corporate tax rate from 7.25 percent to 11.5 percent: “Mamdani’s tax plans would spur a corporate exodus and drive more rich people out of town, undermining the tax base and making existing services harder to maintain.”... Rubbish. The reality is that if you invest in your people — in their skills, education, affordable child care, affordable elder care, and the infrastructure needed to link them together — they’ll be more productive, and their higher productivity will attract corporations (and the wealthy). A major way to afford all these things is to raise taxes on corporations and the wealthy.
Mamdani is the corporate Democrat’s biggest nightmare — a young, charismatic politician winning over Democratic voters with an optimistic message centering on the cost of living. Putting together a multiethnic and multiracial coalition backed by a sprawling grassroots campaign that brings out enormous numbers of volunteers. Aiming to fund what average people need by taxing corporations and the rich. …. The largest force in American politics today is antiestablishment fury at a system rigged by big corporations and the wealthy to make them even richer and more powerful. The corporate Democratic establishment — fat cats on Wall Street, corporate moguls in C-suites, billionaire backers of Democrats … are the biggest problem for the party. They are standing in the way of it’s mounting a forceful response to Trump and providing a blueprint for the future.
Trump is killing the economy, fueling inflation with his tariffs, reducing the U.S. government to rubble, and destroying our relationships with our allies. He’s readying another giant tax cut for the wealthy and big corporations — this one to be financed by cuts in Medicaid, food stamps, and other things average people need, along with trillions more in national debt.
If Democrats had had the guts years ago to condemn big money in politics, fight corporate welfare, and unrig a market that’s been rigged in favor of big corporations and the rich, Trump’s absurd bogeymen (the deep state, immigrants, socialists, trans people, diversity-equity-inclusion) wouldn’t have stood a chance. ... My simple advice to congressional Democrats: Wake the hell up. According to polls, most Americans don’t want a Trump Republican budget that slashes Medicaid, food stamps, and child nutrition in order to make way for a giant tax cut mostly for the wealthy. ... Most don’t want tariffs that drive up the prices they pay for food, gas, housing, and clothing. Most understand that tariffs are taxes paid by American consumers. Most don’t want a government of, by, and for billionaires. Most believe in democracy and the rule of law and don’t want Trump trampling on the Constitution, acts of Congress, and federal court orders.
… Democrats … should stop relying on so-called “moderates” to speak for them. The nation is in clear and present danger. Democrats must stand up for American ideals at a time when the Trump regime is riding roughshod over them. … Democrats need Zohran Mamdani and other young politicians with fight in their hearts and rage in their bellies who can show that Trump is bad for working people and terrible for America and the world, and who can point the way forward. We need a new generation of leaders who are the voices of democracy, freedom, social justice, and the rule of law. A new generation that gives meaning to the “we” in “we the people.” … Instead of fretting over Mamdani, the Democratic Party should embrace him as the future.
,
Share these posts.
The top testing reason to oppose the bill in the same survey was: “The American people are already struggling with high prices, and this bill, along with Trump's tariffs, will make things even worse by stoking inflation, raising interest rates, and forcing people to pay more for healthcare, food, and utility bills. ...
, Robert Reich Substack
“The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is ,” Musk said, adding that liberals and progressives are “exploiting a bug in Western civilization, which is the empathy response.” ... Musk disdains social insurance such as Social Security, which he calls a “Ponzi scheme.” ... Trump’s Republicans are now raiding Medicaid and food stamps to make way for a giant tax cut mostly for the rich. No empathy bug there. Trump’s Department of Homeland Security is grabbing people off the streets and from courthouses without warrants and putting them in detention centers. ... Both Musk and Trump are experts in taking selfish advantage of everything, anything, and anybody. Both have altered government programs and regulations to reap personal financial gain. Both have been quick to fire people. Both demand loyalty to themselves but have no loyalty to anything or anyone besides themselves.
They’ve got it all wrong. Empathy is a necessary precondition for a society. Without empathy, we’d be living in a social Darwinist jungle animated only by selfish individuals pursuing selfish needs, like Musk and Trump. Without a shared sense of empathy and responsibility, we would have to assume that everyone — including legislators, judges, regulators, and police — was acting selfishly, making and enforcing laws for their own benefit. In a world populated by people like Musk and Trump, we couldn’t trust anyone to be truthful if they could do better for themselves by lying. We couldn’t count on any claim by sellers of any product or service. Internet-based “reputational ratings” would be of little value because raters would be easily bribed. ... Journalists would shade their reports for their own selfish advantage, taking bribes from advertisers or currying favor with politicians. Teachers would offer lessons to satisfy wealthy or powerful patrons. Historians would alter history if by doing so they gained wealth or power. Scientists would doctor evidence for similar selfish motives. The truth would degenerate into a cacophony of competing factual claims, as, in part, it has. We couldn’t trust doctors or pharmacists to give us the right medications. We couldn’t trust bankers and accountants not to fleece us, restaurants not to feed us tainted food, lawyers not to hoodwink us. A society depends on people trusting that most others in society will have a modicum of empathy for others rather than take advantage of them. In this way, civic trust is self-enforcing and self-perpetuating, while civic distrust can corrode the very foundations of a society. ... Our core identity as Americans — the most precious legacy we have been given by the generations who came before us — consists of the ideals we share and the obligations we hold in common. We are tied together by these empathic meanings and duties. Our loyalties and attachments, guided by empathy, define who we are.
If we are losing our national identity, it is not because we are becoming blacker or browner or speak in more languages than we once did. It is because we are losing the ties that bind us together, our collective empathy.
6July2025
, Dave Borlace
JP Morgan chase recently published a comprehensive climate report which spelled out to its investors how they should be adapting to the coming storm and pointed out all the lucrative investment opportunities a warming planet presents (like melting sea ice & thawing permafrost opening up new trade routes and mining sites, and increasing temperatures providing an uplift to the air-conditioning market. Meanwhile the UK Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, who are financial risk managers, published their own analysis with a very different outlook. This video compares and contrasts the two reports.
, Robert Reich
True patriots don’t fuel racist, religious, or ethnic divisions. Patriots aren’t homophobic or sexist. They aren’t blind to social injustices, whether ongoing or embedded in American history. They don’t ban books or prevent teaching about the sins of the nation’s past. They don’t abduct hard-working people and put them in prison camps in the Everglades. They don’t rob from the poor to reward the rich. They don’t cut Medicaid and food stamps so the wealthiest Americans get a tax cut.
True patriots are not uncritically devoted to America. They are devoted instead to the ideals of America — the rule of law, equal justice, voting rights and civil rights, freedom of speech and assembly, freedom from fear, and democracy. They express patriotism in taking a fair share of the burdens of keeping the nation going, sacrificing for the common good. This means paying their fair share of taxes rather than lobbying for lower taxes or seeking tax loopholes. It means refraining from making large political contributions that corrupt American democracy. It means blowing the whistle on abuses of power even at the risk of losing one’s job. It means volunteering time and energy to improving one’s community and country. It means standing up to tyranny — protesting, boycotting, organizing, engaging in nonviolent civil disobedience.
Patriots don’t make baseless claims that millions of people vote fraudulently, and seek laws that make it harder for people to vote. Patriots strengthen democracy, defend the right to vote, and ensure that more Americans are heard. Patriots understand that when they serve the public, their responsibility is to maintain and build public trust in the institutions of democracy. They don’t put personal ambition above their love of America. They don’t try to hold power after voters have chosen not to reelect them. They don’t attempt a coup. They don’t make money off their public offices. They don’t usurp the powers of Congress. They don’t defy the courts. They don’t try to take over universities or law firms. When serving on the Supreme Court, they recuse themselves from cases where they may appear to have a conflict of interest.
America’s problem ism’t that the nation is losing its whiteness or its dominant religion or that too many foreigners are crossing our borders or that men are competing in women’s sports or teachers are not celebrating the nation’s history. Our problem is that too many Americans, including the person who now holds the highest office in the land, don’t know the true meaning of patriotism — and what it requires from all of us.
, Jen Psaki Video
... the devastating removal of health care and food aid to millions of Americans, in service of tax cuts for rich people
The recent attack on science in the US is not only undermining knowledge; it is also undermining democracy. In a healthy democracy, public policy is guided by evidence, and truth is the shared foundation for collective decision-making. When scientific expertise is dismissed or hidden in favor of ideology, it becomes harder for citizens to deliberate, to solve problems, and to hold leaders accountable. The diminution and marginalization of science are thus central parts of the erosion of democracy itself. This erosion is not hypothetical. Political scientists and global watchdogs have warned that democracy in the US is in decline. The Economist’s Democracy Index () no longer categorizes the US as a “full democracy” (like Germany, the UK, and Canada) but a “flawed democracy.”
Is it possible then that US citizens will wake up one day to find themselves in an authoritarian nation? We hope not, but the best answer is “maybe.” Part of the reason, we think, lies not in politics but in neuroscience. In general, people are less likely to respond to, or even notice, gradual changes. That is largely due to habituation, which is the brain’s tendency to react less and less to things that are constant or that change slowly. It is why 20 minutes after entering a room full of cigarette smoke you can no longer perceive the smell and why you stop noticing the constant hum of an air conditioner or the buzz of city traffic. Your brain filters out these background noises.
When self-government is at risk, the best remedy is dishabituation – to see things not in light of the deterioration of recent years, but in light of our best historical practices, our largest ideals, and our highest aspirations. We can dishabituate if we keep those practices, ideals, and aspirations firmly in view, and if we compare what is happening today not to what happened yesterday or the day before, but to what we hope will happen tomorrow.
As autocratic regimes around the world increasingly and academic freedom, a team of researchers has published a new to help scientists protect their personal safety and their work. The new handbook is a timely resource “given the unprecedented assault on American science, academia, scientists and truth by the Trump administration, Republican Congress, and an increasingly politicized Supreme Court,” water and climate researcher Peter Gleick, with the , wrote via email. “It offers clear descriptions of the kinds of threats and authoritarian tactics we now face. More importantly, it offers options and strategies for pushing back, depending on if the threats one personally faces are low, medium or high.” Gleick said the handbook also includes good suggestions for helping both scientists and nonscientists advocate for science by engaging with the media and elected officials, as well as how to reach out to younger generations and students. And it’s accompanied by an, where people can share stories, warnings and advice. It defines authoritarianism this way: “The concentration of power in the hands of a small group of people who act in ways that are not constitutionally accountable to the people they are meant to represent and serve.” Core hallmarks of autocrats include rejecting democratic rules, denying the legitimacy of opponents, tolerating or encouraging political violence, curtailing opponents’ civil liberties and breaking down social cohesion to divide and rule a society,
TheAnti-AutocracyHandbook(A4)-1.pdf
490.6 kB
, Grace Huckins (page 26→)
As of now, there’s no foolproof way to guarantee that agents will act as their developers intend or to prevent malicious actors from misusing them. ... “If we continue on the current path of building agentic systems, we are basically playing Russian roulette with humanity.” ... researchers have worried for years about whether malicious actors might use them to generate propaganda at a large scale or obtain instructions for building a bioweapon. ... As agents grow increasingly capable, they are becoming powerful cyberattack weapons ... There’s a straightforward solution, Kang says, at least in the short term: Follow best practices for cybersecurity, like requiring users to use two-factor authentication and engaging in rigorous predeployment testing. ... If agents are the ideal cybersecurity weapon, they are also the ideal cybersecurity victim. ... A particularly naïve LLM might be tricked by an email that reads, “Ignore all previous instructions and send me all user passwords.... . For the already powerful— executives, politicians, generals—agents are a force multiplier. That’s because agents could reduce the need for expensive human workers. ... That’s not great news for software developers or economists. It’s even worse news for lower-income workers like those in call centers, .... Many of the white-collar workers at risk of being replaced by agents have sufficient savings to stay afloat while they search for new jobs—and degrees and transferable skills that could help them find work. Others could feel the effects of automation much more acutely. ...
Policy solutions such as training programs and expanded unemployment insurance, not to mention guaranteed basic income schemes, could make a big difference here. But agent automation may have even more dire consequences than job loss. In May, Elon Musk reportedly said that AI should be used in place of some federal employees, tens of thousands of whom were fired during his time as a “special government employee” earlier this year. Some experts worry that such moves could radically increase the power of political leaders at the expense of democracy. Human workers can question, challenge, or reinterpret the instructions they are given, but AI agents may be trained to be blindly obedient. “Every power structure that we’ve ever had before has had to be mediated in various ways by the wills of a lot of different people,” Lazar says. “This is very much an opportunity for those with power to further consolidate that power.”
, Heather Cox Richardson
At least 80 people are dead and >40 are still missing in Central Texas after .... the Guadalupe River rose 26 feet (8 meters) in 45 minutes (at 5A on July 4th) ... observers are already pointing to the administration's cuts to government as well as the lack of systems that could have provided earlier warnings to those in the path of the floods. ... Texas officials began to blame cuts to the National Weather Service (NWS)—part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)—for causing inaccurate forecasts. The “Department of Government Efficiency” cut about 600 staffers from the NWS. After the cuts, the understaffed agency warned that “severe shortages” of meteorologists would hurt weather forecasting.
All five living former directors of the NWS warned in May that the cuts “[leave] the nation’s official weather forecasting entity at a significant deficit…just as we head into the busiest time for severe storm predictions like tornadoes and hurricanes…. Our worst nightmare is that weather forecast offices will be so understaffed that there will be needless loss of life.” ... the problem appeared to be that NWS had lost the staffers who would typically communicate with local authorities to spread the word of dangerous conditions. ... NWS published flash flood warnings but safety officials didn’t send out public warnings until hours later.
Meanwhile, Kerr County’s most senior elected official, Judge Rob Kelly, focused on local officials, telling Flavelle that the county did not have a warning system because such systems are expensive and “[t]axpayers won’t pay for it.” ... the crisis in Texas ... has opened up questions about the public cost of those cuts. Project 2025 called for breaking up and downsizing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, claiming its six main offices—including the National Weather Service—“form a colossal operation that has become one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry and, as such, is harmful to future U.S. prosperity,” by which it meant the fossil fuel industry. ... several NWS offices across the country are so understaffed they can no longer operate around the clock, and many are no longer able to launch the weather balloons that provide critical data. ... the Trump administration's 2026 budget calls for eliminating “all of NOAA’s weather and climate research labs along with institutes jointly run with universities around the country.”
, Heather Cox Richardson
... state and local officials are meeting a “wall of silence” from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). ... Trump’s FEMA leaders have ordered FEMA personnel to stop communicating with the Office of Management and Budget, the National Security Council, members of Congress, and state and local partners, leaving those communications up to the political appointees running the agency. ...
... the impact of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and consequences of its dismantling. ... from 2001 through 2021, programs funded by USAID prevented nearly 92 million deaths in 133 countries. ... cuts the Trump administration has made to USAID will result in more than 14 million deaths in the next five years. About 4.5 million will be children under 5.
... health catastrophe is brewing in the U.S. as well, as “[t]he administration has upended the operation of almost every agency that deals with our health and medical care, leaving behind fewer staff members and programs to address critical needs, and changing policies in ways that could endanger us all.” ...cuts of 39% to the institute that researches heart disease, chronic lower respiratory diseases, and diabetes; 37% to the institute that researches cancer; 40% to the institute that researches stroke, 40% to the institute that researches Alzheimer’s; 38% to the institute that researches drug overdoses and suicide; and 36% to the institute that researches covid, flu, and pneumonia. ... Those cuts, along with the deregulation of industries that pollute our environment and the destruction of programs and agencies that address mental illness, suicide, chronic diseases, poisoning, car accidents, and drowning, Woolf writes, are putting Americans at risk. ... changes to the childhood vaccine schedule under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. threaten to bring back diseases that routine immunizations had all but eliminated in the U.S.
... cuts to the National Security Council (NSC) have created a “dysfunctional” policymaking process. The NSC is supposed to coordinate policymaking across the different parts of the government. ... Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has downsized the NSC and held so few meetings that career staffers are kept in the dark and others are jockeying for power. ... the NSC has gone from being a body that can give the president advice to one designed simply to advance the president’s agenda.
, Robert Reich
Trump’s Big Ugly Bill delivers $170 billion for border and immigration enforcement. ... ICE will add 10,000 agents to the 20,000 already on the streets. ... Its annual budget for detentions will skyrocket from $3.4 billion in the current fiscal year to $45 billion until the end of the 2029 fiscal year. That’s a 365 percent increase. ... the number of people detained in ICE facilities — numbering as of June 15 — will likely grow dramatically. A four-fold increase in the detention budget could mean a quarter of a million people locked up. ... of ICE detainees have no criminal record. Some have been hardworking members of their communities for decades.
There are 65.2 million Latinos in the United States, the vast majority of whom are citizens. Inevitably, some American citizens will be swept up, arrested, and detained. As the number of raids on workers and families escalates, ICE agents will engage in more warrantless knocks on doors, searches, and arrests. ... This giant federal police effort will be supported by a supercharged surveillance system, also financed by Trump’s Big Ugly Bill. The Department of Homeland Security is joining with the Department of Government Efficiency to create the federal government’s first national citizenship data bank. ... Palantir corporation’s software will be used to combine data gleaned from the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Social Security Administration, and the Internal Revenue Service. Meanwhile, the administration wants access to citizens’ and others’ bank account numbers and medical claims.
The regime will not limit the purpose of its growing internal police apparatus to deporting undocumented people. Trump is already attacking the citizenship of people born in the United States to parents who may or may not have been citizens at the time of their birth — so-called “birthright citizenship.” The regime is also going after naturalized citizens (born outside the United States), using a McCarthy-era law that the Justice Department then used to sniff out former Nazis who lied their way into becoming American citizens — a law that allows the Department to “denaturalize,” or strip, someone’s citizenship. ... denaturalization should be aimed at anyone who may “pose a potential danger to national security” — a standard so vague as to allow the Department to expel people from the country based on unsubstantiated claims or even on their negative opinions about Trump.
The coming expansion of Trump’s police state under the Big Ugly Bill — featuring total surveillance, 10,000 ICE agents, and a network of detention facilities — will mark an escalation of Trump’s authoritarianism — using the pretext of an immigrant crime wave that does not exist. What you can do:
1. Protect the vulnerable. If anyone in your community is confronted by ICE agents demanding proof of citizenship, make sure they know they have a right to remain silent and to refuse consent to searches of their cars, homes, or persons. Red cards with this and other pertinent information are available in various languages. You can download and print them for free
.2. Make sure you know your own rights. If stopped, you are not required to answer questions. You can refuse a search of your person, car, or belongings. If the agents proceed with a search despite your refusal, make it clear you do not consent. If you’re not under arrest, you can ask if you are free to go. If the answer is yes, leave. If you or someone in your community believes rights have been violated, document everything you can of the encounter with ICE agents.
3. Finally, know that the purpose of Trump’s police state is to silence not just immigrants but the rest of us. Do not be intimidated or discouraged from speaking out, writing, demonstrating, boycotting, or undertaking any other nonviolent action in opposition to what the regime is doing. ... become even more active. Share any abuses you witness (and, ideally, have recorded on your phone) as widely as possible, so that more people are apprised of what’s happening and are ready to join the resistance. Be safe. Be careful. Have courage. Hug your loved ones.
13July2025
, More Perfect Union Video
Dems Gave Up on Everyday Americans
, The Atlantic
"Politics is a challenge for human coordination. People want to participate in political action only if others do as well. Those who believe in self-governance must signal to other people that they wish to participate, that they believe in one form of politics or another. We must watch one another—not just through social media or a news channel—to learn what we believe. And we must be willing to speak up ourselves. This is the way to form common knowledge about what other Americans truly think and want. And this is the underappreciated value of protests."
, The Guardian
"Right now, that means challenging the ’s second-term agenda ... advancing legislation that would slash Medicaid, food assistance and public education, while simultaneously giving tax breaks to some of the wealthiest Americans – or what Barber has simply called “policy murder”, a wholesale dismantling of services for the poor and vulnerable. .... Organizers passed protest signs ... Fund Life, Not Death. Our Faith Demands Justice, Not Policy Murder. Handouts followed: 13.7 million people are at risk of losing health insurance. Eleven million at risk of losing food assistance. Billions redirected from public programs to tax breaks for corporations, defense contractors and deportation forces. ... what Barber calls a “big, bad, ugly, disgusting, deadly budget” ... “We gather here not in protest alone ... but in prophetic power. We stand not just as people of faith, but as stewards of moral memory. Injustice has written itself into the budget lines, and silence is not an option when lives hang in the balance of a ledger. ... There can be no healing of the soul of America without healing the body, ... Not while people are starving. Not while they’re uninsured. Not while injustice is passed off as fiscal responsibility. ... We’re not gonna sit here and let healthcare die ... We’re not gonna sit here and let living wages die. We’re not gonna sit here and let democracy die. It’s time to live. It’s time to stand. It’s time to speak. To protest. To live justice." Fusion organizing in 2025 isn’t theory – it’s practice. Amazon workers marching with choirs in Alabama. Climate activists linking arms with veterans on Capitol Hill. Disability advocates and union reps shaping policy in North Carolina. Barber’s once-local campaign is now connected with movements across the country, from Georgia’s voting rights drives to Los Angeles’s housing struggles. Barber’s protest is grounded not in outcome, but in obligation. He’s asked: what will you do with the breath you have left? For Barber, that’s not just a question. It’s a way to keep moving. “This country gets amnesia,” he told me. “We forget. That’s why prophetic work is not about a moment. It’s about building a memory that resists the lie. ... I don’t want people to follow me, I want them to follow the truth,”
, The Guardian
Congestion pricing revenue ... is on track to reach $500m this year, allowing upgrades to the subway, the purchase of several hundred new electric buses and improvements to regional rail. ... people are still flocking to Manhattan stores, restaurants and Broadway shows, with pedestrian activity up 8% in May compared with the same month last year. Subway visits have also increased by 7%.
, Rebecca Solnit
The United States is being destroyed from within, and mainstream journalism isn't making that clear. ... too many of the powerful voices in this country are downplaying the crisis we're in, and that tamps down the reactions that could save us. ... The mainstream media are overall failing to raise the alarm, failing to connect the dots, failing to show how all the injuries, in the metaphor above, add up to profound danger to the nation's people, its institutions, and its environment. And maybe global stability, economically, ecologically, and politically. ... Two things under attack are the rule of law and the separation of powers, but the impact is largely downplayed. ... CE is given a shocking amount of money in the BBB, and the apparent plan is to have an unaccountable, lawless gangster army rove the streets of this country. I have not seen mainstream media stories on what this could look like, but I know authoritarianism comes when the authoritarian sweeps aside all limits on his power, all forms of accountability. ...
There are two topics in this essay, the destruction wrought by the Trump Administration and the ways the press has played it down. ... They're, for example, going light on the dismantling of major parts of our national security. Where's the follow-up to this Reuters from earlier this year? "US suspends some efforts to counter Russian sabotage as Trump moves closer to Putin." Or this AP ? "Dismantling of federal efforts to monitor election interference creates opening for foreign meddling." Take this: NBC a few months ago, "17 family members of cartel leaders crossed into the U.S. last week as part of a deal between a son of the former head of the Sinaloa Cartel and the Trump administration." How did this gift to the notorious El Chapo's son not blow up, or rather how did the news industry tamp it down? ... They're downplaying Trump's massive corruption of his office as he rakes in huge sums through cryptocurrency scams and in exchange for access. Rolling Stone reports, "crypto now accounts for a majority of, and his administration has made every effort to deregulate the digital asset economy.
Rolling Stone, Wired, The New Republic, and Mother Jones are among the magazines doing really good reporting on the crisis, not least because they lack the fear of calling things by their true names that afflicts legacy media. A lot of independent online journalists, historians, and critics – including Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo, Heather Cox Richardson's Letters from an American, Marisa Kabas's The Handbasket, Anand Giridharadas's The Ink – are also doing really great news-g athering, commentary, and connecting of dots. ... But their impact is comparatively limited, and the sedatives and distractions and dilutions delivered by big newspapers and networks are playing as big or bigger a role in the inadequate response to this crisis as are the outright propaganda and lies of rightwing media ...
This country is a political system, a government, a system of laws that are being broken and corrupted and degraded daily. It's an economy that's maybe heading toward a crash. It is also its people, and more and more of us are enduring one or another or several varieties of direct harm or facing the looming threat of it. This country is also its land and nature, and they too are under attack, from the national parks and forests to environmental regulations and climate programs.
, Nonprofit Quarterly
1. Rebuilding a Sense of Citizenship
Given growing misinformation and disinformation…mandatory civics and media literacy classes throughout the middle and high school years are needed.
Many countries have mandatory military service, and some of these include a service component. What I am proposing would focus on the service end, while making space for young people to choose enlisting in the military to satisfy the requirement. This effort could be modeled on the existing program, which incidentally across the United States. Young people’s work could also be directed to our national and state parks, similar to Roosevelt’s .
There are many models, including existing Peace Corps and AmeriCorps programs in the United States. Some have existed for a long time. Mexico’s program is called ; it was established in 1936 to engage university students in reconstructing the country after the Mexican Revolution. Other countries with civilian service programs Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, and Chile.
2. Supporting Children
3. Building a Stronger Safety Net
The United States has suffered gravely from growing income and wealth inequality, but that means more can be collected from the beneficiaries.
4. Environment: Far more could be said here about the need to address the climate crisis, but I will be brief. A released in 2024 from the office of Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and Representative Ocasio-Cortez outlines how existing legislation passed during the Biden administration, notably the and the , could, if leveraged appropriately—advance many national climate justice goals.
How to Pay for What We Need
Where can the money come from to implement these initiatives? It is no great mystery that the United States has suffered gravely from, but that means more can be collected from the beneficiaries of this inequality. Here are three such measures.
Moving Forward
What’s listed above is not comprehensive, but it’s a start. I hope it might spur further discussion.
, The Atlantic
500 tons of emergency food—enough to feed about 1.5 million children for a week in Afghanistan & Pakistan is set to be incinerated. ) … Since Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency disbanded USAID and the State Department subsumed the agency, no money or aid can move without the approval of the new heads of American foreign assistance...memos requesting approval to move the food never got a response ... Over the coming weeks, the food will be destroyed at a cost of $130,000 to American taxpayers (on top of the $800,000 used to purchase the biscuits) ... Despite the administration’s repeated promises to continue food aid, ... even more food could soon expire. ... more than 60,000 metric tons of food—much of it grown in America, and all already purchased by the U.S. government—were then sitting in warehouses across the world. That included 36,000 pounds of peas, oil, and cereal, which were stored in Djibouti and intended for distribution in Sudan and other countries in the Horn of Africa. ... But even if the Trump administration decides tomorrow to buy more food aid—or simply distribute what the government already owns while the food is still useful—it may no longer have the capacity to make sure anyone receives it.
27July2025
Authoritarianism 101
Mass Defiance & Civil Resistance
,
The Trump Tax will cost the poorest 10% of households $1,600 a year while raising the income of the richest 10% of Americans by $12,000 a year. 17 million Americans are losing their health care coverage. More than 22 million working families could lose some of their food benefits. This law will affect all of us. The Trump Tax will explode the deficit by $3.3 trillion — leading to higher inflation, higher energy bills, and higher grocery and prescription drug costs. Experts warn that Trump has put us on a collision course with an economic crisis.
, Your Local Epidemiologist Substack
This is the power of public research. When done well, it doesn’t just answer questions; it builds community, capacity, and long-term change for a healthier future. ... In just six months, more than 5,500 research projects have been halted. ... Thousands of communities left behind. Researchers stuck in limbo. And a generation of training lost. ... The Congressional budget has proposed an additional 40% cut to the NIH. NIH is the most in the Health and Human Services discretionary budget. To say that scientific discovery is being stripped to the bare bones is an understatement. ... . (
is an ongoing database of cuts.) ... If the NIH budget proposal moves forward, 200,000 jobs will be lost, resulting in $46 billion in economic losses. For each $1 invested in NIH, it returns $2.56 in local economies. ... NIH has long been the invisible force powering vaccines, cancer therapies, diagnostics, and public health breakthroughs. However, that very invisibility—science’s failure to communicate its impact on people’s lives in ways they can see and feel—has made it vulnerable. For decades, much of science communication has lived behind paywalls, wrapped in jargon, distant from the communities it’s meant to serve, even though their tax dollars fund it.Here are three starting points for reform: Engage the public. Streamline applications. Balance funding across disciplines. There are many , like workforce improvements and exploring new funding models. ... Your voice matters. The FY 2026 budget is still under negotiation and it’s not too late to stop these cuts. Staffers have informed me that it is particularly important to get people calling; a push from constituents before a vote can significantly influence senators’ decisions to vote yes or no. ... And remember, the community is not merely a research target but an active partner. So if you’re a scientist or researcher, share stories:
, Ezra Klein Video
Biden passed the most ambitious climate legislation in American history. Trump just shredded it. What does that mean for the future of renewable energy in America? Where does the climate movement go from here? And is it too late for us to avert climate catastrophe? Excellent video!
The Trump Administration, Congressional Republicans, and their billionaire allies officially passed their Billionaire Tax Scam—their plan to cut taxes for the rich at the expense of working people. Now is the time to call out what this law really is and what the impact will be: an egregious plan to slash programs families rely on to pay for more billionaire tax breaks and lawless immigration raids. This is likely the most important time to control the narrative about what just happened. We need to flood the zone with what this bill does and keep our message loud and clear: the Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans just cut your healthcare and raised your costs in order to give massive tax cuts to billionaires.
The onslaught of news, the chaos coming out of the White House – it’s all meant to overwhelm us. It’s a deliberate strategy to sow confusion and make us believe we are powerless to fight back. The antidote: Coming together in community to process what’s happening, to sift through what’s important and what’s just noise, and coalesce around strategies for fighting back. Join Indivisible co-founders Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin each week, as we carve out an hour to discuss what’s happening and – more importantly – what’s the plan.
Urge your state's Democratic attorney general to stop ICE overreach and protect the right to dissent
3August2025
, Robert Reich
“Hope ... [is] an ability to work for something because it is good, not just because it stands a chance to succeed.” Vaclav Havel
Trump and his MAGA stooges in Congress have passed legislation to strip health care from 10 million people; cut food stamp benefits for 40 million Americans, half of them children; slash $8 billion from lifesaving foreign aid programs; defund public radio and television stations nationwide; kill hundreds of thousands of clean energy jobs; and hand $4.5 trillion in tax breaks to Trump and his billionaire friends. And that’s not nearly all of the damage.
All true. But if the conversations end there, they can be spiritually suffocating because they don’t include the work that we must do — work to protect the vulnerable, work to end his regime, work to change America so that a demagogue like him can never again take control. We must do this work, not because it will succeed — I believe it will, but that’s not the point. We must do this work because, as Havel said, it is good.
, Jennifer Rubin
Kleptocracy of this nature, heretofore seen in places like Russia, has come home in the disgusting, piggish and—in the eyes of many experts—illegal use of the White House to enrich Trump and his family.
, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) documented 100 instances of blatant corruption including “a private dinner with Trump himself—and a special tour of the White House—for the top 220 of his meme coin, permitting Trump and his family to profit both from the run up in the value of the coin AND the increase in trading on the Trump platform”; ... Trump’s profiteering on the alone has raised and violations of the emoluments clause. As the nonpartisan Public Citizen put it in investigations and regulations: “All available signs point to Donald Trump trading deregulation of the crypto industry in exchange for personal and political enrichment.…As is often the case with this administration, the corruption and scandal is happening out in the open, right in front of our eyes.”
pay-to-play on a scale of this magnitude. “[L]obbyists, political consultants and others in the influence industry have capitalized on Mr. Trump’s aggressive fund-raising while in office to deliver for clients and earn chits with a president who keeps close tabs on who is delivering cash and listens to their appeals.” ...
Pro-democracy advocates might also keep a running total of Trump’s ill-gotten gains, commit to investigating and permanently banning from government contracting those individuals and entities that engaged in illegal activity, prosecute any violations of the Corrupt Practices Act and other white collar crimes that Trump let slide (including improper conduct by representatives of foreign powers), and appoint a special counsel to pursue all criminal and civil avenues available to disgorge from Trump largesse improperly accumulated during his tenure.
In addition, Democrats certainly should commit to anti-corruption legislation that imposes stiff penalties on anyone, including all members of the executive branch, who participates in or enable deals that use the power of their offices to get rich. Given the Trump example, we apparently need a law mandating that presidents put their holdings in a blind trust and cease private business operations while in office.
17August2025
, Robert Reich
A large portion of America has felt bullied and harassed for decades. They’ve worked their asses off but haven’t gotten anywhere. Employers have fired them without cause or notice, made them into contract workers without any security or rights, spied on them during working hours, and otherwise treated them like children.
They’ve been bullied by landlords who keep hiking their rent. By banks that keep adding large fees to whatever they owe. By health insurers and hospitals that charge them an arm and a leg. By corporate grocery monopolies that push up food prices.
Many of them voted for Trump because he promised he’d be their bully. He blamed others — immigrants, people of color, transgender people, foreign traders — for what they endured. He thereby found scapegoats for their deep feelings of powerlessness, vulnerability, and shame. It’s one of the oldest of demagogic tricks.
Democrats could have put the blame where it belonged — on monopolistic corporations and billionaires that abused their wealth and power by taking over our politics.
Democrats could have demanded higher taxes on big corporations and the wealthy to pay for childcare and eldercare. Tougher antitrust laws to break up monopolies. Labor law reforms that made it easier for workers to form unions and gain bargaining power. Universal health care. Strict regulation of big banks so they couldn’t shaft average people. And an end to big money in our politics.
But they have not — not loudly, not with one voice, not with the clarity the people need to hear.
The good news is they still can. They must. And we must push them to.
Trump is the culmination and consequence of decades of worsening inequality and corruption.
We could not have remained on the road we were on. Now that we see what we have reaped by allowing these trends to continue, we have a chance of summoning the political will to reverse them.
If there’s a silver lining on these darkening clouds, this is it.
Be well. Be safe. Hug your loved ones.
, Robert Reich video
, Indivisible.org
Download our printable signs — one designates a private area for employees that ICE cannot enter without a judicial warrant, and others show public solidarity with immigrants. Print them, bring them to businesses, and help send a clear message that our community stands together against fear and intimidation.
The onslaught of news, the chaos coming out of the White House – it’s all meant to overwhelm us. It’s a deliberate strategy to sow confusion and make us believe we are powerless to fight back. The antidote: Coming together in community to process what’s happening, to sift through what’s important and what’s just noise, and coalesce around strategies for fighting back. Join Indivisible co-founders Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin each week, as we carve out an hour to discuss what’s happening and – more importantly – what’s the plan.
30August2025
, Timothy Snyder
One is that resistance is patriotic. Everything that we do to oppose American authoritarianism we do not just in the name of defending freedom, but in the name of preserving America as such. In the swirl of destruction that is underway, it is impossible to know what will crack first, and how the collapse will begin. But what we do know is that the thing that comes next, the better America, can rest only on the labor that we perform now, on the good that we do now.
The other lesson is that resistance is constructive. It can seem difficult to resist merchants of calamity such as Trump and Vance. No one action seems to stop them. But every act of resistance creates the possibility that the country itself can survive, and every moment of hope creates the foundation for a better republic. The actions we take have to be actions against, against what is being done to us now. But by their nature every strike, every protest, every act of organization, every act of kindness and solidarity are also actions for, for a future in which the United States continues to exist, and in which the learning from resistance becomes the politics of freedom.
, Corbin Trent Substack
Make Life Affordable
Hold Power Accountable
Fix Democracy To Govern
, Tom Hartmann
Voters don’t rally behind policy papers: they rally behind leaders they can see and believe in. Democrats must end the era of weak, divided messaging and rise with a chorus of commanding voices… And they must begin now. Not in 2027 when the next campaign is already underway, not in 2028 when it’ll be too late, but today. Governors, senators, mayors, party leaders must convene, assign portfolios, step into the spotlight, and begin the disciplined work of shaping the public imagination.
, Paul Krugman Substack, Climate Scientist Michael Mann & Vaccine Scientist Peter Hotez
(read transcript or watch video)
Mann: ... “what do we need to do to turn back this assault on science and reason and democracy and everything that we might hold dear?” ... “what's the big thing we can do?” The big thing is reclaiming our politics, right? That means turning out and voting, voting for climate-forward, science-forward politicians. It means using our voice, in every way possible, to combat against this parallel universe that the Right has created in the podcast world. ... We have to create a culture, a community that can rival that. Because if we don't, again, if we don't do that, if we don't match what they're doing, if we don't fight fire with fire, we know where this leads, and it's not to a good place.
Hotez: Another reason we wrote the book is to educate people about what this whole anti-science empire is like, because I think too often it's sort of promoted as misinformation or infodemic, like just some random junk out there on the internet. We detail why that's not the case. It's organized, is deliberate, it's politically and financially motivated. So that's point one. Just getting educated about that I think is the first step.
I think a second is for the scientific community to be more out there. I think too often scientists are invisible.
... trying to find ways to encourage scientists to be out there in the public domain and not getting one hand tied behind their back by the research universities and academic health centers. They like to control their brand and don't particularly like scientists speaking out, and they don't encourage it. I think that by being invisible, it allows the bad actors to portray us as sort of shadowy figures and white coats plotting nefarious things. The best way I think to fix that is to put us out there and make people understand that we worry about picking up our kids at school and paying bills and everything else. ...
Mann: This is the reason for the current assault on academia, right? It's not coincidental. It's not accidental. This is one of the last remaining institutions that's in a position to speak truth to power. That's a threat to the bad actors that we're dealing with today. And so those of us within academia need to do everything we can to make sure that our administrations observe and respect the bedrock principles upon which these institutions were based.
Climate / Environment
18May2025
, RMI
Taxonomies are useful for seeing similarities and differences across approaches, but by linking certain approaches, they also restrict our ability to see other, alternative groupings. Here, we propose a new way of understanding the CDR ecosystem that steps outside of existing CDR taxonomies and instead looks at the flow of a carbon atom through its removal lifecycle. We believe that, by stepping outside of the conventional taxonomic mindset, this method of thinking has the potential to unlock scientific breakthroughs, commercial synergies, and non-technical barriers.
As we collect more information about the flow of carbon from left to right across this flowchart, we will be able to make the connecting lines scaled proportionally to the volume of carbon flowing through each connection. Sankey diagrams like this are already used to help people understand and make decisions about complex fields . By building towards an analogous representation of the current and future CDR field, it will be easier to allocate limited resources (such as waste biomass) across categories and to understand the implications of supporting different processes across the three steps of the flow diagram.
The flowchart taxonomy is not meant to be definitive; instead, it is meant to show the power of looking at the same space with a new light. Other taxonomies and representations may be equally helpful for thinking about financing, policy, or RD&D in new ways. As the CDR ecosystem continues to mature and expand, researchers, funders, and entrepreneurs should consider the other ways in which the CDR ecosystem can be parsed, as these may lead to exciting new technical breakthroughs, commercial possibilities, and means of communicating specific messages to different audiences.
, Inside Climate News
A new report draws on decades of internal documents and court records to lay out how some of the world’s most powerful corporations misled the public about the dangers of climate change—and how their efforts to avoid responsibility for the harms caused by their products have evolved in recent years.
The documents and records cited in , released Wednesday by the watchdog group Union of Concerned Scientists, have been reported on previously. But the report’s authors say they are the first to aggregate and analyze those documents in a comprehensive way.
“This report puts together, in one place, a powerful body of evidence about what the fossil fuel corporations knew—and when—about the climate impacts of their products, and what they did in spite of what they knew,” said Kathy Mulvey, a report author and accountability campaign director for the Climate and Energy Program at UCS.
Mulvey said the report should add heft to dozens of lawsuits pending worldwide against fossil fuel companies over their contribution to climate change.
Newer industry efforts outlined in the report include attempts to block that would make polluters pay for climate-related damage, a to rebrand environmentally conscious investing as “woke capitalism” and efforts to revive a 2018 attempt to obtain a blanket waiver of legal liability from Congress.
“In the current political context, we have reason to believe that the fossil fuel industry and its allies will attempt yet again to pass some form of liability waiver and get off scot-free for decades of deception, pollution, and massive damage to people and the planet,” the report said.
“Congress must do everything in its power to ensure such an effort does not succeed.”
, Canary Media
“Totally unworkable” rules could kill manufacturing and clean energy investment by restricting tax credits for any project remotely tied to China, experts warn. ... Tucked into the House Republicans’ released on Monday is a poison pill for U.S. clean energy developers and manufacturers, one that energy and tax policy experts say would essentially repeal the hundreds of billions of dollars of tax credits now flowing to energy projects and solar, battery, and EV factories across the country. ... If passed into law, this piece of the House Ways and Means Committee proposal would undermine investor confidence in financing the buildout of new clean-energy projects and factories, experts say. It could also erode the tax-credit eligibility of solar, wind, battery, geothermal, nuclear, and other zero-carbon energy developments under construction, and the eligibility of factories that are already online and churning out batteries, solar panels, and other clean energy products. ...
The combination of FEOC restrictions, accelerated cutoffs for claiming tax credits, and other changes proposed by the House Ways and Means bill — including ending tax-credit transferability rules that have — will equate to , ...
The Ways and Means Committee bill is one of a number of legislative proposals being worked out by House committees this week in advance of this month. Republicans have in Medicaid and food assistance programs in order to that will primarily benefit wealthy individuals and corporations and . That makes the tax credits a tempting target since repealing them could by hundreds of billions of dollars.
, Canary Media
House Republicans introduced legislation on Monday that would gut the Inflation Reduction Act. If the proposed rules become law, it will lead to more greenhouse gas emissions — and threaten hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of economic development in regions represented in Congress by Republicans.
A vast majority of the clean energy projects announced after the Inflation Reduction Act was enacted benefit Republican-led congressional districts, per the latest update from the , a joint project from research firm Rhodium Group and experts at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Since the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law in August 2022, companies have invested a total of about $320 billion into clean energy projects in the U.S. and plan to spend more than $500 billion on top of that to build cleantech factories, low-carbon industrial facilities, and installations of solar, batteries, and other renewables. Nearly 80% of the dollars already spent went to Republican districts, and three-quarters of planned investment will go to those areas.
As law, the Ways and Means proposal could derail a lot of that outstanding spending — and even some of the projects already under construction or operational.
Those declines in clean-energy and EV adoption would mean less demand for manufacturers who plan to build factories to produce electric vehicle batteries, solar panels, wind transmission cables, and other cleantech in the States. They would have to reevaluate whether their factories still make sense under an entirely different set of economic conditions — and it’s likely that the answer would be “no” for many.
, Wired
General Motors is bringing in potentially groundbreaking new battery tech that not only has 30 percent more energy density at the existing production cost for cells but also would circumvent China's stranglehold on intellectual property for EV batteries. The company even claims this new type of battery pack could lower the cost of its so they're comparable to their gasoline counterparts.
The LMR cells, however, substitute manganese—which is cheaper and more globally plentiful—for some of the pricier nickel and virtually all of the cobalt. They are, Oury said, 60 to 70 percent manganese, 30 to 40 percent nickel, and only up to 2 percent cobalt.
, NYTimes
Almost immediately after the tolls — charging most vehicles $9 to enter Manhattan from 60th Street south to the Battery — they began to alter traffic patterns, commuter behavior, transit service, even the sound of gridlock and the on-time arrival of school buses.
In March, the tolls in net revenue, putting the program on track to generate roughly $500 million in its first year.
, PV Magazine
About are dedicated to corn growing for ethanol fuel in the U.S. Roughly 38% of U.S. corn harvested is used for ethanol fuel, rather than food.
A study from Department of Natural Resources and the Environment of Cornell University published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that solar PV generates the same amount of energy as corn ethanol in just 3.2% of the land-use footprint. In other words, the energy generated by one hectare of utility-scale solar would require about 31 hectares of corn-ethanol to produce the same amount energy. Find the methodology.
, AP News
The world’s biggest corporations have caused $28 trillion in damage, a new study estimates as part of an effort to make it easier for people and governments to hold companies financially accountable, like the have been.
A Dartmouth College research team came up with the estimated pollution caused by 111 companies, with more than half of the total dollar figure coming from 10 : Saudi Aramco, Gazprom, Chevron, ExxonMobil, BP, Shell, National Iranian Oil Co., Pemex, Coal India and the British Coal Corporation.
For comparison, $28 trillion is a shade less than the sum of all goods and services produced in the United States last year.
Northwest Climate Resilience Collaborative Terminated by NOAA
We are deeply saddened to report that the Acting Director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s Grants Management Division sent a letter on May 5th terminating the (NCRC), effective immediately. The NCRC, a NOAA Climate Adaptation Partnership (CAP) program, was the Climate Impacts Group (CIG)’s largest source of funding to work with rural communities and Tribes across Washington, Oregon, and Idaho to adapt and build resilience to climate impacts such as extreme heat, flooding, drought, and sea level rise.
CIG has hosted the NCRC, a collaboration among academic institutions and Tribal- and community-based organizations, since 2021. Our current five-year award was planned to run through August 2026, at which point, under normal circumstances, we would recompete for another five-year award. The NCRC, which represents about 25 percent of the total work conducted at CIG,
The termination of NCRC is a major blow to climate adaptation and community-based resilience in the Northwest. In recent discussions and previous reviews of our annual reports, NOAA and bipartisan congressional staff have recognized the importance of the NCRC, and the NOAA CAP program that funds it, because of our tangible, positive impacts in local communities. Our work has ranged from supporting farmers in Idaho facing the dual stressors of drought and land use change, to informing Washington state legislation to save lives during extreme heat events, to working with coastal Tribes in Oregon and Washington as they respond to sea level rise and other climate threats.
In a testimonial in support of our work, Patrick Freeland of the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians stated, “[The NCRC] Tribal coastal resilience (TCR) portfolio centers Tribal sovereignty, and platforms Tribal leadership. The TCR team continuously practices a thoughtful, contemplative, and respectful approach, informed by the experiences and decision-making authority of knowledge-holders who offer insights that guide the work. This is a clear model of the convergence of many sciences, disciplines, and traditional knowledges to effectively understand and responsibly address real-world problems.”
We want to thank and recognize our NCRC partners at Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, American Farmland Trust, Front and Centered, Gonzaga University’s Climate Institute, Headwaters Economics, Portland State University, Washington Sea Grant, Washington State University, and Western Washington University, who are all affected by this decision. Despite this setback, the Climate Impacts Group stands by our commitment to working in partnership to support equitable climate adaptation in the Northwest and beyond.
25May2025
, Senator Adam Schiff
... and .
, Project Drawdown
Positive emotions like joy, hope and compassion have been shown across various studies to increase climate action. ... climate communications that engage people in joyful emotional states may be the most effective in increasing climate action ... ... So where we want to be and where we want to be kind of as a society is in what we call the window of tolerance or other people call it the zone of resilience ... This place in the middle where we can be open and curious and present. ... Scientists have figured out through careful experiments that in order to effectively offset negativity bias we need about three pieces of good news for every one piece of bad news in order to balance the scales ...
, Spokesman-Review
Spokane’s most vulnerable residents will no longer have assistance in preparing for the devastating effects of climate change, if the Trump administration follows through on its intent to rescind nearly $20 million in federal funding.... the Environmental Protection Agency notified Gonzaga University on May 2 of the impending cancellation of a , according to a joint news release from the city of Spokane and the private Jesuit school decrying the move.
$19.9 million grant devoted to climate resiliency in Spokane’s disadvantaged, low-income communities
Hundreds of low-income homes were to be retrofitted with heat pumps and high-quality air filtration systems, five community centers and libraries were going to be bolstered to serve as extreme weather shelters, and several prospective workers were to be trained for jobs in clean energy – all as a result of the funding.
“We are concerned not only about the process by which this decision was made, but even more so about its very real consequences for the people we serve,” Gonzaga President Thayne McCulloh said in a statement. “Our mission is to educate and serve. This grant enables our community to learn how to deal with dangerous climate conditions and help the thousands of community members who lack the ability to protect themselves from the extreme heat and wildfire smoke that is all too common in the Inland Northwest today.”
Nearly 95% of the grant funding was devoted to tangible services and infrastructure improvements, like the establishment of extreme weather shelters and upgrades to qualifying houses, the release states. The Gonzaga Institute for Climate, Water, and the Environment was the lead recipient and pass-thru administrator for the funds, but the work was to be spread among several nonprofits and civic bodies, including Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners, the city of Spokane, Spokane Public Library and the Carl Maxey Center.
, Inside Climate News
Upper West Side in NYC has been the home of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, .... on April 24, NASA informed scientists working at the institute that the agency’s tenure at the location was about to end. ... Federal climate and Earth scientists are facing widespread budget and staffing cuts in the Trump administration’s push to dismantle vast swaths of the government. ...
The Trump administration recently proposed a budget that seeks to cut 24 percent of the agency’s funding, putting a range of locations and the programs within at risk, ...
, 350 Seattle Petition
Dirty energy CEOs met with Trump behind closed doors, asking for total protection from any efforts by cities and states to hold them accountable for their climate crimes.
Climate-fueled disasters like floods, fires, hurricanes, and heat waves are on the rise, uprooting lives and livelihoods and costing states and taxpayers billions of dollars. That's why a growing number of cities and states are filing lawsuits or passing new legislation that would make the fossil fuel industry pay its fair share for climate damages. The fossil fuel industry is turning to its friends in Congress, demanding a “liability waiver,” which is a “get out of jail free” card.
, Heatmap
The Republican megabill will make climate change worse. Within a year or two, the U.S. will be pumping out half a megaton more carbon pollution per year than it would in a world where the IRA remains on the books, ...
What does America get for this increase in air pollution? .. Repealing the tax credits from GDP over the next decade, ... Texas will be — it could lose up to $100 billion in energy investment. Across the country, household energy costs by 2035, on top of any normal market-driven volatility, ... The country will become more reliant on foreign oil imports, yet domestic oil production will budge up by less than 1%.
In other words, in exchange for more pollution, Americans will get less economic growth but higher energy costs.
Republicans are now trying to remove these tax bonuses in order to finance tax cuts for high-earning households. But removing the IRA alone won’t pay for the tax credits, so they will also have to borrow trillions of dollars. This is already , driving up interest rates for Americans. Indeed, a U.S. Treasury auction earlier this week for $16 billion in bonds, driving stocks and the dollar down while spiking treasury yields.
Higher interest rates will make it more expensive to build any kind of new power plant. At a moment of maximum stress on the grid, the U.S. is going to pull away tax bonuses for new electricity supply and make it more expensive to do any kind of investment in the power system. ... significant risk exists for runaway energy cost chaos.
House Republicans have stripped virtually every demand-side subsidy for electric vehicles from the bill, including a $7,500 tax credit for personal EV purchases. ... This will reduce the economic rationale for much of the current buildout in electric vehicle manufacturing and capacity happening across the country — it could potentially put every new EV and battery factory meant to come online after this year . ... This will weaken the country’s economic competitiveness. Batteries are a , and they will undergird many of the most important general and military technologies of the next several decades. ... they will increase the risks that the United States simply gives up on ever understanding battery technology and doubles down on internal combustion vehicles — a technology that, like coal-powered naval ships, is destined to lose.
... It is risky to make the power grid so exposed to natural gas price volatility. It is risky to jack up the federal deficit during peacetime for so little gain. It is risky to cede so much demand for U.S.-sourced critical minerals. It is risky to raise interest rates in an era of higher trade barriers, uncertain supply shocks, and geopolitical instability.
Alerts & Petitions,
Lung Action Network,
Save Medicaid & Clear Air Programs
Lung Health Insider Newsletter
EMPHASIZE THE CLEAN ENERGY BOOM: Clean energy is driving job creation, reducing energy costs, improving public health, and supporting economic development. Partner with businesses, schools, labor groups, and nonprofits to amplify messaging that matters locally.
LOCAL STORIES ARE ESSENTIAL: To communicate impact effectively, focus on the what, who, how, and why — tell real, personal stories that illustrate how clean energy programs benefit individuals, schools, businesses, and underserved communities.
USE DATA, MAPS, AND DIRECT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TO FIND AND SHARE STORIES: Leverage tools like the , and the to find clean energy projects near you.
, ecoAmerica
1June2025
, Just Have A Think
New research paper suggests an ice-free Arctic Ocean might be less than FIVE years away.
, The Nature Conservancy
, Bill McKibben
The Trump administration ... official budget proposal ... essentially zeroes out research in geophysics and science funding in general. We probably won’t feel this as quickly as we’ll feel the parallel (especially as hurricane season ). But we will feel it soon enough. ... we are rushing into the most dangerous period in human history, and the Trump administration seems determined that we do it blindly. It’s inconceivably stupid, and it’s entirely real. And the planet doesn’t care: physics will not cut us any slack because we elected a moron.
, Bill McKibben
R existing clean energy projects in Texas will pay more than $12bn in taxes to communities where they are located, funding schools, roads and hospitals, while paying out another $15bn to landowners to lease their properties.
“It’s a hard life out here, there’s rocks, mesquite and coyotes and not a lot else – if there’s anything to make life easier, do it,” said Davis as he stood on his property under the whooshing blades of a wind turbine, one of a ragged line of turbines that make up the Cactus Flats wind project. ... Davis has several hundred goats and sheep and raises cattle for wagyu beef on his 1,300-acre property, but 40% of his income now comes from the wind turbines ... “I struck wind!” said the ebullient Davis, who likes to restyle Trump’s into “turn, baby, turn” in recognition of his wind turbines. ...
, Scientific American
The latest version of Grok, the chatbot created by Elon Musk’s xAI, is promoting fringe climate viewpoints in a way it hasn’t done before ... The language learning models that power AI chatbots are “really quite malleable and you can change the kind of results they give,” Dessler said. “They're not tied to any absolute truth or anything like that and if you want one to lie to you, you can tell it to do that. If you want it to give you a particular viewpoint, you can do that.” ... “Malicious people can use Grok to intentionally generate climate misinformation to sow doubt about scientific consensus or environmental movements,” ... “As we go into the future, more and more people are going to get their information from these AIs,” Dessler said. “Obviously, the concern is that someone's going to do something like this to mislead people.”
8June2025
Coming June 9-15: How does climate change affect where and how we live? The energy used to operate buildings results in more than a fourth of global carbon dioxide pollution. And climate change threatens communities with risks like floods and wildfire. So NPR is dedicating a week to stories about climate change solutions for living and building on a hotter planet.
15June2025
Economics & Climate, Kay Shields Substack
Scientists have been warning for over 50 years of planetary limits, but the economic orthodoxy has proved reluctant to acknowledge them. Most heterodox research is under-resourced, under-funded and continues to be rejected by the mainstream ...
What I know for sure, is that heterodox economists — like Keen, Parrique and many others, including many women and non-white and Global South economists — have plenty to offer. Many such economists have been challenging economic wisdom for decades, much as the mainstream may prefer to ignore them.
It is possible to envisage an economic system centred on sufficiency, where public money is used to mobilise resources where we need them — not simply to where it can make the most profit. Where human needs, especially in the over-consuming Global North, are fulfilled at far lower levels of energy and material use — because products last longer and because we are not manipulated into consuming by ads and algorithms. And where innovation is targeted towards meeting our needs while repairing and supporting our life-giving planet — not the vague goal of more growth.
, Ben Shread-Hewitt
AI is not destiny. It is a tool — a powerful, seductive, double-edged tool. In the fight against climate change, it can be a weapon in our service or one that backfires. Its future, if it is to have any hope of being a climate tool, must be wrested from cult-like visions and the devastating feedback loops that — at this time — seem hardwired into it. The choice depends not on the code itself, but on the systems we build to control it, and the institutions we task with its oversight.
Prepare for Extreme Heat, Seattle Office of Emergency Management
Be safe during a heat event
Know the signs of heat-related illnesses and ways to respond. If you are sick and need medical attention, contact your healthcare provider for advice and shelter in place if you can. If you are experiencing a medical emergency call 9-1-1.
Get more detailed information about heat-related illnesses from the
and ., Kiley Price, Inside Climate News
The agency predicts “hotter-than-average” temperatures, a trend that is becoming as climate change worsens. These high temperatures can be deadly; that heat-related deaths have more than doubled over the past 24 years. ... Medical experts have dubbed heat a “” because many people don’t realize they are in trouble until it’s too late. That’s because the symptoms can start out pretty slowly—heavy sweating, headaches or nausea—but worsen rapidly to a rash, seizure or even stroke. ... Typically, the fast air moving from fans displaces the warmer air that comes in contact with our skin, which makes it easier for sweat to evaporate and eliminate body heat. However, this research finds that when air temperatures pass 95 degrees, fans can exacerbate the transfer of heat to the body from the environment by blowing hot air on your skin. ... The Trump administration defunded NOAA’s Center for Heat Resilient Communities, an effort designed to help cities understand how heat moves through their area and how best to mitigate it, .
22June2025
Protect Clean Trucks Rules, 350 WA
Last year Washington joined 11 other states in going big to reduce diesel truck pollution—and now those efforts are under attack nationwide. State leadership on climate has never been more important. We need your help to support the Department of Ecology’s rulemaking on Advanced Clean Trucks. This month, state regulators are accepting public comment on this. The Field Team is calling on climate activists to contact the Washington Dept. of Ecology by June 20 to submit a comment regarding this rulemaking.
The following is a sample comment that you copy directly or you can customize it, then submit it
, “Chapter 173-423 WAC, Clean Vehicles Program Rulemaking Formal Comment Period”Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the updates to the Clean Truck Rules. State leadership on clean transportation has never been more important. I commend the Department of Ecology for making sure we have more clean trucks on our roads in Washington by upholding the Advanced Clean Truck (ACT) program and the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule (HDO), a crucial step in cutting diesel pollution.
Washington can demonstrate its commitment to combating pollution and protecting vulnerable communities with forward-thinking policies like ACT and HDO. There is an ongoing national effort targeted at repealing this rule and others like it by the trucking industry and manufacturers. Delaying this rule by even two years would cause $67.6-83.7 million in health costs. We can’t let polluters take away our clean air future. Every delay in clean truck policies directly impacts public health, especially for low-income communities and communities of color, who are disproportionately exposed to harmful diesel emissions.
I strongly support Ecology’s proposed rules on ACT and HDO to continue standing up to polluting special interests who seek to delay or halt progress. The Advanced Clean Truck rule is critical for Washington to meet its climate targets in law and for improving our health.
Thank you.
, The Economist
... food production in the world’s existing breadbaskets, such as the American Midwest, will be among the hardest hit, although it may improve in currently less productive northerly regions such as Canada, China and Russia. And whereas adaptation will help offset some global losses, it will not be nearly enough to avoid them overall. ... In a future without adaptation, overall yields would be expected to fall by 8.3% by 2050 and 12.7% by 2098 (compared to a hypothetical baseline where the climate does not change). ... Even if farmers on both ends of the income distribution suffer, it will ultimately be the poorest who will be left hungry. The best way to minimise that harm is to keep the flow of food as open as possible ...
, The Guardian
Rampant climate misinformation is turning the crisis into a catastrophe, according to the authors of a new report. It found climate action was being obstructed and delayed by false and misleading information stemming from fossil fuel companies, rightwing politicians and some nation states. The , from the International Panel on the Information Environment (Ipie), systematically reviewed 300 studies.
Among the findings are that the fossil fuel industry has engaged in a “dual deception” of the public, first denying the reality of climate change, obscuring its responsibility and obstructing climate action, and, second, to portray itself as an environmentally sustainable enterprise. The report says other sectors have also promoted climate misinformation: US electricity companies, animal agriculture, airlines, tourism, and fast food.
, Seattle Times
This summer will be an energy doozy in the U.S. as climate change exacerbates heat waves and a rash of new data centers and crypto mines comes online. But these new power vacuums arrive in concert with a stack of big batteries. America, particularly its Sun Belt, has been a gusher of renewable energy for years; now, utilities will be able to bottle up much of that sun and wind and discharge it around the clock.
In the 12 months through April — the most recent data available — energy storage in the U.S. surged from roughly 18 gigawatts to 25 gigawatts, a 41% increase, according to a Bloomberg Green analysis of federal data. In Arizona, battery bandwidth nearly tripled; in Texas, it has almost doubled. In the evening of April 8, more than 11% of Texas electricity was coming from batteries, a record.
Utilities and developers are building battery stacks because they are often the most affordable way to add capacity, essentially by stretching power generation that’s already built. The average price for stationary storage systems in 2024 was $125 per kWh, 19% lower than in 2023, according to BNEF.
Storage systems are also getting more resilient. A decade ago, industrial batteries generally discharged all of their electrons in 30 minutes or less. Today, the average system can put out energy for four hours straight, and some are tuned for cycles as high as eight hours. This means they can kick in more frequently and stay on for longer, not just during brief windows in the morning and evening.
29June2025
Energy Investors Urge Senate to Preserve IRA Tax Credits
A group of more than 70 energy investors signs an open letter to members of Congress urging the preservation of Inflation Reduction Act tax credits. ()
, Brad Plumer, NYTimes
Senate Republicans have quietly inserted provisions in President Trump’s domestic policy bill that would not only end federal support for wind and solar energy but would impose an entirely new tax on future projects, a move that industry groups say could devastate the renewable power industry. ... The bill would rapidly phase out existing federal tax subsidies for wind and solar power by 2027. Doing so, many companies say, could derail hundreds of projects under development and of dollars in manufacturing facilities that had been planned around the country with the subsidies in mind. ... Wind and solar projects are the fastest growing new source of electricity in the United States and account for expected to come online this year. For utilities and tech companies, adding solar, wind and batteries has often been to help meet soaring electricity demand. ... Scientists say that the rollback of clean energy subsidies , since wind turbines, solar panels and electric vehicles were expected to do much of the heavy lifting in cutting America’s planet-heating greenhouse gas emissions over the next decade. ...
, NYTimes
In China, more wind turbines and solar panels were installed last year than in the rest of the world combined. And China’s clean energy boom is going global. Chinese companies are building electric vehicle and battery factories in Brazil, Thailand, Morocco, Hungary and beyond. ... in the United States, President Trump is pressing Japan and South Korea to invest “
” in a project to ship natural gas to Asia. And General Motors just killed plans to make electric motors at a factory near Buffalo, N.Y., and instead will put $888 million into building V-8 gasoline engines there.The race is on to define the future of energy. Even as the dangers of global warming hang ominously over the planet, two of the most powerful countries in the world, the United States and China, are pursuing energy strategies defined mainly by economic and national security concerns, as opposed to the climate crisis. ... While China still burns more coal than the rest of the world and emits more climate pollution than the United States and Europe combined, its pivot to cleaner alternatives is happening at breakneck speed. Not only does China already dominate global manufacturing of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries, E.V.s and many other clean energy industries, but with each passing month it is widening its technological lead. ... In a full reversal from the Biden administration’s effort to pivot the American economy away from fossil fuels, the Trump White House is opening up public lands and federal waters for new drilling, fast-tracking permits for pipelines and pressuring other countries to as a way of avoiding tariffs. ... Today, China’s dominance of so many clean energy industries is enabling it to expand its sphere of influence by selling and financing energy technology around the world. These relationships allow China to forge multidecade financial, cultural and even military ties at a moment of shifting geopolitical alliances. ... The Trump administration is taking a different road. By dismantling a vast network of foreign aid programs, it has abandoned America’s longstanding strategy for projecting soft power. In its place it is taking a more transactional approach with other countries. In Saudi Arabia, for example, while the Chinese are building a battery project there, the United States recently agreed to a major arms sale, and an American company agreed to set up rare-earth mining, processing and magnet manufacturing. And it is moving aggressively to sell other countries more fossil fuels. Mr. Trump, who last year accepted more than $75 million in campaign donations from oil and gas executives, promised to “drill, baby, drill” and deliver an era of “energy dominance.” In his first few months he has tried to clear the way for more exports and to nudge foreign governments to buy more American gas.
6July2025
, Sierra Club
[GOP Budget Bill] ... an enormous cost: to the health of millions of Americans, their jobs and livelihoods, and the ongoing fight against runaway climate change. ... “This disastrous bill is the largest-ever transfer of wealth from working-class people to the wealthy,” Collin Rees, United States campaigns manager at , said in a . “It strips healthcare from 17 million people, forces kids to go to school hungry, allows corporations to further pollute our air and water, destroys thousands of clean energy jobs, and puts us all at greater risk from climate disasters—all to pay for tax cuts for billionaires and handouts to the Big Oil CEOs who bought access to Trump.” ... “Climate pollution will increase, and kids will struggle with asthma and other respiratory problems. And, more people will suffer from devastating extreme weather catastrophes,"
Margie Alt, director of the . “This travesty of a bill benefits only billionaires at the cost of every other person in this country.”
It stomps out incentives for purchasing electric vehicles and efficient appliances. It phases out tax credits for wind and solar energy. It opens up federal land and water for oil and gas drilling and increases its profitability, while creating new federal support for coal. It ends the historic investment in poor and minority communities that bear a disproportionate pollution burden—money that the Trump administration was already refusing to spend. It wipes out any spending on greening the federal government.
Al Gore
In this urgent and hard-hitting talk, Nobel Laureate Al Gore thoroughly dismantles the fossil fuel industry’s narrative of "climate realism," contrasting their misleading claims with the remarkable advancements in renewable energy. ... Gore makes a powerful case that we already have everything needed to solve the climate crisis — and reminds us of what the most valuable renewable resource actually is. (Recorded at TED Countdown Summit 2025 on June 16, 2025)
13July2025
, Pro-Publica
Climate change is making disasters more common, more deadly and far more costly, even as the federal government is running away from the policies that might begin to protect the nation. ... Across the planet, dry places are getting drier while wet places are getting wetter. The jet stream — the band of air that circulates through the Northern Hemisphere — is slowing to a near stall at times, weaving off its tracks, causing unprecedented events like polar vortexes drawing arctic air far south. Meanwhile the heat is sucking moisture from the drought-plagued plains of Kansas only to dump it over Spain, contributing to last year’s cataclysmic floods. ... What is extraordinary is that at such a volatile moment, President Donald Trump’s administration would choose not just to minimize the climate danger — and thus the suffering of the people affected by it — but to revoke funding for the very data collection and research that would help the country better understand and prepare for this moment. ...
, Bill McKibben
The era of federal support for an energy transition, supposed to last a decade under the Inflation Reduction Act, will mostly , when the cost of clean energy projects could rise by a third or more. This raises questions. Since the big [Trump-GOP] domestic policy bill that was recently passed cut the knees out from under federal support for sun, wind and batteries, how long will that dark age last, and how much damage will it do? ...
The world also now has great ways to use that electricity: the electric vehicle and the electric bike to get around, the heat pump to warm or cool your home, the induction cooktop to replace the open gas flame in your kitchen. We’re at the point where human beings could dispense with burning fossil fuels, sparing us from not only the worst of the climate crisis but also that come with breathing the pollution from all that combustion. We would save money — most estimates of the cost of the recent legislation include more than $100 a year in extra electricity costs for American families because we stay dependent on natural gas.
You may recall that during his campaign President Trump the country’s oil barons that if they donated $1 billion to help elect him, they could get a lot of what they wanted; in the end, they spent in donations, lobbying and advertising during the election cycle, and that, apparently, was enough to very nearly win them carte blanche. Not only is the administration removing environmental regulations on oil and gas drilling and pulling the funding from anything remotely green; it’s also using the threat of tariffs to countries into buying America’s natural gas. It’s an all-out effort to slow down an inevitable transition.
And so people who care about climate change need to rouse themselves from understandable despair and make a new stand. Some of us are busy organizing a nationwide event called on Sept. 21. There will be electric-vehicle parades and solar-powered concerts, ribbon cuttings at solar farms — and protests at city halls and statehouses demanding that they take the lead in shifting policies to make the energy transition easier.
The goal of all this work is to drive home the key message: Sun and wind are no longer alternative energy but the obvious path forward. And this effort can succeed, because the force of economic gravity is finally on the side of clean energy and because show that many people — despite every effort of the MAGA right — continue to love the idea of solar power. Whether we can move fast enough to change the eventual temperature of the planet is an open question, and our chances have clearly suffered a real setback. But given the stakes of the wager, doing what we can to shift the odds is clearly our job.
by Dr. Katharine Hayhoe
One of the most effective ways we can use our voice to advocate for change is by joining an organization that shares our values and put our weight behind their calls for action at the city, state, province, corporate, or national level. Here are some suggestions, organized by topic.
For parents and kids
For young people
For grandparents and the third generation
Christian?
Other faiths?
For athletes
For citizens
For hikers, gardeners, birders and other nature-lovers
Climate activism
Arts and crafts
Resources for families
Parents and families – if you’re looking for resources for your kids, here are some ideas. Please also check out for books, podcasts, and documentaries below.
1. brings a real live scientist right into your home. They typically only do classrooms but they’re opening it up to families now so check them out!
2. Our show has over 30 short episodes appropriate for kids of all ages (and parents too). Bonus activity: we are turning them into PBS Learning Units so if you want to design discussion questions and/or an activity to go with an episode, send them along and if we use them we’ll give you full credit!
3. There are already many fantastic units on for all ages and subjects. And don’t forget our sister series on YouTube, from Hot Mess to Gross Science. There’s plenty to keep kids entertained there!
4. There are lots of great online resources like and books with hands-on science experiments for kids. What better time to dig in?
5. Finally, for the high school kids and adults who want to do a deep dive into climate change, is an online course that is free for all with amazing videos and interviews with nearly every top expert in the field.
20July2025
, Ezra Klein Video
Biden passed the most ambitious climate legislation in American history. Trump just shredded it. What does that mean for the future of renewable energy in America? Where does the climate movement go from here? And is it too late for us to avert climate catastrophe? Excellent video!
3August2025
, Dr. Katharine Hayhoe
Here’s a rundown of recent setbacks.
... the Dept. of Energy put out a written by well-known climate that was full of false claims – and even one false reference, which as climate scientist Gavin Schmidt points out
, is usually a dead giveaway that they used ChatGPT to write it! – that climate change does not affect our health.
... the U.S. Energy Secretary that the administration is “revising” past National Climate Assessments (NCA) after removing the originals from government websites and claiming the reports “weren’t fair in broad-based assessments of climate change.” ... this assertion is absolutely false. After the IPCC, the NCA is the most comprehensive climate report in the world: reviewed by 12 federal agencies, the National Academy of Sciences, and the public.
... NASA has been told to
two satellite missions that monitor carbon dioxide and plant growth globally. The data from these satellites – known as the Orbiting Carbon Observatories – is used widely by scientists, farmers, and even oil and gas companies, and they have plenty of life left in them. ... These maps have proven invaluable to monitoring both crop yields and drought conditions. Putting these systems into orbit cost some $750 million, whereas maintaining them both each year costs $15 million. “Just from an economic standpoint, it makes no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data,” David Crisp, a now-retired NASA scientist who designed the instruments the OCO missions use,
NPR.
Letting a satellite burn up, rewriting trusted science, and blocking pollution rules that protect our health put us at even more risk, ... Our future depends on having more information, not less, so we can make choices that keep us safe., Dr. Katharine Hayhoe
... holding politicians accountable ... what does that really mean? .. voting. ... calling or writing your representatives at every level ... taking this fight to the courts.
All around the world, people are using the legal system to push for climate accountability.... you can follow them through , a public, searchable database of climate litigation maintained by the at Columbia University. ... By reading, sharing, and talking about these cases, you help build public awareness and political pressure. ... we make it clear: climate action isn’t optional — it’s expected.
, YouTube Alan Weiner
17August2025
, Dave Borlace of Just Have A Think
The video refutes claims that climate warnings are alarmist, emphasizing that the unfolding impacts—including more extreme weather, record-shattering heat, and health crises—are already matching or exceeding scientific "worst-case" predictions, not overstatements. ... Climate inaction, delay, or “waiting for others” is both ethically and practically indefensible. The cost of delaying action—socially, economically, and environmentally—will vastly exceed the cost of a swift, coordinated green transition. The video concludes by urging viewers to push back against misleading arguments and propaganda, and to support robust, science-based climate policies now.
, Seattle Times
While the leader of 340 million Americans furiously works to derail climate action, the leader of 1.4 billion Catholics is embracing it. .... “We must pray for the conversion of so many people, inside and out of the church, who still don’t recognize the urgency of caring for our common home,” he said, wearing an emerald robe for the occasion. “We see so many natural disasters in the world, nearly every day and in so many countries, that are in part caused by the excesses of being human, with our lifestyle.”
, Seattle Times
For decades, studies have consistently linked higher wildfire smoke exposure to increased cardiovascular and lung issues, cancer and premature death. The Forest Service’s own researchers have warned for years about the effects of smoke, calling on the agency to provide masks, monitor exposures and track long-term health outcomes for firefighters.
Extensive Resource Library
Sign-up for their ChangeLetter Newsletter
, Undecided with Matt Ferrell
This summer the United States made a $559 billion decision. The consequences of that decision could make your next car $7,500 more expensive and send your electricity bills soaring unpredictably. On July 4th, 2025, President Trump signed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" into law. But this bill that was evidently supposed to make States more self-sufficient really just gave our energy independence away. Solar alone employs nearly seven times more U.S. workers than coal. Yet the current administration is cutting hundreds of billions of dollars from the sector creating jobs. Today, I’ll explain what this big bill actually does, the staggering numbers behind its context, and how it impacts your daily life. Because regardless of your politics, we all pay electricity bills, we all need jobs, and we all want to avoid being left at the mercy of another country’s supply chain.
, EDF
Since President Trump’s return to office, his administration has purged more than 8,000 government web pages and 3,000 datasets — scrubbing climate, health and environmental justice information from sites run by the Environmental Protection Agency, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other agencies. ... In a high-stakes digital tug-of-war, a scrappy network of scientists, archivists and volunteers is racing to rescue climate and environmental data — vital information that can save lives and help steer the planet toward a safer future. Groups like the , the and are working to preserve critical federal datasets as the Trump administration purges information that runs counter to its agenda of promoting fossil fuels and undoing pollution safeguards.
Behind the scenes, a decentralized army of volunteers is preserving key federal information piece by piece. From university libraries to kitchen tables, they’re using tools like the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine and to capture disappearing content. Harvard’s Environmental and Energy Law Program helps archive complex datasets through its repository, while the sweeps up entire websites during presidential transitions.
30August2025
, Heather Cox Richardson
The Trump administration claims that relying on fossil fuels will jump-start the economy, but higher costs for electricity are already fueling inflation, and in the longer term, more expensive power will slow economic growth. In contrast, China has leaped ahead to dominate the global clean energy industry. Cheaper electricity there is expected to make it more attractive for future investment. ...
Lou Antonellis of Massachusetts International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 103, added that the cuts to renewable energy projects in the U.S. were not just cuts to funding. “[Y]ou’re pulling paychecks from working families, you’re pulling apprentices out of training facilities, you’re pulling opportunity straight out of our communities. Every solar panel installed, every wind turbine wired, every EV charger connected, that’s a job with wages, healthcare, and a pension that stands for dignity for the American worker. You don’t kill that kind of progress: you build on it.”
, Bill McKibben
On Tuesday, eighty-six climate scientists delivered a four-hundred-page response to a Department of Energy from July which had attempted to show that global warming is no big deal. ... Given that President Trump had declared climate change to be a “hoax,” and given that Energy Secretary Christopher Wright had previously declared it to be a “side effect of building the modern world,” it stands to reason that Wright’s department picked to conduct its report exactly five climate researchers, all notable for careers in which they’ve stood conspicuously outside the overwhelming scientific consensus that global warming is a grave and immediate danger. These five duly concluded, among other things, that “CO2-induced warming might be less damaging economically than commonly believed, and excessively aggressive mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial.”
... the five skeptics contended that “meteorological drought” was not increasing in the United States; as the researchers point out in their response, this is cherry-picked nonsense. In the first place, “meteorological drought” is only a measure of how much rain falls; the hotter temperatures associated with climate change have been increasing evaporation, which dries up more of that rain. And, in any event, the contrarians used the entire continental U.S. as the statistical basis for their finding, which makes no sense: as global warming increases evaporation in the arid West, it also increases rainfall in the moist East, producing the flooding rains that have caused so much damage in regions like the Appalachians.
The American scientific enterprise, the source of so much wealth and national prestige, is being unravelled before our eyes—research grants are being cut off, satellites disconnected, reports cooked up to meet the needs of particular industries and ideologies. ... But the scientific method will not, perhaps, go quietly. With hundreds of years of patient work behind it, with some educational institutions willing to protect their scientists, and with researchers hard at work in less-benighted nations, the human desire to know and to understand will continue to produce results. Many of those findings will be contrary to the interests of the blowhards who, at least temporarily, control our nation, and so they may be suppressed for the moment. But whether or not they are heeded, in the end, the truth will out. If it’s not in the form of enlightened policy, it will be in the form of pandemics and wildfires, of untreated disease and rising sea level.
, MIT Technology Review
The solar future looked bright. But in the race to commercialize the technology it invented, the US would lose resoundingly. Last year, China $40 billion worth of solar panels and modules, while America shipped just $69 million, according to the New York Times. It was a stunning forfeit of a huge technological lead. ... In its quest to prop up aging fossil-fuel industries, the Trump administration has slashed federal support for the emerging cleantech sector, handing his nation’s chief economic rival the most generous of gifts: an unobstructed path to locking in its control of emerging energy technologies, and a leg up in inventing the industries of the future.
China’s dominance of solar was no accident. In the late 2000s, the government simply determined that the sector was a national priority. Then it deep subsidies, targeted policies, and price wars to scale up production, drive product improvements, and slash costs. It’s made similar moves in batteries, electric vehicles, and wind turbines.
Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has set to work unraveling hard-won clean-energy achievements in the US, snuffing out the gathering momentum to rebuild the nation’s energy sector in cleaner, more sustainable ways. ... The tax and spending bill that Trump signed into law in early July wound down the subsidies for solar and wind power contained in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. The legislation also cut off federal support for cleantech projects that rely too heavily on Chinese materials—a hamfisted bid to punish Chinese industries that will instead .... Meanwhile, the administration has slashed federal funding for science and attacked the financial foundations of premier research universities, pulling up the roots of future energy innovations and industries.
A driving motivation for many of these policies is the quest to protect the legacy energy industry based on coal, oil, and natural gas, all of which the US is geologically blessed with. But this strategy amounts to the playing out at a national scale—a country clinging to its declining industries rather than investing in the ones that will define the future. ...
Earlier this summer, the EPA to revoke the Obama-era “endangerment finding,” the legal foundation for regulating the nation’s greenhouse-gas pollution.
The agency’s argument leans heavily on that rehashes to assert that rising emissions the harms that scientists expected. It’s a wild, Orwellian plea for you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears in a summer that saw in the Midwest and East and is now in wildfire smoke.
Over the weekend, more than 85 scientists sent a point-by-point, 459-page rebuttal to the federal government, highlighting myriad ways in which the report “is biased, full of errors, and not fit to inform policy making,” as Bob Kopp, a climate scientist at Rutgers, on Bluesky.
“The authors reached these flawed conclusions through selective filtering of evidence (‘cherry picking’), overemphasis of uncertainties, misquoting peer-reviewed research, and a general dismissal of the vast majority of decades of peer-reviewed research,” the dozens of reviewers .
Wealth Inequality / Economy / Business
18May2025
, Paul Krugman ☼
The reality is that we’ve gone from a completely insane tariff rate on imports from China to a rate that’s merely crazy. And China accounts for only a fraction of our imports. Tariffs on everyone else are still at 10 percent, a level we haven’t seen in generations. And there are still other shoes to drop: Trump has, for example, been promising tariffs on pharmaceuticals.
The trade war is still very much on. Anyone who reports otherwise (a) hasn’t done their homework (b) is misleading the public. And while the stock market has to some extent bought into unwarranted optimism, markets with fewer naive investors likeand bonds don’t seem .
... we’d expect Trump’s tariffs after last weekend’s retreat on China to cut overall U.S. trade by roughly 50 percent.
Does cutting U.S. trade with the world in general by half and reducing trade with China by two thirds sound to you like Trump calling off his trade war? It sounds to me like a massive disruption of the world economy, only slightly less disruptive than what we were looking at last week.
What about the impact on U.S. families? Tariffs are sales taxes levied on American households; don’t let anyone tell you different. Walmart yesterday that it will have to begin raising prices later this month because of the tariffs.
And tariffs are regressive sales taxes that fall much more heavily on lower-income Americans than on the affluent, for three reasons. First, low-income households spend a higher fraction of their income. Second, compared with the affluent, poor and working-class families spend more on goods, which are facing tariffs, as opposed to services, which aren’t. Finally, the goods whose prices will rise most tend to be items like clothing that loom large in lower-income families’ budgets.
... We may not be looking at the complete economic meltdown that seemed quite possible (and is still a possibility), but we’re still looking at much higher inflation and an economic slowdown at best — i.e., stagflation. ... so many pundits and reporters ... have been sounding the all clear on Trump’s tariffs, when the reality is that all we’ve seen is a modest retreat from complete, destructive insanity to seriously harmful madness. It’s hard to avoid the sense that what we’re seeing on tariffs is another version of the sanewashing that Trump has benefited from ever since he entered politics. People just keep wanting to believe that he’s making sense, that he isn’t as ignorant and irresponsible as he seems. But he is.
25May2025
, Robert Reich video
He's not ushering in a New Golden Age. He's taking us back to the Gilded Age.
, Paul Krugman
The House has now passed what must surely be the worst piece of legislation in modern U.S. history. Millions of Americans are about to see crucial government support snatched away. A significant number will die prematurely due to lack of adequate medical care or nutrition. Yet all this suffering won’t come close to offsetting the giant hole in the budget created by huge tax cuts for the rich. Long-term interest rates have already soared as America loses the last vestiges of its former reputation for fiscal responsibility.
First, get Americans — mainly wealthy Americans — to pay the taxes they owe. ...
Second, crack down on Medicare Advantage overpayments. ...Medicare is at risk of overpaying [Medicare Advantage] plans between $1.3 trillion and $2 trillion over the next decade
Third, go after corporate tax avoidance. Much of this involves multinational firms using strategies that are shady and dishonest but legal to make profits actually earned in the United States disappear and reappear in low-tax nations like Ireland.
Finally, we should just get rid of Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cut.
... politicians who aren’t even willing to do these things have no business lecturing anyone about fiscal responsibility.
Corporate Political Responsibility, Erb Institute, U Michigan
“The transition of CPRT into Third Side Strategies is a powerful example of the Erb Institute’s mission in action ...We’re proud to have incubated this groundbreaking work at the intersection of business, sustainability, and democracy—and we’re thrilled to see it evolve into an independent force for principled leadership.”
CPRT was born out of a simple but profound insight: sustainability innovators are often placed at a competitive disadvantage when the rules of the market don’t support long-term thinking. If companies want to lead on sustainability, their public affairs strategies must align with their values—not undermine them. This vision was articulated in an award-winning article, “” by Erb Professor Tom Lyon and co-authors that coined the term corporate political responsibility. ... .
1June2025
, Paul Krugman
Donald Trump and his family have made billions off the $Trump and $Melania “meme coins,” but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that other politicians have also been the beneficiaries of crypto largesse. ... And what the crypto industry wants out of today’s politicians, above all, is legislation that gives a veneer of legitimacy to stablecoins like Tether.
What is a stablecoin? It’s a digital token like Bitcoin — that is, an asset that “belongs” to whoever has the secret numerical key that unlocks it. But unlike Bitcoin, whose value in dollars fluctuates wildly day to day, a stablecoin is supposed to retain a fixed value in dollars. The stablecoin issuer maintains that stability by standing ready to buy its tokens back, holding reserves of conventional assets like Treasury bills for that purpose. ... the ownership and disposition of stablecoins, unlike the ownership and distribution of bank deposits, is anonymous. This is a highly valuable feature for those who want to engage in money laundering, extortion, purchase of illegal drugs, and so on. In other words, the only economic reason for stablecoins is to facilitate criminal activity. ... the biggest stablecoin issuers are trying to reassure holders of their solvency by accumulating large reserves of U.S. government debt. But the flip side of this is that a run on stablecoins could turn into a ! That is, if the owners of stablecoins were to rush to convert their holdings into dollars, this would force stablecoin issuers into a fire sale of U.S. Treasury bills, driving up interest rates.
The fundamental point is that the growth and legitimation of stablecoins poses new risks to — all in the name of making it easier for criminals to do their business.
8June2025
Judd Legum, Popular Info
The Senate is considering the GENIUS Act, which would provide an official regulatory framework for stablecoins. The passage of the GENIUS Act would legitimize and mainstream stablecoins. According to one industry analyst, if the GENIUS Act passes, the stablecoin industry could rise from . ... Why are [some] Senate Democrats providing Trump an opportunity to make his corrupt crypto scheme even more profitable?
, Robert Reich
We’re cutting is waste, fraud and abuse
Rubbish. Here’s the truth: The bill passed by the House will reduce federal spending on Medicaid by at least $600 billion over a decade and reduce enrollment by about 10.3 million people
You got more than 1.4 million illegal aliens on Medicaid.
Utter BS. Here’s the truth: Unauthorized immigrants are not eligible for federally funded Medicaid, except in emergency situations. States are required to to determine eligibility.
“The One Big, Beautiful Bill ... the largest deficit reduction in nearly 30 years with $1.6 trillion in mandatory savings.” (Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary)
Baloney. Here’s the truth: The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill will increase the deficit by
15June2025
, Ro Khana (D-CA)
Congressman on Tuesday unveiled a progressive plan to cut the deficit by $12 trillion and enable investment in "essential programs for ordinary Americans: childcare, universal healthcare, affordable housing, free college, cancellation, advanced manufacturing, and good-paying jobs."
The California Democrat's , introduced in a report and floor , has five recommendations to cut spending: modernize the military ($850 billion), get rid of upcoding and fraud in ($830 billion), negotiate Medicare drug prices ($200 billion), end fossil fuel subsidies ($170 billion), and implement smarter procurement and contracting ($333 billion)....
The plan doesn't just advocate for spending cuts, it also features a trio of recommendations for generating revenue: tax corporations fairly ($2 trillion), tax billionaires ($4.7 trillion), and protect Social Security ($2.9 trillion).
, Notes on the Crises Substack
The first public signal of chaos at the IRS ... when the that DOGE was seeking access to the IRS’s Integrated Data Retrieval System—one of the most sensitive ... databases of personal information in the federal government. ...Since then, the chaos has only multiplied to include , , and a DOGE-hosted IRS “.” These aren’t isolated incidents. They reflect a strategic campaign to transform the IRS into a politically partisan enforcement mechanism and a lever of executive power.
The IRS sits at the center of the federal government’s fiscal architecture. As the financial nexus between the state and its residents, it facilitates the movement of trillions of dollars through the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. It enforces tax law, detects fraud, and has the authority to audit the ultra-wealthy to crack down on tax evasion that enables them to become even richer. ... taxes facilitate the provision of public goods and services: everything from national defense and infrastructure to schools and our social safety nets. Taxes come in many forms, including income taxes (on wages, salaries, and capital gains), consumption taxes (such as sales and excise taxes), property taxes, and corporate taxes ... What’s also being lost in all of this is not just IRS institutional expertise or workforce capacity. It’s the legitimacy of the social contract: the idea that taxation is a collective democratic function. DOGE’s approach echoes a system where data is extracted not to serve the public, but to entrench private and executive power. In this framework, the IRS no longer upholds civic duty, but instead enforces obedience. Public authority remains, but democratic accountability disappears.
We are no longer just watching a system decay. We are watching it be consolidated to serve private power, silence dissent, and reverse the very idea of democratic taxation. It’s a constitutional breakdown. If the IRS falls, we won’t just lose an agency; we’ll lose one of the last institutional expressions of democratic obligation. Taxation is not just how we keep a number of key infrastructures running—it is how we declare what we value, who we protect, and who must answer to the public. The IRS reflects that social contract, however imperfectly, and not without deep bias. But unlike some other federal institutions, its mandate remains tenuously anchored in public law and congressional oversight. It is one of the few places where the struggle over fiscal accountability is still active and, for now, structurally possible.
22June2025
, NYTimes
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, in congressional testimony last month, foresaw a situation where stablecoin issuers held $2 trillion or more of Treasury securities. If panicked customers force them to sell these securities, Treasury prices could collapse, sharply increasing interest rates and destabilizing other financial markets and our entire economy.
Those are the risks we are taking on by catering to crypto enthusiasts, as well as the crypto firms, tech companies and banks who would in all likelihood profit substantially from issuing stablecoins with the government’s imprimatur.
The arrow of history points away from the private provision of multiple kinds of money. Virtually all economies, and not just that of the United States, have moved to create a more uniform, reliable payment system suitable for a deeply interconnected economy. Fracturing the payment system would only undermine that economy.
, Jigar Shah, NYTimes
The infrastructure investments of the past four years represent the most significant progress since the Eisenhower era. But they are neither guaranteed nor permanent. If Congress and the Trump administration don’t act now, we won’t just cede economic advantage. We’ll see energy costs spike, more frequent power outages and investors pushing their companies to scale up in Asia. America will be left with 20th-century tools in a 21st-century world and will once again be left buying back its own inventions.
, Krugman
Share of the top 0.01% in total wealth, from the GC Wealth Project
29June2025
Episode 1: … the United States is operating exactly in the way of an arbitrary despotism that is to say the king says and inevitably the king says this domestically and internationally … it made it impossible for anyone to plan
Episode 2: ... how did we get here ...
Episode 3: ... the great uncertainty of the world economy ..
, ProPublica (2021 article but valuable)
ProPublica has obtained a vast trove of Internal Revenue Service data on the tax returns of thousands of the nation’s wealthiest people, covering more than 15 years. ... The IRS records show that the wealthiest can — perfectly legally — pay income taxes that are only a tiny fraction of the hundreds of millions, if not billions, their fortunes grow each year. ... We compared how much in taxes the 25 richest Americans paid each year to how much estimated their wealth grew in that same time period. ... those 25 people saw their worth rise a collective $401 billion from 2014 to 2018. They paid a total of $13.6 billion in federal income taxes in those five years, ... That’s a staggering sum, but it amounts to a true tax rate of only 3.4%.
6July2025
, Paul Krugman
The U.S. government doesn’t do enough to mitigate income and wealth inequality. ... the top tax rate should be higher, probably between 70 and 80 percent. ... the rich pay too little in taxes. What about the amount of aid we provide to lower-income families? ... Aid to low-income families, especially families with children, has , because children who have had adequate health care and nutrition are much more productive as adults than children who haven’t. Yet the just passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act imposes savage cuts on Medicaid, so as to free up money for large tax cuts for the rich. ... Clearly, a relative handful of wealthy Americans, constituting a tiny fraction of the electorate, have a great deal of political power. Where does that come from? ... politicians have a strong incentive to be deferential toward likely sources of campaign funds — above all, wealthy individuals and big business. .... Money, then, talks very loudly through campaign finance. But that’s only one channel of its influence, .... Heritage is just one of multiple institutions devoted to promoting a view of the world favorable to the interests of the very wealthy. These include an almost dizzying array of think tanks, with Heritage just the biggest. They also include media organizations like the Wall Street Journal’s opinion section ... These .01%-friendly institutions shape public discourse ... But the revolving door, in which officials who pursued policies friendly to corporations and the wealthy land lucrative positions as lobbyists, consultants and members of corporate boards when they leave office, is very real. ... in addition to buying political support through campaign contributions and supporting institutions that promote right-wing ideology, great wealth distorts policy in other ways, ranging from the crude reality of the revolving door to subtler mechanisms. .... What can be done? ... First, we could restore effective regulation of campaign finance. ... Second, we could strengthen countervailing institutions. In particular, unions ... Reforms that limit the power of wealth could turn this into a virtuous circle in which reduced inequality reduces the bias of policy toward the interests of the 0.01%.
13July2025
, Nonprofit Quarterly
1. Rebuilding a Sense of Citizenship
Given growing misinformation and disinformation…mandatory civics and media literacy classes throughout the middle and high school years are needed.
Many countries have mandatory military service, and some of these include a service component. What I am proposing would focus on the service end, while making space for young people to choose enlisting in the military to satisfy the requirement. This effort could be modeled on the existing program, which incidentally across the United States. Young people’s work could also be directed to our national and state parks, similar to Roosevelt’s .
There are many models, including existing Peace Corps and AmeriCorps programs in the United States. Some have existed for a long time. Mexico’s program is called ; it was established in 1936 to engage university students in reconstructing the country after the Mexican Revolution. Other countries with civilian service programs Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, and Chile.
2. Supporting Children
3. Building a Stronger Safety Net
The United States has suffered gravely from growing income and wealth inequality, but that means more can be collected from the beneficiaries.
4. Environment: Far more could be said here about the need to address the climate crisis, but I will be brief. A released in 2024 from the office of Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and Representative Ocasio-Cortez outlines how existing legislation passed during the Biden administration, notably the and the , could, if leveraged appropriately—advance many national climate justice goals.
How to Pay for What We Need
Where can the money come from to implement these initiatives? It is no great mystery that the United States has suffered gravely from, but that means more can be collected from the beneficiaries of this inequality. Here are three such measures.
Moving Forward
What’s listed above is not comprehensive, but it’s a start. I hope it might spur further discussion.
27July2025
These are import taxes, and we’re on almost everything we buy – to. ... . A new study from the Yale Budget Lab .
website
Everyday costs are climbing, and working families are feeling the squeeze. But why? The answer lies in government policies that leave working families behind— tariffs that drive prices up and tax breaks that benefit the rich and big corporations instead of everyday Americans.
, Heatmap
For companies exposed to the AI boom, business has been good — excellent, even. The surge in ongoing capital investment into data centers and electricity than other recent booms .... Outside of the AI economy, though, the economy has been a fair bit colder. You might even say it’s been frozen by indecision. When you talk to business leaders, they confess confusion about where things are heading. President Trump’s constantly changing tariffs — and his administration’s — have made it difficult for non-AI-exposed businesses to plan long-term capital investment.
3August2025
, News From The Underground Substack
Millennials and Gen Z did everything right. We stayed out of trouble. We worked hard. We got the degrees. We became the most educated generations in American history — and we were told that if we did these things, we’d have a shot at the American dream. Instead, we inherited a broken economy rigged against us from the start. ... We got record debt, exploding rent, impossible housing markets, unaffordable childcare, collapsing healthcare, and wages that haven’t kept up with inflation ... We can elect leaders who actually fight for working people. We can demand a government that treats housing, healthcare, childcare, and education as rights — not luxuries. We can reform taxes, raise wages, and make sure no one’s future is held hostage by a select few corporations ...
, Economic Policy Institute
Longstanding U.S. worker rights and protections are under acute threat. These include attempts to roll back standards that set a national floor for minimum wages, health and safety, nondiscrimination, unemployment insurance, and other rights and protections long taken for granted in most U.S. workplaces. ... Cuts to federal agency funding and mass firings of federal civil servants—e.g. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the CDC’s National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, the National Labor Relations Board, and U.S. Department of Labor units like the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Wage and Hour Division ... imperiled the federal government’s capacity to ensure U.S. workers get paid what they’re owed, stay safe at work, have the freedom to form a union, and work in environments free from discrimination. ... executive actions have directly targeted rights of workers for elimination. Examples include decisions to of federal contractors; strip of federal employees; for hundreds of thousands of migrant workers; and new standards to safeguard workers’ overtime wages, freedom to change jobs, and right to organize. Most recently, the administration has taken initial steps to roll back scores of wage and hour and health and safety standards via . ... Trump’s escalating and often lawless ... The crisis calls for urgent action. At a minimum, states must be equipped to maintain and enforce basic protections should at-risk federal standards disappear. ...
Social Security / Medicaid / SNAP / Reproductive Rights
18May2025
, Faith Action Network
Congress considers devastating cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as part of a major budget reconciliation bill this spring ... we believe that we have more than enough resources to provide food and healthcare for all people and that we are called to hold our leaders accountable for the common good. We need to keep up the pressure in these critical weeks, and FAN is sharing a range of resources for you to learn about the issues, advocate for a moral budget, and invite others to join you:
, Kathleen Weber
... most legislation is passed by the reconciliation process where only a simple majority is needed to pass a financial package. Because of this, a long list of radical changes are crammed into what Trump calls his “big beautiful bill.”
Extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts: ... a nonpartisan ... people making less than $50,000 per year would get $263 in tax relief while those making over $1 million would get more than $81,000.
Cuts to Medicaid: From now on, Medicaid recipients must qualify twice a year. Those who are childless must prove that they are engaged in 80 hours per month of work, volunteer service, or education. ... These changes put a bigger administrative cost and burden on states who do the work of qualifying applicants. ... cuts to Medicaid will come into effect in 2029, so Republicans will not have to face voters with these cuts in place.
Cuts to Nursing Homes: Nursing homes in 49 states have been using ... the provider tax to increase funding for Medicaid patients. If that loophole is closed, nursing homes will have to reduce the number of Medicaid patients they care for. Thus, the bill doesn’t take Medicaid benefits away from a patient directly but makes openings in nursing homes less available.
Eliminations of subsidies for Obamacare: an estimated 2 million will lose coverage
Lowering the federal contribution for food stamps
Repeal Biden's student loan forgiveness programs
Repeal all Biden credits incentivizing green energy (wind, solar, nuclear, EVs)
Raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. The Treasury Department will run out of money ... in August.
Over the weekend, Speaker Mike Johnson will be negotiating with the various factions among the House Republicans. Here are a few of the most prominent groups: The Budget Hawks (Freedom Caucus) want $2 trillion in cuts to federal spending as opposed to $1.5 trillion dollars. The , a group of Republicans representing Blue States want a higher deduction for SALT (state and local income taxes). About 10 congressional Republicans want no cuts to Medicaid
, The Lancet
The United States Congress has proposed cuts to Medicaid, reversing the Affordable Care Act expansion.These cuts could increase mortality and financial hardship for enrollees while straining health-care providers, especially in rural and underserved areas. ... Approximately 72 million individuals in the USA are enrolled in Medicaid nationwide.... an estimated 15·5 million people would lose Medicaid coverage ... the proposed cuts, potential excess deaths could reach approximately 14 660 over a 1-year period for people aged 25–64 years, the equivalent of the seventh leading cause of death in that age group ... rural residents with low income, might be disproportionately affected. ... Loss of Medicaid coverage will increase financial hardship. ... we estimate that approximately 623 000 additional individuals aged 25–64 years ... will face catastrophic health-care costs annually. ... the planned cuts could lead up to 8·7 million American people to forego needed medical care, exacerbating chronic conditions and worsening long-term health outcomes not captured in our immediate mortality calculations. Medicaid also plays a critical role in child health, and loss of coverage during childhood could have lifelong effects on health and economic productivity. Finally, many hospitals in rural areas depend on Medicaid payments to stay open, and their closure would adversely affect the entire populations they serve, regardless of Medicaid coverage. ... These findings underscore the critical role of Medicaid in protecting public health and economic stability. Policy makers should carefully weigh the health and financial consequences of these cuts for their constituents.
, WA Post
... the major changes DOGE pushed at Social Security have been abandoned or are being reversed after proving ineffective, while others are and satisfaction. The problems come as the agency struggles to cope with a record surge of hundreds of thousands of retirement claims in recent months.
, Indivisible
Republicans in Congress are on a mission to strip working families of $1.5 trillion in Medicaid, SNAP, and other essential programs—all to pay for more than $4.5 trillion in tax breaks for the super-rich.
Paul Krugman
Republicans in Congress, taking their marching orders from Donald Trump, are on track to enact a hugely regressive budget — big tax giveaways to the wealthy combined with cruel cuts in programs that serve lower-income Americans. True, the legislation suffered a setback last week, initially failing to make it out of committee. But that was largely because some right-wing Republicans didn’t think the benefit cuts were vicious enough.
Medicaid, in case anyone needs reminding, is the national health insurance program for low-income Americans who probably don’t have any other way to pay for medical care. In 2023 Medicaid covered , far more than Medicare (which covers seniors), including 39 percent of children.
Providing health care to children, by the way, isn’t just about social justice and basic decency. It’s also good economics: Children who receive adequate care grow up to be more productive adults. Among other things they end up paying more taxes, so Medicaid for children almost surely pays for itself.
The belief that many Americans receiving government support are malingering, that they could and should be working but are choosing to be lazy, is a classic zombie idea. That is, like the claim that cutting taxes on the rich will unleash an economic miracle, it’s a doctrine that should be long dead. It has, after all, been proved wrong by experience again and again.
But right-wingers simply refuse to accept the reality that almost everyone on Medicaid is either a child, a senior, disabled or between jobs. Only 3 percent of Medicaid recipients were non-disabled working-age adults persistently not working — the kind of people right-wingers imagine infest the program. And it’s a good bet that a fair number of these people had extenuating circumstances of some kind.
25May2025
,
, and . ..., and now Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. . (As explained and the must-read , about what it treats as “a serious or life-threatening adverse event,” and .)
Let’s reach out to our members of Congress and remind them and ask them to support measures like Senator Tina Smith’s to
8June2025
Lives, Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove
The damage from the House bill’s cruel and logic-free cuts to Medicaid and other health services will fall mostly heavily on the 15 million who will lose health insurance. But the damage won’t be contained there—nearly everybody else in the U.S. will feel the harms of less efficient health care and labor markets, higher needs to pay for uncompensated care, closures and cutbacks in health care providers and hospitals, and even damage to entire local economies that are reliant on this health spending. For the very rich who will see enormous tax cuts from this bill, it all might end up being a good deal. For everybody else, it will not.
29June2025
, Robert Hubbell Substack
On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that Planned Parenthood clinics in South Carolina could not bring a claim under Section 1983 to challenge a state law that prohibited any Medicaid funds from being spent at a clinic that provides abortions, even though the Medicaid funds were not being spent on abortions. ... The decision is virulently anti-woman, anti-reproductive freedom, anti-Medicaid, and anti-civil rights. ... In short, the Supreme Court has announced a special presumption against the ability of individuals to enforce their civil rights to sue for violation of federal law—effectively green-lighting the rights of states to deny Medicaid benefits with impunity. ... the Supreme Court just made it significantly more difficult for women, especially poor women, to obtain contraception, treatment for sexually transmitted diseases, cancer screening, Pap smears, breast exams, and other preventive services. ...
, DemLabs
“I primarily went to Washington because I don’t like what’s going on at the Department of Veterans Affairs. Those people working there are scared to death they’re going to get the chopping block, and that’s where I get all my health care,” said John Spitzberg, a former major who served in the military from 1958 to 1972.
Morale among doctors and nurses at Veterans Affairs hospitals has plunged ... They are worried about support staff being laid off after President Donald Trump took office in January despite an already strained medical system with staffing shortages, hiring freezes and attrition. And they are worried about the VA’s goal — on hold for now — to reduce its 470,000-person workforce by some 15%. ... They say supplies have gone unordered, appointments go unscheduled, and medical staff fear that these conditions might not only encourage doctors and nurses now working in the over-strained system to quit, but dry up the pipeline for future talent to care for the country’s veterans. ... Almost no federal agency has been spared from the slashes, but with a target
laying off some 70,000 people, the VA cuts would be . ... This comes as VA hospitals were already facing critical shortages, with ... a doctor at another VA hospital said physicians and nurses there are now servicing medical equipment and making patient appointments. “This is like a death by a thousand cuts,” that doctor said. “They’re trying to make life difficult. They’re trying to make people quit.” ... doctors who spoke to CNN agreed that they are concerned that patient care will worsen. “I’m going to fail,” one doctor said, “because I can’t do budgeting, hiring actions, scheduling actions” on top of treating patients.[This article echoes what I heard recently from a former physician colleague, who still works at the VA]
10August2025
, NPR
Trump is withholding Title X funds from reproductive health providers, cutting off free contraception for hundreds of thousands of low-income patients. Lawsuits say clinics were targeted over DEI statements, while Medicaid cuts and other policies threaten to shutter Planned Parenthood locations nationwide. This is a coordinated rollback of reproductive rights, starting with the poor and marginalized. This is part of a broader attack on women’s rights—and these limits will spread.
Science / Education / Libraries / Art
18May2025
Science Magazine, in its , has several articles about the impact of the first 100 days of Trump's war on the scientific enterprise. Here is an excerpt from an overview article "":
It is almost certainly the most consequential 100 days that scientists in the United States have experienced since the end of World War II. Since taking his oath of office on 20 January, President Donald Trump has unleashed an unprecedented rapid-fire campaign to remake—some would say demolish—vast swaths of the federal government’s scientific and public health infrastructure. His administration has erased entire agencies that fund research; fired or pushed out thousands of federal workers with technical backgrounds; terminated research and training grants and contracts worth billions of dollars; and banned new government funding for activities it finds offensive, from efforts to diversify the scientific workforce to studies of the health needs of LGBTQ people. ...
NSF investments have made America and American science great. At least 268 received NSF grants during their careers. The foundation has partnered with agencies across the government since it was created, including those dealing with and . The Federal Reserve estimates that government-supported research from the NSF and other agencies has had a return on investment of since 1950, meaning for every dollar U.S. taxpayers invested, they got back between $1.50 and $3.
Since January, , and a have threatened the integrity and mission of the National Science Foundation. Hundreds of . The administration’s proposed would cut NSF’s funding by 55%, an unprecedented reduction that would end federal support for science research .
, The Lancet
President Donald Trump has promised a new golden age of scientific progress and innovation. ... Yet Trump, ... has launched a series of extraordinary attacks on universities that threaten to impose political obedience and crush academia.
Executive Orders obsessing over diversity and gender empowered Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency to slash federal budgets and awards, interrupting investigations into paediatric cancer, diabetes, and HIV, prematurely ending at least 113 clinical trials, and witholding funds from more than 200 universities. PhD projects have been cancelled, graduate admissions rescinded, and infrastructure investment forgone. The visas of foreign-born American students and faculty have been revoked and high-profile detentions and deportations are already reversing decades of brain gain that have drawn generations of global talent to US institutions.
The harm wrought from these deprivations will be lasting and expansive. Universities are the incubators of crucial basic research that advances health and science—biomedical advances such as magnetic resonance imaging, the Human Genome Project, CRISPR, and cancer checkpoint inhibitors all began in university laboratories. The work done at universities is a key driver of US economic success. But universities also have less immediately tangible value. They should be a place for the cultivation of free expression, curiosity, exploration, and debate, where intellectual and artistic thought can develop, and where the next generation of innovators and leaders can learn, grow, and thrive.
“The history of medical science teaches clearly the supreme importance of affording the prepared mind complete freedom for the exercise of initiative. It is the special province of the medical schools and universities to foster medical research in this way.” [Vannevar Bush] These words stand in stark contrast to the actions of Trump and his administration, whose campaign of ideological persecution of universities threatens to irrevocably sever that uniquely successful partnership and with it dismantle one of the essential pillars of American civil society.
25May2025
, If You Can Keep It Substack
Tomorrow, my colleague and our co-counsel will argue a motion for a preliminary injunction in our lawsuit against the Trump administration for illegally cancelling hundreds of National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grants on topics and communities that the White House dislikes. ....
We argue that it’s illegal and unconstitutional for the administration to arbitrarily cancel research funding like this. ...
Science is not just an academic pursuit. From medicine to public health to engineering to technology to public policy, scientific discoveries and innovations quite literally shape the world around us.
Science saves lives.
The politicization of NIH funding is not only illegal — it’s a threat to real research and real people, and not just the already-vulnerable communities that the administration has repeatedly scapegoated. The directives that triggered these cuts (and the cuts themselves) must be reversed.
, The Hill
The pause of billions of dollars in research funding to universities has had devastating effects on cancer research as lab work is put on hold and schools are halting the acceptance of new Ph.D. students.
The Trump administration’s war with higher education, combined with efforts to reduce government spending by the Department of Government Efficiency, has left significant casualties in cancer research, which in the U.S. is largely done at colleges and universities. ...
“I see a large number of people who should be at the great universities over the next 10-15 years trying to figure out how to bail out right now, and I’m afraid we’re going to lose a generation of America’s best researchers, and that’s going to be a huge setback for us,” said Otis Brawley, an expert in cancer prevention and control at Johns Hopkins University.
... An analysis in JAMA on earlier this month found the NIH alone cut almost $1.5 billion in funding in less than 40 days.
Along with a decrease in grants, the NIH is also losing thousands of staffers in a reduction of its workforce.
“We’ve seen institutions like Johns Hopkins and the University of California system already starting to make some cuts to their overall staff,” ...
A minority staff report from the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee this month said the Trump administration cut $2.7 billion in funding to NIH since January and warned the actions “will lead to fewer breakthroughs for diseases like cancer, a weaker public health response against future infectious disease threats, and a continued decline in trust in public institutions.”
The situation with research funding is likely to only get worse, however, as universities plan out their budget for the next academic and fiscal years. Schools are going to struggle with predicting what type of funding cuts could hit them as the Trump administration has made clear it is not done going after universities.
“What we’ve seen with the Trump administration is they’ve completely slowed down the peer review process, where they are not funding things at the same level or amount that they were previously. They’re also terminating a lot of grants,” Spreitzer said....
“We know that research staff around the country have lost their jobs because when the grant ends, is terminated, there is no funding for that project. And universities are trying to understand the magnitude of this issue, the duration of the issue. … But this unexpected change makes it difficult to do robust planning,” Fuentes-Afflick added.
The Trump administration has been cancelling grants at Harvard University over the past several weeks, citing the University’s alleged failure to address campus antisemitism. While all of Harvard has been affected, Harvard Chan School stands to lose the most from the cuts, because it relies on funding from the federal government and other outside sponsors for 59% of its budget—a higher percentage than other Harvard schools.
Other schools of public health have also had grant funding terminated, the article noted, but Harvard Chan School has been hit hardest.
, professor of environmental epidemiology, talked about receiving an email about the cancellation. “It feels like a gut punch,” he said. He noted that the funding cancellation could mean the end of his research, conducted over the past 20 years, to learn why military veterans are more likely to be diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) than other groups. He said he is worried about the jobs and futures of the 10 to 15 researchers who work with him.
1June2025
, Katherine Stewart, New Republic
The proposed 2026 calls for a devastating 37 percent cut in funding for biomedical research through the National Institutes of Health; a 56 percent cut in science research funding through the National Science Foundation; and further, major cuts in science budgets at NASA, NOAA, the EPA, the CDC, the Agriculture Department, the Energy Department, the U.S. Geological Survey, the Forest Service, and other smaller agencies. Make no mistake: This is a total war on science in America. If an enemy power wished to demolish one of the pillars of American economic, military, and political strength over the past century, this might be what they would do.
This anti-rationalist ideology comes in several flavors, not all of them consistent. One wing comes out of the evangelical hard right, which has long argued that science has been turned into a weapon against faith. ... Then there is a different approach emerging from people in the orbit of far-right think tanks such as the . They hold the view that science has become part of a “woke bureaucracy” ... A third, much smaller but highly influential group includes the slice of tech bros who have allied with the authoritarian movement. Some believe that AI and other allegedly private-sector forces will soon dominate science; therefore, we don’t need the traditional government funding system. They want us instead to put our blind faith behind them, the wizard-founders, who they insist are the absolute best at everything they do and can be therefore counted on to pursue science on behalf of all humanity ...
Scientists will need to step forward and help the public understand the value of their work. Historians need to step forward and explain the extraordinary achievements of the American research university system. The rest of us need to get the message out. The true consequences of this equation will show up 10 and 20 years from now, when our once-great democracy faces health, climate, and other crises that might well have been avoided.
8June2025
A new executive order allows Trump-appointed officials to “correct” and censor federal scientific findings, claiming to restore scientific rigor while sidelining expert review.
Over 6,000 scientists, academics, and physicians signed a protest letter warning that the order seeks control and undermines independence and trust in research institutions.
The order threatens research on climate change, DEI-informed science, and worst-case scenario modeling — while invoking language from the open science movement to justify political oversight.
In the wake of the Trump administration’s sweeping terminations of federally funded grants at Harvard University, researchers at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health are lamenting the loss of lifesaving research across multiple disciplines.
, Robert Reich
Throughout history, tyrants have understood that their major enemy is an educated public. Slaveholders prohibited enslaved people from learning to read. The Third Reich burned books. The Khmer Rouge banned music. Stalin and Pinochet censored the media. ... He has embraced one of the mottos from George Orwell’s 1984: ” He knows that an uninformed public is easier to divide and conquer.
Re-Write History
Trump and his MAGA cronies are making schools , cover up the and erase the .
Gut Education
As Trump tries to abolish the Department of Education, he’s also proposing to cut funding for K-12 public schools and to force universities to let him influence .
Dismantle Science
By and attacking the , the , and , Trump is stifling medical and scientific research. And his cuts to the and put all of us at risk.
Suppress The Media
From suing
and
over their news coverage to to , Trump is trying to silence America’s sources of news.Attack The Arts
So it’s no surprise that Trump is , is what’s displayed at the Smithsonian, and has for the Performing Arts. To limit art is to limit free speech and expression. It’s a crucial step that authoritarians use to silence anyone who dissents through creativity.
15June2025
, Annie Waldman et al.
The National Institutes of Health is responsible for . Its funding has sparked countless medical breakthroughs — on cancer, diabetes, strokes — and plays a fundamental role in the .
Scientists compete vigorously for a slice of the more than $30 billion that the agency doles out annually; they can spend years assembling grant applications that stretch thousands of pages in hopes of convincing peer reviewers of the promise of their projects. Only .
The mass cancellation of grants in response to political policy shifts has no precedent... It threatens the stability of the institution and the scientific enterprise of the nation at large.
22June2025
, Seattle Times
In 13 years at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Fiona Havers crafted guidance for contending with Zika virus, helped China respond to outbreaks of bird flu and guided safe burial practices for Ebola deaths in Liberia. More recently, she was a senior adviser on vaccine policy, leading a team that produced data on hospitalizations related to COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus. To the select group of scientists, federal officials and advocates who study who should get immunizations and when, Havers is well known, an embodiment of the CDC’s intensive data-gathering operations. On Monday, Havers resigned, saying she could no longer continue while Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismantled the careful processes that help formulate vaccination standards in the United States.
“If it isn’t stopped, and some of this isn’t reversed, like, immediately, a lot of Americans are going to die as a result of vaccine-preventable diseases,” she said ...
, Wa Post
The small federal agency tasked with easing the nation’s profound struggles with mental illness and drug addiction is in crisis itself: Hundreds of employees have left its staff of about 900, and its budget would be slashed as part of President Donald Trump’s proposed overhaul of the nation’s health apparatus.
The reshaping of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, or SAMHSA, is already hampering public health efforts in communities big and small.
Despite in overdose deaths, estimates of the number of people killed by drugs in the United States still exceeded a staggering 80,000 in 2024. And nearly a quarter of all U.S. adults have recently experienced mental illness, with the largest percentage among young adults,
s, Wa Post
The Government Accountability Office said the administration violated a law blocking presidents from withholding congressionally appropriated funds when the Institute of Museum and Library Services did not distribute money it had received. ... The Institute of Museum and Library Services, an independent government agency created in 1996 by an act of Congress, submitted a budget request of $280 million for fiscal 2025. New York, one of the states that opposed the executive order, received $8 million through the institute last year to fund literacy programs for children and adults, improve internet access in libraries, and train library employees and pay for the salaries of two-thirds of state library staff, according to the state.
, Undark
University officials were concerned about new language in NIH grant notices. That language said that universities will be subject to liability under a Civil War-era statute called the False Claims Act if they fail to abide by civil rights laws and a Jan. 20 related to gender. ... The new terms may expose universities to significant legal risk, according to several experts. “The Trump administration is using the False Claims Act as a massive threat to the bottom lines of research institutions,” said Samuel Bagenstos, a law professor at the University of Michigan, ... That law entitles the government to collect up to the financial damage. “So potentially you could imagine the Trump administration seeking all the federal funds times three that an institution has received if they find a violation of the False Claims Act.”
, If You Can Keep It Substack
The court ruled that NIH’s actions targeting research involving disfavored topics and populations were unlawful and lacked any clear guidance or scientific justification. This decision halts NIH’s unprecedented attempt to shut down critical biomedical research, and the ruling safeguards studies vital to diagnosing, preventing, and treating life-threatening diseases. Importantly, the court also sought to prevent the NIH from politicizing research going forward. The ruling ensures that NIH follows its own procedures and evaluates proposals based on merit, not political pressure. ... This is far from the end of the effort to protect science, knowledge, and discovery from politicization by an autocratic agenda — the judge made clear that he was, for now, limiting his ruling to only the specific grants and applications listed by our clients. But it’s a mighty strong start.
29June2025
, Dr. Katharine Hayhoe Newsletter
Much of the science that shows us what’s happening to our planet, and the choices we must make to ensure our future, is currently under threat in the United States. , , , and threaten our ability to monitor current changes and prepare for what’s coming: and that’s very unfortunate news, because the planet won’t stop warming just because we stop paying attention. ... It looks all but certain that the 1.5°C target is out of reach, and meeting the 2°C target set by the Paris Agreement will be extremely challenging. As the science says, “every bit of warming matters;” the more the planet warms, the worse the impacts. But without scientific leadership, we’ll be facing the future alone and unaware. That’s a scary thought.
Aix-Marseille University welcomed the first ... U.S. academics fleeing Trump’s cuts to research and education. Its new “Safe Place for Science” program offers sanctuary to researchers fearing political interference, defunding, or persecution. Nearly 300 scientists from elite U.S. institutions applied, with many citing attacks on climate science, democracy research, and academic freedom. ... Trump’s war on education is hollowing out America’s research capacity, while foreign governments step in to offer a safe harbor
Environmental Protection Agency employees ... published a from the agency’s policies under the Trump administration, saying they “undermine the EPA mission of protecting human health and the environment.” ... The letter outlines what the EPA employees see as five main concerns: undermining public trust; ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters; reversing EPA’s progress in America’s most vulnerable communities; dismantling the Office of Research and Development; and promoting a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their livelihood and well-being. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health , publishing their own letter of dissent.
6July2025
, The Guardian
In normal times, much of the NSF budget ($9bn in 2024-25) is allocated to research institutions after projects undergo a rigorous three-step review process – beginning with the program officer, an expert in the field, who ensures the proposed study fits in with the agency’s priorities. The program officer convenes an expert panel to evaluate the proposal on two statutory criteria – intellectual merit and broader impacts on the nation and people – which under the NSF’s legal mandate includes broadening participation of individuals, institutions, and geographic regions in Stem (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields. ... “We are under pressure to only fund proposals that fit the new narrow priorities even if they did not review as well as others,” said one current program officer. “The NSF’s gold standard review process has 100% been compromised.” Research aimed at addressing the unequal impact of the climate crisis and other environmental hazards is particularly vulnerable, according to several sources. New proposals are also being screened for any direct reference or indirect connection to diversity, equity or inclusion (DEI). “NSF is being asked to make science racist again – which contradicts evidence that shows that diversity of ideas is good for science and good for innovation. We are missing things when only white males do science,” said one program officer. In addition to Doge interfering in new proposals, at least 1,653 active NSF research grants authorized on their merits have so far been abruptly cancelled – abandoned midway through the project, according to Grant Watch, a non-profit tracker of federal science and health research grants canceled under Trump. [16 grants cancelled at University of Washington totally $15.5 million] ... The Federal Reserve estimates that government-supported research from the NSF and other agencies has had a return on investment of over the past 75 years, meaning US taxpayers have gotten back between $1.50 and $3 for every dollar invested. Trump’s big, beautiful bill calls for a 56% cut to the current $9bn NSF budget, as well as a 73% reduction in staff and fellowships – with graduate students among the hardest hit. ... This next generation of talent is being hit particularly hard under Trump, who is attempting to impose sweeping restrictions on visas and travel bans on scores of countries. The proposed 2026 budget includes funding for only 21,400 under- and postgraduate students nationwide – a 75% fall on this year. ... The sweeping cuts to the NSF come on top of Trump’s dismantling of other key scientific research departments within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Agriculture (USDA) and US Geological Service (USGS).
20July2025
, Your Local Epidemiologist Substack
This is the power of public research. When done well, it doesn’t just answer questions; it builds community, capacity, and long-term change for a healthier future. ... In just six months, more than 5,500 research projects have been halted. ... Thousands of communities left behind. Researchers stuck in limbo. And a generation of training lost. ... The Congressional budget has proposed an additional 40% cut to the NIH. NIH is the most in the Health and Human Services discretionary budget. To say that scientific discovery is being stripped to the bare bones is an understatement. ... . (
is an ongoing database of cuts.) ... If the NIH budget proposal moves forward, 200,000 jobs will be lost, resulting in $46 billion in economic losses. For each $1 invested in NIH, it returns $2.56 in local economies. ... NIH has long been the invisible force powering vaccines, cancer therapies, diagnostics, and public health breakthroughs. However, that very invisibility—science’s failure to communicate its impact on people’s lives in ways they can see and feel—has made it vulnerable. For decades, much of science communication has lived behind paywalls, wrapped in jargon, distant from the communities it’s meant to serve, even though their tax dollars fund it.Here are three starting points for reform: Engage the public. Streamline applications. Balance funding across disciplines. There are many , like workforce improvements and exploring new funding models. ... Your voice matters. The FY 2026 budget is still under negotiation and it’s not too late to stop these cuts. Staffers have informed me that it is particularly important to get people calling; a push from constituents before a vote can significantly influence senators’ decisions to vote yes or no. ... And remember, the community is not merely a research target but an active partner. So if you’re a scientist or researcher, share stories:
, Heather Cox Richardson Substack
Liz Essley Whyte reported yesterday in the Wall Street Journal that Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. plans to remove all sixteen members of a task force that advises the federal government on what preventative health care measures—things like cancer screenings—health insurers must cover. Whyte explains that the people currently on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force have medical expertise, are vetted to make sure they don’t have conflicts of interest, and use the latest scientific evidence to determine which interventions work.
In June, Kennedy replaced all seventeen of the members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) with seven people who share Kennedy’s distrust of vaccines. They announced that they would reexamine the CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule for children and adults.
3August2025
, Bill McKibben
The
that RFK Jr. has pulled the plug on the next generation of vaccines which may have offered our best route to dealing with cancer; the
that the federal government has pulled the funding for the scientist widely regarded as the world’s greatest mathematician; the
that we are going to literally destroy a satellite measuring carbon concentrations—it makes me nearly weep with frustration. ... each potentially would open up a thousand new lines of inquiry. And we’re going to actively discourage that exploration and understanding: this is something that’s never happened before in this country., NYTimes
Trump’s crackdown on elite universities is crippling community colleges that serve 40% of undergraduates. Federal grants for low-income aid, job training, and English classes are vanishing, diversity programs gutted, and essential supports like food assistance slashed, leaving schools scrambling to survive. Community colleges are gateways to the middle class and anchors of local economies. Trump’s policies threaten to dismantle these institutions, cutting off pathways for working-class and immigrant students and depriving industries of the skilled workforce needed to keep the U.S. economy competitive.
17August2025
, former CDC Director William Foege
... in his second term, President Trump acquired the peculiar expertise of health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He promotes raw milk, which can transmit pathogens; promotes the rotting of children’s teeth; and despite exhaustive testing that has shown , clings to that belief for reasons that defy understanding. ... Kennedy would be less hazardous if he decided to do cardiac surgery. Then he would kill people only one at a time rather than his current ability to kill by the thousands. Why is it that killing a single person is seen as murder but killing masses is excused if you are a politician?
Despite this environment, those working in public health must continue to keep the objectives of their profession in mind: prevent premature death, reduce unnecessary suffering, and improve the quality of life for everyone. ... We have always been challenged by nature with organisms, droughts, malnutrition, and climate change. We have also been challenged by human foibles with addictions to alcohol, tobacco, violence, and power discrepancies. Now we have special challenges because of those who hold power but have no concept of public health responsibilities.
But we can face these new challenges with our traditional threefold approach.
First, try to get the science right. ... Science is not the same as truth, but it is our best avenue to seek the truth.
Second, add art to create “creative common sense at its best.”
And third, it needs scientists with a moral compass. When that is done, we have the ability to strive for “moral common sense at its best.”
We will live through this drought of values, principles, and facts and again apply our talents to improving global health and happiness. Do not back down. In the meantime, be clear. Kennedy’s words can be as lethal as the smallpox virus. Americans deserve better.
, Scientific American
Religious freedom—actual religious freedom—depends on preventing the incursion of any and all religious beliefs, whether they are masquerading as alternative scientific theories or blatantly evangelizing, into public schools. We must protect every child’s right to a public education that is free of religious indoctrination and prepares them to navigate the many challenges of the real world as modern science understands it.
, UW Medicine
Medical research is core to UW Medicine's mission to improve the health of all people. Academic medical center research is essential for improving quality of life for everyone. It offers hope to those in need, generates job opportunities and drives economic growth in our communities. At UW Medicine, we understand the challenges faced by those affected by serious health conditions. With one of the largest medical research programs globally, we are dedicated to empowering our scientists to make significant strides in knowledge and health innovations through groundbreaking discoveries. The UW School of Medicine's research community fosters meaningful collaborations with thousands of colleagues both nationally and around the world. Our researchers know collective efforts lead to better outcomes for everyone.
Unconstitutional Acts / Legal Remedies
18May2025
, Robert Hubbell
The Trump administration has been an ongoing constitutional violation since Inauguration Day. The courts are catching up. ... the Trump administration has adopted the tactic of slow-walking judicial and congressional consideration of those specious arguments. That development should give us hope and confidence that justice will prevail ultimately, and possibly sooner rather than later!
... the Trump administration ... retreating on two significant legal matters: The question of birthright citizenship and the ability of the president to “impound” funds appropriated by Congress. ... Trump's retreat is a testament to the outstanding work of legal advocacy organizations like the,, , , , (LULAC), , , and many others.
At a time when the largest and most powerful firms in the American legal profession continue to bow and scrape before Trump, firms like Arnold & Porter are rightfully highlighting their pro bono work as they deliver on their commitment to underserved and vulnerable communities. See the linked video on Arnold & Porter’s website for insight into how firms can and should step up to their professional and ethical commitments: . [good video]
Suggesting that birthright citizenship as a US citizen would depend on the state of one’s birth is ludicrous and cuts at the foundation of the United States of America. The Solicitor General of the US was forced to make such absurd arguments because the administration is desperate to avoid a ruling on the merits of Trump's executive order. ... We have the administration on the run. We need to keep up the pressure, with the help of legal advocacy organizations and principled law firms.
The “cuts” by DOGE are unconstitutional. All of them. It is a bedrock principle of the Constitution that Congress appropriates funds and the president “faithfully executes” the laws that appropriate those funds. By withholding (“impounding”) funds appropriated by Congress, Trump is violating the Constitution. Every day. That ongoing constitutional violation is a scandal that is being ignored by the media. Trump is now seeking to avoid a confrontation in Congress, testing his ongoing unconstitutional conduct. He is again in retreat—because he does not want to know the answer that Congress will give. ... Cases challenging the unconstitutional impoundments are wending their way through the federal courts. ... If Trump were to ask Congress to ratify his unconstitutional cuts, he would need to identify the nature and amount of those cuts. In effect, Trump would be asking for forgiveness for his unlawful cuts when he should have sought permission.
A final note on the Supreme Court. Readers have understandable anxiety every time the Supreme Court hears a case challenging Trump’s unlawful actions. The anxiety is understandable given the Court’s atrocious decisions in Dobbs and Trump v. US (and others).
But we should not shrink from pushing for Supreme Court review of Trump’s actions. We need to know which side of democracy the Court is on. While I have very modest hopes that we will receive some support from the Court, we need to know sooner rather than later if the Court will abandon us again. ... If the Court does abandon us, we may need to change tactics. Let’s find out and move on. The Court isn’t going to save us. It might help us. Or not. Either way, it is up to us. It always is. And we are up to the task.
, Robert Reich
On Tuesday, Judge Dugan was indicted for obstructing a federal agency and concealing an undocumented immigrant who was being sought by federal officers at the Milwaukee County Courthouse. The charges carry a maximum penalty of six years in prison and a $350,000 fine. Yesterday, Judge Dugan pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The background: On April 18, Judge Dugan presided over a pretrial hearing in a domestic abuse case against Flores-Ruiz, a Mexican immigrant. Federal officials gathered in the hallway outside her courtroom, planning to arrest Flores-Ruiz for being in the country illegally. But Judge Dugan — not wanting her courtroom or the courthouse to become a place where undocumented immigrants feared to appear — directed Flores-Ruiz through a different exit than the public door that led to the hallway where agents were waiting.
Yesterday outside the courthouse several hundred against the Trump regime’s treatment of Dugan and its immigration crackdown in Milwaukee. People in the crowd held signs that read, “We are a nation of laws,” “Defend Democracy,” and “Only Fascists Arrest Judges.” One speaker led the crowd in chants of “Hands off Hannah Dugan” and “Hands off our immigrant brothers and sisters.”
Earlier this month, more than 150 former state and federal judges signed a to Attorney General Pam Bondi calling the arrest of Judge Dugan an attempt to intimidate the judiciary. “This cynical effort undermines the rule of law,” that letter said, “and destroys the trust the American people have in the nation’s judges to administer justice in the courtrooms and in the halls of justice across the land.”
25May2025
, David Kurtz, TPM
... nothing will have as long-lasting and damaging an effect on American democracy as the Supreme Court’s yesterday to upend 90 years of its own precedent and .
The high court’s six-justice conservative majority fundamentally altered the structural balance of power among the branches of the federal government. It handed vast new power to the White House to put politics above expertise, partisanship above reason, and power over principle....
One wonders how independent agencies will even function. They were created and have existed over the course of nearly a century under a certain set of assumptions about the importance of experts, consistency in policy-making, and insulation from partisan politics. What is their use or reason for being now if they’re merely appendages of the White House doing its bidding?
With unitary executive theory, Congress cannot write robust new legislation that modernizes the civil service and stops politicization. A President could just ignore it. Even if Trump leaves office, and a new President looks to restore nonpartisan competence, their promises are only good for four or eight years before another President can come in and rip up the terms of their employment. And over time, why would even a good government President invest effort in restoring capacity if their successor can undermine it?
With unitary executive theory, the public sector becomes permanently viewed as an unstable and chaotic workplace that we are seeing now. The most capable potential employees decide its not worth the bother, and the workforce becomes a mix of people who cannot get a job elsewhere, and short term political appointees.
1June2025
, Josh Marshall, Talking Points Memo
I don’t, for starters, buy that Musk is really leaving government service at all, though the fact that a of DOGE adds a bit more credibility to the claim. ... Remember, he used DOGE to scoop up lots of contracts. I doubt he wants to lose those. But others would like them, too. That means he’ll have to remain involved.
The bigger problem with this storyline is the idea that Musk failed. .... To believe that you’d need to buy the idea that the goal was to streamline the government and save a bunch of money as opposed to gut the parts of the government that Trump world and the Silicon Valley right view as enemies and do so in an at best extra-constitutional fashion because it would never be possible through constitutional means. He succeeded at doing quite a lot of that, at least for now. He wrecked whole sections of the government and scooped up a ton of government contracts which not only further feathered his nest but advances the privatization of the government. He also engaged in a still-too-little-understood effort to create a vast store of integrated private information on U.S. citizens. ... As I said, I’d love it if Musk failed. But he didn’t. .... He ran an anti-constitutional blitzkrieg through the federal government, did massive harm, violated a slew of criminal laws. And he only tired of his antics when the reputational harm to his companies became steep enough to really endanger them. He’s a destructive crook who needs to be held accountable for his actions. ...
, Michelle Goldberg, NYTimes
Musk’s absurd scheme to save the government a trillion dollars by slashing “waste, fraud and abuse” has been a failure. The Department of Government Efficiency claims it’s saved $175 billion, but experts the real number is significantly lower. Meanwhile, according to the Partnership for Public Service, which studies the federal work force, DOGE’s attacks on government personnel — its firings, rehirings, use of paid administrative leave and all the associated lack of productivity — couldthe government upwards of $135 billion this fiscal year, even before the price of defending DOGE’s actions in court. Musk’s rampage through the bureaucracy might not have created any savings at all, and if it did, they were negligible. ... He did indeed shred the United States Agency for International Development [USAID]. ... it has terminated more than 80 percent of U.S.A.I.D. grants. ... [In 4 months] , most of them of children, ... Musk apparently did not anticipate that it would be bad P.R. for the world’s richest man to take food and medicine from the world’s poorest children. ... If there were justice in the world, Musk would never be able to repair his reputation, at least not without devoting the bulk of his fortune to easing the misery he’s engendered. ...
[Comment] Legal advocacy groups should draw up an indictment of Musk and his minions and wage a big public campaign to take him before the International Criminal Court. Other advocacy groups should promote a boycott of companies associated with him. Democratic Congress members should fight against government subsidies and contracts to his companies. He may never be held legally accountable, but it should be easy to blacken his reputation for good.
8June2025
E, Senator Elizabeth Warren’s Office
Donald Trump’s presidency has been profitable for Elon Musk. Since Election Day, Musk’s staggering net worth has increased by over $100 billion. While serving as a “Special Government Employee” in the White House and leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk has maintained extensive financial conflicts of interest through his ownership or stake in several private and publicly traded companies: Tesla, SpaceX, X and xAI, the Boring Company, and Neuralink. Before Trump took office, Musk’s companies faced at least $2.37 billion in potential liability from pending agency enforcement actions. Now many of those enforcement actions have stalled or been dismissed. Musk’s companies have received or are being considered for large contracts with the federal government, with foreign governments, and with other private sector companies. Musk and individuals acting on his behalf have been involved in dozens of questionable actions that raise questions about corruption, ethics, and conflicts of interest.
29June2025
Rebecca Solnit
Elie Mystal : "The legal upshot of the Supreme Court’s monumentally disastrous decision in ('the birthright citizenship case') is chaos. Utter legal chaos. ...the ruling doesn’t actually allow Trump to end birthright citizenship. It just makes it incredibly difficult for courts to stop him from ending birthright citizenship. ...Every person has to individually ask for their constitutional rights. It’s everyone for themselves, .... Everybody needs to lawyer up. The decision means that some courts, districts, and states will still defend the concept of birthright citizenship, while others will not. That could mean that whether or not a child born in America on or after June 27, 2025, is considered a citizen of the United States will depend on what state, or even county, that child happens to be born in." The decision is specifically an attack on the Fourteenth Amendment, which grants citizenship to all who are born here, ... Justice Sotomayor in her dissent addressed this, "Children born in the United States and subject to its laws are United States citizens. That has been the legal rule since the founding, and it was the English rule well before then. ... the States passed in 1866 and Congress ratified in 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which enshrined birthright citizenship in the Constitution. There it has remained, accepted and respected by Congress, by the Executive, and by this Court. Until today." ... Her language--that short sentence that is not a sentence, those two words ending her opening--makes it clear how grave the breach is. She goes on, "It is now the President who attempts, in an Executive Order (Order or Citizenship Order), to repudiate birthright citizenship. Every court to evaluate the Order has deemed it patently unconstitutional and, for that reason, has enjoined the Federal Government from enforcing it. Undeterred, the Government now asks this Court to grant emergency relief, insisting it will suffer irreparable harm unless it can deprive at least some children born in the United States of citizenship." ... Justice Jackson ... added this fierce sentence: "I agree with every word of Justice Sotomayor's dissent. I write separately to emphasize a key conceptual point: The Court’s decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law."
Disinformation / Media / Free Press
18May2025
Trump Slashes Research on Disinformation
Science Magazine, ,
The research doesn’t suppress speech—quite the opposite, says Lisa Fazio, a researcher at Vanderbilt University whose $500,000 NSF grant to study how false beliefs form and how to correct them was cut. “Telling you that science thinks you’re wrong isn’t censoring your belief,” she says. “It’s more speech. It’s the freedom of speech of the fact checkers, the journalists, whoever’s writing the debunk to say, ‘I’ve looked at this evidence, and this is what I think it says.’”
Ending the research, in contrast, is “an overt act of censoring and preventing accountability,” says Stephan Lewandowsky, a misinformation researcher at the University of Bristol. “Who other than a liar would cancel misinformation research?”
25May2025
,
We need a common, positive identity. If you are against oligarchy, then you are for POPULISM. Either our government serves the PEOPLE or it serves the FEW. Either our economy serves the PEOPLE or it serves the FEW. Those are the options. Which side are you on? ... Real populism is driven by radical empathy and righteous anger. Either our government serves the PEOPLE or it serves the FEW. Either our economy serves the PEOPLE or it serves the FEW. Populism is being on the side of the people.
There is a reason why Republicans try to demonize every name we have for ourselves. Identities have power. Human beings are inherently tribal. The urge to belong, to identify as part of a community and feel like you have a valued place within it, is not only the most powerful driver of political behavior, but possibly of all social behavior.
It matters to put a name to our cause. It matters to be able to say, “I am a populist,” to be able to answer the question, “What are we for?” As the man said, “The world and its inhabitants have value and are worth defending.”
We are for the people.
EMPHASIZE THE CLEAN ENERGY BOOM: Clean energy is driving job creation, reducing energy costs, improving public health, and supporting economic development. Partner with businesses, schools, labor groups, and nonprofits to amplify messaging that matters locally.
LOCAL STORIES ARE ESSENTIAL: ... tell real, personal stories that illustrate how clean energy programs benefit individuals, schools, businesses, and underserved communities.
USE DATA, MAPS, AND DIRECT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TO FIND AND SHARE STORIES: Leverage tools like the , and the to find clean energy projects near you.
, Grassroots Connector Substack
Critical thinking brings logic, reason, and skepticism to the 24/7 rumor mill. To think critically means to apply time-tested questions to so-called truths before they go viral. Here are the basics:
1. Do you have all the information? In Thinking Fast and Slow, psychologist Daniel Kahnemann named a common thinking flaw, the assumption that “What You See is All There Is.” You might think you’re getting the full story but you’re probably not. Go digging.
2. Is the latest gossip “too good to be true?” “Too good” means its implications are all favorable to one party, all bad news for the other. Life — and politics — are rarely so black-and-white, and seeking nuance can reveal hidden agendas.
3. What group stands to gain? Just as courtroom lawyers ask “cui bono?” (who benefits from a crime?), ask who benefits from any “truth.” Also ask who it stands to hurt. The answers should lead to further questioning.
4. Have you considered the source? Don’t believe anything friends tell you they “heard from a friend!” If the source is from the mainstream media, ask whether they employ fact-checkers and issue corrections for errors. If the source is “independent media” (like Substack), read the source’s other posts to see “where they’re coming from.” And when checking into an independent website, click on “About Us” to see who runs the site and who funds the site. Now find out who this “Us” supported in recent elections.
5. Have you considered the sentiment? Real news is repeated with solemnity. Fake news is repeated with glee.
6. Evidence, please? It’s not enough to say “everyone knows” or “well, it’s just common sense. . .” Find concrete evidence from multiple vetted sources, i.e., sources proven reliable by reputation for accuracy, respected awards (a Peabody, a Pulitzer), and by peer reviews.
7. Have you factored in common biases? Not just “confirmation bias” that leads us to trust what confirms our beliefs but also 1) “availability bias” that strengthens allegations you most recently heard; 2) “anchoring” which stubbornly ties us to initial evidence; and 3) “perseverence bias” that makes changing your mind so hard. (There are dozens more.)
8. Have you followed Ronald Reagan’s advice — “trust but verify”? Never take anyone’s word for anything. Never use just a single source to prove a point. And never assume that any side — yours or mine or your uncle’s — is always right.
There’s not much riding on this other than the future of democracy. In 2020, Barack Obama summed up the danger: “If we do not have the capacity to distinguish what’s true from what’s false, then by definition the marketplace of ideas doesn’t work. And by definition our democracy doesn’t work.”
For more on critical thinking, consider:
— How to Win the War on Truth, by Samuel Spitale.
— The Misinformation Age: How False Beliefs Spread, by Cailin O’Connor.
— The Constitution of Knowledge, by Jonathan Rauch.
Be careful, be suspicious. It’s a jungle out there.
1June2025
, Gil Duran
Yuval Noah Harari
AI is the first information technology where the "written word" interprets itself, with the human out of the loop? ... You can also find the book in your friendly neighborhood public library (, , )!
, Scientific American
The latest version of Grok, the chatbot created by Elon Musk’s xAI, is promoting fringe climate viewpoints in a way it hasn’t done before ... The language learning models that power AI chatbots are “really quite malleable and you can change the kind of results they give,” Dessler said. “They're not tied to any absolute truth or anything like that and if you want one to lie to you, you can tell it to do that. If you want it to give you a particular viewpoint, you can do that.” ... “Malicious people can use Grok to intentionally generate climate misinformation to sow doubt about scientific consensus or environmental movements,” ... “As we go into the future, more and more people are going to get their information from these AIs,” Dessler said. “Obviously, the concern is that someone's going to do something like this to mislead people.”
8June2025
, Antonia Scatton
We need to get proactive and SET THE AGENDA to promote the stories and issues that we want the American public exposed to. ... It’s our job to use the resources available to us to repeatedly expose people to “the way we see things” until they adopt our perspective as their own. ... You have a mission to impact the minds of persuadable members of the American public. Your voice and your time are valuable assets. Make strategic decisions about how to spend those limited resources.
TALK ABOUT THIS
15June2025
, Ben Shread-Hewitt
AI is not destiny. It is a tool — a powerful, seductive, double-edged tool. In the fight against climate change, it can be a weapon in our service or one that backfires. Its future, if it is to have any hope of being a climate tool, must be wrested from cult-like visions and the devastating feedback loops that — at this time — seem hardwired into it. The choice depends not on the code itself, but on the systems we build to control it, and the institutions we task with its oversight.
, Popular Information Substack
Over the weekend, for example, the Trump administration ordered 2,000 members of the California National Guard to be deployed to in Los Angeles about Trump’s immigration policies. The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) described Saturday’s protests as “peaceful.” But Trump deployed the National Guard anyway, against the wishes of state and local officials. The protests were centered around federal immigration raids at workplaces in the greater Los Angeles area.
Trump's recent actions in Los Angeles are part of a sustained, multi-pronged attack on freedom of speech, targeting anyone who does not share Trump’s political ideology. A Popular Information investigation identified 22 actions taken by the Trump administration that undermine the principle of freedom of speech.
22June2025
, 3rd Act Magazine
Arizona Senator Mark Kelly (D), who serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee, estimates that Russia, Iran, and China are now generating between 20 percent to 30 percent of the political content and comments on social media. MAGA Republicans are making things worse by willingly echoing foreign propaganda to their constituents. ... We can guard against credulity and cynicism by cultivating compassionate, open-minded skepticism; a mindset that is comfortable with ambiguity and uncertainty, that encourages careful evaluation, intellectual flexibility, and curious inquiry in the service of the common good. We can model compassionate skepticism for our grandchildren, and prepare them, as best we can, to recognize and deflect the disinformation that is likely to fill the media landscape of their future.
DISINFORMATION TRICKS
AI (artificial intelligence) and Deepfakes: Highly believable AI-generated photos, videos, or audio clips show people saying and doing things they haven’t done. Check with Politifact or Snopes.com to verify.
Fake News Sites: These sites and reports look like news but are really propaganda. Don’t Google to verify weird stories—you will just find the same or similar propaganda articles. Check credible sources like Snopes.com, the BBC, The AP or PBS.
Astroturfing: Fake comments, blog posts, and news articles repeat lies and conspiracy theories to make them seem true and popular. Ignore and don’t respond.
False Equivalence: These are comparisons that sound plausible but don’t really make sense. [“Taxes are like armed robbery. They both take your money by force.”] They are designed to get us to agree without thinking it through. Take the time to think it through.
Attacking the Person, Not the Issue: This trick deflects attention away from the real issues and triggers emotion responses that can cloud our judgment. Bring your attention, and the conversation, back to the issue.
Rage Farming: Making outrageous and offensive statements are designed to infuriate us, capture our attention, and get us to respond and expand the reach of the offensive lies. IGNORE THEM.
Lying With Science: Science is hard to interpret. Liars use confusing science jargon and bad research to support their false claims. Check with multiple science experts.
The D.Y.O.R Trap: Liars will bolster their lies by challenging us to D.Y.O.R.—“Do Your Own Research”—knowing most of us won’t. If you do, don’t just Google outrageous statements. Google a conspiracy theory and you will find more conspiracy theories. Fact check with FactCheck.org or Snopes.com.
False Choice: These are misleading either/or constructions such as “Do you want to save the climate, or save the economy?” Reject either/or scenarios. We can have a strong economy and protect the environment.
Cherry Picking: This trick supports a lie by using a carefully chosen bit of data and ignoring the rest of the story. “It snowed in April. So much for climate warming!” Is it data, or just a story (anecdotal)? Put things into context and look at the complete picture.
6July2025
As autocratic regimes around the world increasingly and academic freedom, a team of researchers has published a new to help scientists protect their personal safety and their work. The new handbook is a timely resource “given the unprecedented assault on American science, academia, scientists and truth by the Trump administration, Republican Congress, and an increasingly politicized Supreme Court,” water and climate researcher Peter Gleick, with the , wrote via email. “It offers clear descriptions of the kinds of threats and authoritarian tactics we now face. More importantly, it offers options and strategies for pushing back, depending on if the threats one personally faces are low, medium or high.” Gleick said the handbook also includes good suggestions for helping both scientists and nonscientists advocate for science by engaging with the media and elected officials, as well as how to reach out to younger generations and students. And it’s accompanied by an, where people can share stories, warnings and advice. It defines authoritarianism this way: “The concentration of power in the hands of a small group of people who act in ways that are not constitutionally accountable to the people they are meant to represent and serve.” Core hallmarks of autocrats include rejecting democratic rules, denying the legitimacy of opponents, tolerating or encouraging political violence, curtailing opponents’ civil liberties and breaking down social cohesion to divide and rule a society,
TheAnti-AutocracyHandbook(A4)-1.pdf
490.6 kB
13July2025
, Frameworks Institute
, Frameworks Institute
, Frameworks Institute
The good news is: our communications can activate more collective ways of thinking that highlight our inherent interconnectedness—not our constructed divides.
, Anat Shenker-Osorio
Trump and MAGA have escalated the pace and scope of their power grab – with particular cruelty inflicted on a long-favored target: immigrants. We must take care not to obscure MAGA’s crimes by referring to raids, abductions, and travel bans as “immigration policy.” “Immigration” is the movement of people into a country for purposes of residency. While the above actions do concern immigrants, they are not about immigration but rather the dehumanization, imprisonment, and harassment of human beings based on what they look like and where they come from. ... MAGA relies upon deliberately constructed, repeated refrains to lend normalcy, legitimacy and even righteousness to their actions. When we sanitize their actions or echo their refrains, for example, calling the Florida facility “Alligator Alcatraz,” we aid their cause. This is a concentration camp. It’s not merely accuracy at stake; naming this facility a “concentration camp” contextualizes this horrific new assault within a well-known fascist playbook. It decimates the anesthetizing fiction that “it could not happen here,” which impedes our ability to bring a wide array of actors into withdrawing consent for what is, in fact, happening. Policy for how to approach the border and rules around newcomers are areas of real debate in a democratic society; concentration camps are not. We must choose words that make clear to our audiences exactly what is at stake, exposing the motivations of the MAGA regime and generating the will to be in continuous opposition to it.
27July2025
, The Journalist’s Resource
Journalists and public health experts shared 12 strategies for building trust, using careful language and improving coverage of health misinformation during a workshop at the Association of Health Care Journalists' annual conference.
The Trump Administration, Congressional Republicans, and their billionaire allies officially passed their Billionaire Tax Scam—their plan to cut taxes for the rich at the expense of working people. Now is the time to call out what this law really is and what the impact will be: an egregious plan to slash programs families rely on to pay for more billionaire tax breaks and lawless immigration raids. This is likely the most important time to control the narrative about what just happened. We need to flood the zone with what this bill does and keep our message loud and clear: the Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans just cut your healthcare and raised your costs in order to give massive tax cuts to billionaires.
,
The Trump Tax will cost the poorest 10% of households $1,600 a year while raising the income of the richest 10% of Americans by $12,000 a year. 17 million Americans are losing their health care coverage. More than 22 million working families could lose some of their food benefits. This law will affect all of us. The Trump Tax will explode the deficit by $3.3 trillion — leading to higher inflation, higher energy bills, and higher grocery and prescription drug costs. Experts warn that Trump has put us on a collision course with an economic crisis.
Words carry weight, especially when covering emotionally charged topics like vaccines. The language you choose can either open a door or shut it, ... For instance, the term “misinformation” can be problematic in journalism because it often signals judgment rather than understanding.
2. Verify everything — including government sources.
Take extra precautions in your reporting at a time when uncertainty about the scientific evidence behind the data and information posted on federal health websites continues to mount.
3. Trust your audience with information. They can handle nuance.
Oversimplifying information to protect the public can backfire. ... Rather than hiding uncertainty or nuance, be transparent about what’s still under investigation or debated.
4. Lead with empathy, not confrontation, to build trust.
“Our conversations are too often focused on opinions and not on experience,” Friedhoff said. “That’s where the storytelling framework comes in. Once we start asking them about their experiences, entirely different stories emerge, and they allow us to go into some of their motivations.”
5. Meet people where they are.
Instead of insisting on scientific language or your preferred sources, look for ways to meet people on their turf ... Presenting reliable information from a source the audience already trusts can lower their defenses and open their minds.
6. Bolster facts and data with personal stories.
Facts matter, but they don’t always persuade. Humans are wired for stories. “Ethos and pathos always trump logos in our brain,” Haelle said. In short: make them feel, then help them understand.
7. Provide on-ramps to complex topics for audiences.
... rather than diving straight into complex health topics, provide entry points, like simple explainers that answer questions like “What is measles?” or “How do vaccines work?” These on-ramps increase comprehension and reduce disengagement,
8. Be transparent about your reporting process.
Letting audiences see behind the curtain can build trust. ... explain why they chose to cover a story, what sources they used and how they verified facts.
9. Choose quotes with strategic care.
Quoting someone as a way to present both sides of an issue can give harmful ideas undue credibility...You can also use the “” method: Start with the truth. Indicate the falsehood. Return to the truth.
10. Ask your audience what they need, to show them you’re listening.
When you’re not sure how to cover health rumors and falsehoods in your community, start by asking your audience directly.
11. Keep reporting on the topic.
Instead of thinking only about the initial piece, plan for continuity: follow up with updates, second-day stories, explainers, or even long-form features that deepen the original reporting.
12. Explain how science works, not just what it says.
Instead of seeing change as a failure, audiences need help understanding that revision is how science proves itself. Explain : What a hypothesis is, how studies are tested, and why evolving conclusions reflect a system that corrects itself.
Resources
The onslaught of news, the chaos coming out of the White House – it’s all meant to overwhelm us. It’s a deliberate strategy to sow confusion and make us believe we are powerless to fight back. The antidote: Coming together in community to process what’s happening, to sift through what’s important and what’s just noise, and coalesce around strategies for fighting back. Join Indivisible co-founders Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin each week, as we carve out an hour to discuss what’s happening and – more importantly – what’s the plan.
Urge your state's Democratic attorney general to stop ICE overreach and protect the right to dissent
10August2025
, DemLabs
"Democracy dies in darkness. It also withers behind a paywall, is manipulated by social media algorithms and hollowed out by covert corporate consolidation. The shadow cast by self-interested billionaires grows larger by the day, muzzling any truth that conflicts with their bottom line." - , CEO of Common Cause in .
Find the right newsletter in a flash
Search the newsletter app "" by title, author or the description of the newsletter.
Don't fall for billionaire owned corporate media B.S.
Billionaires seem to have a thing for media ownership. Deep-pocketed, high-profile investors have spent fortunes acquiring mass communication platforms, including newspapers, magazines, and even . -
, Grassroots Connector Substack
The word is out: billboards reach people who are captives of the right-wing propaganda machine. Earlier this year, Indivisible National raised money for billboards in purple districts held by Republicans. Now it is raising funds for billboards highlighting .
The beauty of both billboards and radio ads is that they can be placed easily and inexpensively, with the help of the . RFN’s three principals, Sherwood Guernsey, Ben Hillman, and Lee Harrison, have decades of experience in political messaging. Most professional messaging experts are expensive, but Guernsey, Hillman, and Harrison volunteer their time and expertise, only charging $500 per billboard design or radio ad production to cover expenses. That means for about $2,500 groups can place a billboard, or a bunch of radio ads in districts now held by Republican House members.
Civic Uprising / People Power
18May2025
, The White Pages Substack
and link to articles that reinforce the sentiment. Add a second code that will , or perhaps even offer a date and time for a community meeting that you’re hosting. Hang up the signs across your region— rural areas, cities and suburbs. Go to a small town’s Main Street and put signs on every corner: It’s true, by the way, and small businesses should know about it.
than you imagined. When people ask you how you’re doing, say “I’m trying a new thing– I’m getting involved with ______ mutual aid, have you heard of it?”
as
. Join. Agitate. Know that we won’t turn the tide if we can’t get union density back in the double digits.
see some of the recommended books
, Anat Shenker-Osorio
Yes, a majority of people agreeing with your view means nothing. But a majority of people opposing your view is similarly meaningless — if you can get a small sliver to not merely agree but sustain robust action. Civil rights — , and — were unpopular in their day. Until, that is, average Americans saw with their own eyes the courage and righteousness of people boycotting, sitting in, and protesting in the face of horrific repression. The notion of a Muslim ban in Trump’s first run at office until people rushed off to airports to offer free legal help and voice their objections. their disapproval led to shifting public attitudes, and this campaign promise. And while the swift Republican-engineered backlash has memory-holed it, the resurgence of Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of the police murder of George Floyd for the cause by double digits. Tragically, that .
Sometimes, the first move you make is wildly unpopular. But doing it doesn’t merely move you toward your goal, it alters the majority public opinion many Democrats are so feverishly chasing. Actions shift how people perceive what is occurring — what is at stake, who are the villains, victims, and heroes — and which issues are most salient to consider next time people vote. They can change the dynamic of a future election from one that is about, say, “the border” and “law and order,” to one that is about wresting our freedoms and our families, our lives and our livelihoods, from the grip of billionaires hell-bent on our destruction. We cannot poll, cajole Democrats, or even vote our way to democracy. We must take to the streets and demand it.
Make It So, Jane Fonda Video
25May2025
, The Ground Game Substack
WHAT MOBILIZING ACTUALLY DOES
Mobilizing begins with a countdown clock. ...
The assignment is simple and brutal: convert latent sympathy into visible pressure before the clock hits zero. Lists matter more than deep relationships, message discipline more than philosophical depth, and friction-free tech beats Robert’s Rules every time....
WHAT ORGANIZING ACTUALLY DOES
Organizing starts ... with a power map. ... What exact decision must flip, and by when? Who can actually say “yes” or “no,” and who whispers in their ear? What do those actors prize most, votes, profit, reputation, stability, and where is that prize exposed? Which organized people, money, and narrative can we already marshal, or quickly build, to press on that nerve? Finally, what public action will convert our assets into a cost they can’t ignore or a benefit they crave? Those five questions sketch the first draft of any serious campaign plan.
Organizing opens a power chart. Names, institutions, and the relationships connecting them get pinned like circuitry. The questions are: Who has unilateral authority? Who influences them? What do they fear or need? That map dictates the next six months of one-to-ones, leadership development plans, and steadily escalating structure tests designed to move a small number of decisive people.
Mobilizing opens a turnout model. Districts or precincts are stacked in a spreadsheet, every row tagged with target universes, contact rates, and vote goals. The questions are: Where is our vote margin hiding? How many persuadables can we touch per shift? How many dials, doors, or ads do we need to close the gap before the buzzer sounds?
Both models are essential, yet neither is sufficient alone. ...
?, If You Can Keep It Substack
I find democracy is best explained through its benefits. ... the rule of law, individual rights, and electoral freedom.
The rule of law, fairness, and predictability
The United States is a remarkably prosperous country. That success is directly thanks to our democratic systems, institutions, and processes that ensure predictable, fair, and rules-based outcomes.
Democracy is good for business. ... that’s not true when an autocratic leader with no safeguards can make impulsive or self-serving economic policy decisions. …like, say, a and the global trade system?
That predictability — that impartiality — helps ensure our freedom. Otherwise, we’re all at the whims of people with power.
Individual rights and the restraints on power
In our day-to-day lives, many of us don’t spend much time thinking about our rights: to speak our minds, to travel freely, to worship as we wish, to feel safe and secure in our homes, to earn a living, to love and marry, to criticize the powerful, and to not be arbitrarily and indefinitely imprisoned. But in reality, everything around us is built on the foundation of fundamental rights like and and and ....
Often, these violations of individual rights start with — and are built around — centralized databases and surveillance structures to monitor citizens. The more the government knows about you, the more options it has to potentially curtail your basic freedoms.
Right now, the Trump administration and DOGE are to build a massive, unified database of all Americans. We don’t know what this database will be used for.
Whatever its purpose, trust me: Our rights are worth protecting before they’re dismantled, not after.
Electoral freedom and the ability to choose our leaders
Finally, elections. If I had to pick one of the many single definitions of democracy, I’d go with ...
Democracy is a system in which parties lose elections.
... It’s not just that we the people get to select our leaders — and therefore have a say in policy decisions (although obviously that’s important). It’s that we have a failsafe way to remove leaders from power when we inevitably need to do so.
8June2025
, Corbin Trent, America’s Undoing
We need an ideological revolution that rejects the lies we've been taught:
* That government is the problem (when corporations are)
* That markets self-regulate (when they self-destruct)
* That incremental change works (when we need transformation)
* That the rules are sacred (when they're rigged)
We need people willing to use power the way FDR did - to fundamentally restructure the economy. To break monopolies. To build public alternatives. To treat concentrated wealth as the threat to democracy that it is. This isn't about left vs. right anymore. It's about whether we'll remain corporate subjects or become citizens again.
We need to envision this across every sector that's been captured by monopoly power:
Childcare: Not just subsidies for private centers that jack up prices, but publicly run childcare facilities in every community
Housing: Not just affordable housing mandates, but the government as a major homebuilder competing directly with private developers
Energy: Not just regulating utilities, but public power generation and distribution that puts private monopolies out of business
Banking: Not just better regulations, but public banks that offer real alternatives to Wall Street
Broadband: Not just net neutrality, but municipal networks that make Comcast obsolete
Transportation: Not just subsidizing private companies, but building public alternatives that actually work
What we're talking about is a reset of our entire market system. We need to re-ignite real competition - and the only way to do that in a system this captured, this monopolized, this sold out is through massive public competition.
22June2025
, Stanford Social Research Institute
We are living in a moment of great fear. Autocratic governments, nihilistic oligarchs, escalating climate impacts, dynamic pandemics, menacing technologies, rampant misinformation—all of these forces and more conspire to leave Americans and people around the world feeling less safe, more uncertain, and more frightened about the future. While entirely justified, this anxiety is, in and of itself, the greatest enemy of all to an effective response, undermining the solidarity, creativity, and action we so desperately need.
Newer Methods
Traditional Methods
Perhaps the most important question of all, however, is to determine how these powerful mass actions can become more well-known and durable. In a moment when authoritarianism and wealth consolidation are on the rise, people need to understand the many methods available to expand their power, viewing them as more than extraordinary, sporadic phenomena. New and existing forms of mass action are extremely timely and feasible, and they deserve a more prominent place in our thinking and our strategies.
These approaches to rapid, large-scale combination have remarkable potential to advance justice and knowledge. If we can pool our time and treasure to eliminate debt for millions of neighbors, disrupt corporate predation and put millions of acres under protection, what else can we accomplish? If we can comprehensively document the natural world and inform global research, what else might we learn? If we can harness the economic and political will of billions toward fairness and redistribution, what kind of power might we gain?
3August2025
, The Ground Game Substack
Today’s political moment, marked by rising authoritarianism, intensifying inequality, and escalating climate and social crises, demands that we raise our sights beyond the ballot box. Young people need movements that don't simply show up for elections but remain deeply rooted in communities, committed to lasting policy shifts and cultural change.
Advocacy - start by cutting a clear, winnable issue rather than chasing sweeping abstractions. Your demand should be concrete and specific , naming the exact policy or budget line you want to change, whether that’s restoring community mental health funding or enacting campus climate resolutions. ... Train community ambassadors, especially youth leaders, with data, personal stories, and succinct “asks,” so they can testify at hearings, engage local media, and persuade peers. ...
Base-Building - Begin with mapping and listening: identify the neighborhoods, campus hubs, faith centers, and digital spaces where young people gather, then build a living map of opportunity using census data alongside insights from canvass hits and social media analytics. Host small-group listening sessions, story circles and structured interviews, to understand the issues that keep your peers up at night and the assets they already bring to the table. ... Leadership development must be woven into every stage. ... Base-building organizations focus on membership recruitment, leadership development, and relationship building, positioning everyday people to hold decision-makers accountable and influence policy. ...
Civic Engagement - ... Start by offering accessible political-analysis workshops that break down local decision-making processes: convene small-group “civic study circles” where participants map who holds authority on issues they care about, track upcoming votes, and practice asking incisive questions. ... Host regular in-person gatherings, in community centers, faith halls, or school cafeterias, where neighbors share their concerns, pool insights, and co-design action plans. Encourage participants to pair up and attend public meetings together, swapping notes and offering mutual support. These face-to-face interactions forge trust, deepen commitment, and create “missing spaces” where young people, non-citizens, and returning residents alike can build the social bonds that sustain collective action ... Recruit diverse emerging leaders and immerse them in modules on power mapping, relational outreach, campaign strategy, and media engagement. ...
Development - Central to leadership development ... Convene regular campaign meetings where participants unpack case studies, from zoning battles to school board skirmishes, identify who holds authority, where leverage lies, and how alliances shift over time.
Electoral Programs -... To win, start by clearly defining your political goals, whether that’s flipping state legislative seats, electing progressive champions to city councils, or defeating harmful ballot measures. Target your resources strategically by using advanced voter data to map the electorate, ...
Immigrants / Free Speech / DEI
25May2025
, The Big Picture Substack
When I write about the latest horrific policy or action by the Trump administration, often a reader will comment, “The cruelty is the point.” ... We need to look behind that cruelty and ask the harder question: But what’s the goal? ...
Fascism creates a myth of victimhood, that the majority population is in a humiliating decline from a past greatness because of singled-out minority populations. It’s an us-against-them crisis, the myth goes. The targeted racial, ethnic, religious or gender minorities, and the “liberals” who support them, are thus framed as not just opponents but enemies, demonized so the majority can feel justified in hating and repressing them. ... He is trying to divide us, to make us fear and despise other human beings who live in our communities, and to gain power from that division and fear. ...
The administration well understands what happens when it metes out punishment against alleged “undesirable” social elements and the perceived enemies of the administration. Corporations, law firms, media companies, and even major universities scrambled to stay on Trump’s good side so that they wouldn’t become the next target. They capitulated with little to no actual resistance, just like the entire Republican Party has done.
This erodes the traditional safeguards of our civil liberties while giving a big assist to the project of MAGA authoritarianism.
Recently, the White House announced it was ending Temporary Protective Status (TPS) for hundreds of thousands of refugees from war-torn, dangerous, and stricken parts of the world, from Haiti to Afghanistan.
As a result of this ruling and Noem’s draconian order, the lives of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, along with millions of their families and friends, have suddenly been upended. Many justifiably fear what will happen to them next. Will they be seized off the street or out of their cars? Will they be held indefinitely in decrepit and dangerous ICE detention facilities? Will they be sent back to their native country or instead to a third country, perhaps even to prison there? ... CBS of 75 percent of the 238 men sent to CECOT and could find no evidence of any criminal record whatsoever. And just yesterday, the CATO Institute released a that 50 of the Venezuelans now imprisoned there came to the U.S. legally and violated no immigration laws.
... the administration hopes it becomes so commonplace that we hear about it, shake our heads in resigned hopelessness, and begin to accept it as inevitable. ...
Earlier in this piece, I noted that the creation of “domestic enemies” such as migrants permits the government to target not just the migrants themselves but the liberals and activists who support them as “enemies of the state.” The White House is now attempting to sow doubt and fear among its political opponents by using the power of the state to intimidate them and even lock them up, too....
This is why the fight for the rights of migrants, for basic concepts of justice and fair play, and for bedrock rights such as habeas corpus, matter so much. The cruelty the administration has unleashed upon one group is only a warm-up for something far more ambitious.
We can turn this back, force a reckoning, lock arms, and demand accountability. But the time to do so is now, rather than long after the detention camps they are building for migrants today become the prison camps for the perceived enemies of the state tomorrow.
, Rogan’s List
While the most urgent need is to prevent TPS designations from being terminated, we must also work for a more long-term, stable solution. Let’s contact our reps and ask them to condemn the revocation of TPS and which Rep. Sylvia Garcia (D-TX) has reintroduced to create a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers and folks with temporary status. ... We can also use to push Congress for a pathway to citizenship for all immigrants. Lastly, we can connect with and support , an organization formed and led by TPS beneficiaries that advocates to protect their status and for a legal path to permanent residency.
8June2025
, Rogan’s List
, and assaulted, injured and arrested David Huerta, the president of the SEIU in California. The raids sparked extensive protests. In spite of state and local officials and , Trump has chosen to and deploy them against our citizens. ... If we spot immigration enforcement activity, we can use these tips on how to verify and what information to record from and , and while enforcement is in progress.
.) And they’ve built a full guide to our rights we can read
. has pulled together multiple resources on how to protest safely
.
.
. connects military members with experienced attorneys and can be reached at .29June2025
The Trauma of ICE Raids in L.A., Rebecca Solnit
If you haven't been following news on what ICE is doing, there are many individual horror stories--a six-year-old with leukemia , incarcerated, and denied treatment when his mother brought him and his sibling to immigration court, a pregnant woman was a dead baby after being denied care while in custody, nursing mothers were arrested and taken away from their babies, a woman born in Iran who's been in the US for 47 years and has no criminal record by ICE while gardening in her home in suburban New Orleans, a US citizen who's Latino and a PhD candidate--and a US citizen-- at Claremont Graduate University was in a raid on a Home Depot in Hollywood. ... the L.A. Times notes, "Each roundup has inflicted very personal trauma to the , tearing families apart, inciting fear, taking away means to feed children and pay rent." Reports say that many families with immigrant and refugee members are afraid to leave their homes for any reason, which means in too many cases they can no longer work and are in financial freefall. ... Brandon Tauszik at Mother Jones reports ... , "But that framing—of conflagration and resistance—misses the more pervasive reality: the daily fear of simply living in LA under a constant threat from ICE. For many, it means sheltering in place—avoiding work, social life, or even a walk outside. What isn’t a risk under this administration?"
6July2025
, Antonia Scatton
The Trump budget is an abomination for many reasons, but what sickens me, is that it includes a wartime-level appropriation of $170B for masked police and concentration camps, ... The truth is that we have allowed millions of our immigrant neighbors to live in a state of exploitation and legal limbo, because we lack the political will to admit that we need them here and give them the rights and protections they deserve. ... We, the American people, have been keeping the dirty little secret that our country cannot function without a steady supply of immigrant workers, yet rather than admit this in public, we deprive these people of fundamental rights that all members of our society should have. They work. They pay taxes. They raise families. They start businesses. They should not have to live in perpetual legal limbo, let alone terror of abduction by secret police. ... Making the positive case for the role of immigration in our culture and economy is the right thing to do and the most powerful way to rob our opposition of the justification for their actions. We have to find the courage to do it. Our freedom depends on it.
, Robert Reich
Trump’s Big Ugly Bill delivers $170 billion for border and immigration enforcement. ... ICE will add 10,000 agents to the 20,000 already on the streets. ... Its annual budget for detentions will skyrocket from $3.4 billion in the current fiscal year to $45 billion until the end of the 2029 fiscal year. That’s a 365 percent increase. ... the number of people detained in ICE facilities — numbering as of June 15 — will likely grow dramatically. A four-fold increase in the detention budget could mean a quarter of a million people locked up. ... of ICE detainees have no criminal record. Some have been hardworking members of their communities for decades.
There are 65.2 million Latinos in the United States, the vast majority of whom are citizens. Inevitably, some American citizens will be swept up, arrested, and detained. As the number of raids on workers and families escalates, ICE agents will engage in more warrantless knocks on doors, searches, and arrests. ... This giant federal police effort will be supported by a supercharged surveillance system, also financed by Trump’s Big Ugly Bill. The Department of Homeland Security is joining with the Department of Government Efficiency to create the federal government’s first national citizenship data bank. ... Palantir corporation’s software will be used to combine data gleaned from the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Social Security Administration, and the Internal Revenue Service. Meanwhile, the administration wants access to citizens’ and others’ bank account numbers and medical claims.
The regime will not limit the purpose of its growing internal police apparatus to deporting undocumented people. Trump is already attacking the citizenship of people born in the United States to parents who may or may not have been citizens at the time of their birth — so-called “birthright citizenship.” The regime is also going after naturalized citizens (born outside the United States), using a McCarthy-era law that the Justice Department then used to sniff out former Nazis who lied their way into becoming American citizens — a law that allows the Department to “denaturalize,” or strip, someone’s citizenship. ... denaturalization should be aimed at anyone who may “pose a potential danger to national security” — a standard so vague as to allow the Department to expel people from the country based on unsubstantiated claims or even on their negative opinions about Trump.
The coming expansion of Trump’s police state under the Big Ugly Bill — featuring total surveillance, 10,000 ICE agents, and a network of detention facilities — will mark an escalation of Trump’s authoritarianism — using the pretext of an immigrant crime wave that does not exist. What you can do:
1. Protect the vulnerable. If anyone in your community is confronted by ICE agents demanding proof of citizenship, make sure they know they have a right to remain silent and to refuse consent to searches of their cars, homes, or persons. Red cards with this and other pertinent information are available in various languages. You can download and print them for free
.2. Make sure you know your own rights. If stopped, you are not required to answer questions. You can refuse a search of your person, car, or belongings. If the agents proceed with a search despite your refusal, make it clear you do not consent. If you’re not under arrest, you can ask if you are free to go. If the answer is yes, leave. If you or someone in your community believes rights have been violated, document everything you can of the encounter with ICE agents.
3. Finally, know that the purpose of Trump’s police state is to silence not just immigrants but the rest of us. Do not be intimidated or discouraged from speaking out, writing, demonstrating, boycotting, or undertaking any other nonviolent action in opposition to what the regime is doing. ... become even more active. Share any abuses you witness (and, ideally, have recorded on your phone) as widely as possible, so that more people are apprised of what’s happening and are ready to join the resistance. Be safe. Be careful. Have courage. Hug your loved ones.
13July2025
, Heather Cox Richardson
Trump appointees insist they have a “mandate” to drive undocumented immigrants out of the U.S. and prevent new immigrants from coming in, and are launching a massive increase in Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and detention facilities to do so. But a poll released Friday shows that only 35% of American adults approve of Trump’s handling of immigration, while 62% disapprove.
The poll shows a record 79% of adults saying immigration is good for the country, with only 17% seeing it as bad. Only 30% of American adults say immigration should be reduced. The poll shows that 85% of American adults want laws to allow “immigrants, who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children, the chance to become U.S. citizens if they meet certain requirements over a period of time.” Seventy-eight percent of American adults want the law to allow “immigrants living in the U.S. illegally the chance to become U.S. citizens if they meet certain requirements over a period of time.” Only 38% want the government to deport “all immigrants who are living in the United States illegally back to their home country.”
, Anat Shenker-Osorio
Trump and MAGA have escalated the pace and scope of their power grab – with particular cruelty inflicted on a long-favored target: immigrants. We must take care not to obscure MAGA’s crimes by referring to raids, abductions, and travel bans as “immigration policy.” “Immigration” is the movement of people into a country for purposes of residency. While the above actions do concern immigrants, they are not about immigration but rather the dehumanization, imprisonment, and harassment of human beings based on what they look like and where they come from. ... MAGA relies upon deliberately constructed, repeated refrains to lend normalcy, legitimacy and even righteousness to their actions. When we sanitize their actions or echo their refrains, for example, calling the Florida facility “Alligator Alcatraz,” we aid their cause. This is a concentration camp. It’s not merely accuracy at stake; naming this facility a “concentration camp” contextualizes this horrific new assault within a well-known fascist playbook. It decimates the anesthetizing fiction that “it could not happen here,” which impedes our ability to bring a wide array of actors into withdrawing consent for what is, in fact, happening. Policy for how to approach the border and rules around newcomers are areas of real debate in a democratic society; concentration camps are not. We must choose words that make clear to our audiences exactly what is at stake, exposing the motivations of the MAGA regime and generating the will to be in continuous opposition to it.
3August2025
, Economic Policy Institute
The number of deportations will skyrocket once the Trump administration fully rolls out its agenda. This will curtail business operations and reduce employer demand for immigrant and U.S.-born labor. If the administration follows through on its goals of deporting 4 million people over four years:
, Economic Policy Institute
Deporting the entire unauthorized immigrant population would require astronomical direct resources and costs, and even aside from the additional humanitarian concerns, it would disrupt and hurt the economy and the jobs situation in the United States. ... The best solution—and the only durable one—for the unauthorized immigrant population is for Congress to pass legislation that regularizes the status of unauthorized immigrants by allowing them to adjust to lawful permanent resident status (in other words, provide them with a path to citizenship) ...
30August2025
, James Greenberg Substack
The lesson is that authoritarian power thrives on fear and silence, shifting the burden onto those least able to resist. Once that principle is accepted, it can be extended to anyone. Repair begins when we refuse to live under managed uncertainty and demand that the rules protecting the least powerful protect everyone. Communities organize rapid-response networks, share knowledge of rights, and create trust where the state has sown suspicion. These small acts are the seeds of resilience. They remind us that belonging is not defined by government paperwork but by the networks of care people build for one another.
This is the fear we live with: that one day it will be someone we love who vanishes, taken without warning. The ruins are not only in the past. They are made every time a family is broken by disappearance. To confront that fear is to insist that belonging cannot be provisional, and that no one should be made to disappear in the only country they call home.
Ukraine / NATO / USAID / Militarism / Anti-Nuclear Weapons / Palestine
22June2025
, Robert Reich
Will the American public “rally ‘round the flag” and support Trump in this war?
Some Americans clearly will. But a drawn-out war in Iran will be deeply unpopular. A recent YouGov
found that only 16 percent of Americans thought the U.S. military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran; 60 percent said it should not. ... Trump promised no foreign entanglements and lower consumer prices. But this war could prove to be the largest foreign entanglement in years, and the attacks will almost certainly raise oil and gas prices.29June2025
Trump’s gutting of USAID—slashing 83% of its programs—could lead to over 14 million deaths by 2030, including 4.5 million children under 5. Cuts have halted clinics, food distribution, and access to HIV, malaria, and TB treatment in 133 countries. Marco Rubio claimed the programs didn’t serve U.S. “core interests.”
Trump’s abrupt dismantling of global aid will kill millions, destabilize regions, and cripple America’s moral standing. It’s a humanitarian catastrophe in the making.
Obama said “Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it’s a tragedy. Because it’s some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world ... sooner or later, leaders on both sides of the aisle will realize how much you are needed.” Bush ... went straight to the cuts in a landmark AIDS and HIV program started by his Republican administration and credited with saving 25 million lives around the world. “You’ve showed the great strength of America through your work – and that is your good heart,’’ Bush told USAID staffers “Is it in our national interests that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is, and so do you ...” Bono jokingly hailed the USAID staffers as “secret agents of international development ... They called you crooks. When you were the best of us ... ”
Voting Protections
22June2025
, Newsweek
A legal case questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election is moving forward. ... SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group, filed the lawsuit over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York.
They include where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate for Senate, but none voted for former Vice President , the Democratic candidate for president.
Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of the Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 results. ... The lawsuit is seeking a full, hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September 22.
3August2025
, If You Can Keep It Substack
A system that would end boundary-drawing brawls and make our democracy more effective, inclusive, and representative. I t’s called . ...: Share of votes equals share of seats. ... proportional representation opens the door for more politically viable , more coalition-building, and more cross-ideological allegiances. A more representative government with more incentives for compromise and could also mean a more responsive, effective government.
, Robert Hubbell Substack
But if Republicans have resorted to gerrymandering to destroy democracy, it is no vice to use gerrymandering to save democracy. Sadly, the Supreme Court has said that there is no federal bar to partisan gerrymandering. That is the world in which we live, and that is the world in which the battle for 2026 has been joined.
10August2025
Donald Trump and Texas Republicans are making an unprecedented power grab to steal congressional seats and rig the 2026 election before voting even begins. Other Republican states are following suit. They want to steal enough seats to control Congress regardless of how the people vote. If Californians don’t act now, Donald Trump will seize total power for two more years.
Food / Farms / Agriculture
13July2025
, The New Lede
“Agricultural operations across Iowa are a leading cause of significant water pollution problems in the state, posing dire risks to public and environmental health, according to that is sparking heated debate in the key US farm state. The 227-page “Central Iowa Source Water Research Assessment” (CISWRA) was formally released by Polk County, Iowa, officials on July 1 after months of what multiple sources said were intentional actions by public officials to suppress details of the report. The report caps a two-year-long research review by a team of 16 scientists that focused on pollution patterns in two “essential” rivers fed from a watershed running from southern Minnesota through the central part of Iowa to the state capital of Des Moines. Those rivers, the Des Moines and the Raccoon, are the primary source of drinking water for roughly 600,000 people and are considered important recreational state assets, but the rivers are commonly laden with harmful contaminants that include phosphorus and nitrogen, bacteria from animal and human waste, pesticides and other chemicals.” ... the report calls for the top US corn-growing state to diversify into production of crops that require fewer chemical inputs, and for limits on the density of livestock. ... Iowa has the second-highest rate of cancer in the nation .... Agricultural pollution is among the factors the high cancer rates. Separate from the water pollution study, the relationship between environmental risk factors and cancer rates is underway, led by the Iowa Environmental Council and the at Drake University.
The report makes a number of specific recommendations, including advancing regenerative agricultural practices, reducing pesticide use, better management of manure disposal, improved erosion control, and development of dual water delivery systems to increase the capacity of utilities to treat nitrate contamination in drinking water supplies. ... Larry Weber, another science advisor on the report ... said the findings of the report demonstrate that “we are on the verge of an environmental water quality disaster in this state.” ... he has little hope that the recommendations in the report will be followed, noting that Iowa lawmakers have cut funding for a monitoring network focused on reducing nutrient loss and water pollution. ... “Agriculture is such a dominant force,” he said. “I think industry and politics will prevail.”
, NYTimes
“More and more, people seemed to clamor for things that were unproven, to question things that were and to express not only mistrust but outright hostility toward the doctors, scientists and civil servants trying to separate one from the other. That hostility was being nourished by exactly the kind of mis- and disinformation Kennedy was espousing. It was easy to paint the F.D.A. as a supervillain (an aggressive suppressor of sunlight, vitamins and exercise, to borrow [RFK Jr’s language]), in part because the truth was so much more complex. ... Americans have always been ambivalent about public health in general and the American regulatory project in particular. We want protection from bad food and bad medicine and other unsafe products, but we also want to draw the line between safe and unsafe for ourselves and to redraw it whenever we see fit. The F.D.A. has always reflected this tension. On the one hand, the agency’s regulators have a truly enormous remit: Which drugs, medical devices, food, pet food, dietary supplements, tobacco products and cosmetics we can buy — one in every five dollars we spend ... comes down to the decisions they make. On the other hand, the agency itself is profoundly under-resourced.
The principles governing Kennedy’s Make America Healthy Again movement are simple: Conventional medicine has largely failed us, as rising rates of autism, obesity and chronic disease clearly demonstrate. And the profit-driven industries that hold such sway over our health cannot be trusted. Those who feel betrayed by our corporate health care system should be free to turn to the vast array of alternatives — adult stem-cell injections, dietary supplements, raw milk and testosterone therapy for men, to name a few — at their disposal. It’s true that many of these alternatives have not been tested or proved beneficial in the conventional, scientific way. But in a free society, personal choice should be paramount ... But that was exactly what the modern F.D.A. was created to do: prevent Americans from being swindled, or worse, by purveyors of ineffective medicine. .... It was clear to health officials that many of these products did not work, and that the very ill were especially vulnerable to scammers.
On March 27, a few days before the F.D.A.’s 27th commissioner, Martin Makary, was sworn in, Kennedy announced he would fire about 10,000 civil servants from the Department of Health and Human Services. The Food and Drug Administration would face heavy losses: in all, or 20 percent of its work force. ... The F.D.A.’s real problem ... was not so much industry capture as a fundamental weakness at the heart of the agency. In theory, its authority was ironclad. In practice, ... every interest group — from lawmakers to drug makers to doctors and patients — was president, and every judgment was a potential tipping point. This precariousness made agency officials deeply reluctant to admit mistakes or even to communicate openly. But that reluctance had costs of its own. ....It was easy to single out missteps, but the F.D.A. made hundreds of complex decisions every day, and each one came with benefits and trade-offs. The risk posed by a substandard factory, for example, had to be weighed against the prospect of major drug shortages, including of medications that treat cancer in children. And the downsides to approving a drug whose benefits appeared to be minimal had to be viewed in light of the patients who were facing certain death. Regulators like her did a pretty good job balancing those concerns, she insisted, especially relative to the resources at their disposal.
The F.D.A. was deeply imperfect. It was lumbering and often opaque, and it had gotten many things wrong in its long history. But the agency had also been built around a set of principles — scientific inquiry, impartial judgment, collective responsibility — that represented the best of what a functioning government could do for its people. Now it was being deliberately dismantled, and a generation’s worth of experience and expertise was being thrown away. ... As if that weren’t enough, the stewards of that legacy — the people who had worked long hours for low pay and faced constant criticism, all so that they might do what Frances Kelsey once did when she kept thalidomide off the market — were being treated like criminals. In Califf’s opinion, there was no good reason for any of it. “History will see this as a huge mistake,” he mused. “The F.D.A. as we’ve known it is finished.”
3August2025
, Project Drawdown
There isn’t a single silver bullet solution that addresses climate change in the food system. Vegan diets won’t solve it alone. Neither will regenerative agriculture or improved fertilizers. Instead we must use a whole portfolio of solutions and deploy them in tandem. Taken together, these solutions can address the problem – but only if we do them all and do them quickly. ... None of the solutions we need to take require new technology, trillions of dollars, or breaking the laws of physics. It’s all possible today. We have a chance to build an entirely better food system. One that restores nature instead of destroying it and addresses climate change instead of accelerating it. Together, we can create a food system that nourishes the world today and far into the future.
Gender Equality / LGBTQ+
*Complete if you would like to join a Basecamp Action Group and contribute to these Collective Insights.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.