Explore

Technical Overview

This section provides a high-level technical description of ClearTrace. It is intended to support understanding, evaluation, and integration without requiring deep familiarity with the underlying stack or implementation details.

ClearTrace is designed as a modular, auditable, and secure system that encodes governance constraints directly into its architecture.

⁠

System Architecture

ClearTrace is structured around a layered architecture that separates data intake, verification, analysis, and publication.

At a high level, the system includes:

Application Layer: User interfaces for contributors, reviewers, legal reviewers, and administrators. These interfaces are role-aware and expose only permitted actions and views.

Governance & Workflow Layer: Moderation queues, verification workflows, scoring logic, guardrail decision processes, and policy generation. This layer ensures that no data moves directly from submission to publication without review.

Data & Evidence Layer: Structured storage for cases, evidence, testimonies, legal filings, scores, and decisions. Evidence items are immutable once verified.

Security & Audit Layer

Role-based access control, row-level security, audit logs, cryptographic hashing, and consent enforcement.

Federation & Integration Layer: Optional synchronization mechanisms for sharing selected data across aligned instances.

The architecture is designed to support independent deployment, federation, and future extensibility.

⁠

Data Models (High-Level)

ClearTrace uses structured data models to ensure traceability and auditability.

Core conceptual models include:

Entity — organizations or institutions under review

Case — a container for related evidence and analysis

Evidence Item — documents, records, or references supporting a case

Testimony — protected, consent-aware experiential submissions

Legal Proceeding — court cases, filings, and regulatory actions

Score & Indicator — structured assessments of risk and impact

Guardrail Decision — engagement boundary outcomes

Policy Output — generated governance or engagement policies

Relationships between models are explicitly defined to support pattern mapping, cross-referencing, and review.

⁠

Security & Row-Level Security (RLS)

Security in ClearTrace is defensive by design.

Key protections include:

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Distinct permissions for public users, contributors, reviewers, legal reviewers, and administrators.

Row-Level Security (RLS): Fine-grained access rules ensuring that:

draft or unverified data remains restricted

sensitive testimony is visible only to authorized reviewers

public views expose only verified, approved information

Audit Logging: All actions affecting data state are recorded and reviewable.

Evidence Integrity: Evidence files are hashed and timestamped at intake to prevent tampering.

Consent Enforcement: Consent and anonymity settings are enforced at the data layer, not just the interface.

⁠

Open-Source Philosophy

ClearTrace is developed as an open-source system to promote transparency, trust, and collective stewardship.

The open-source approach enables:

independent review of governance logic

local adaptation without vendor lock-in

federated innovation across aligned communities

long-term sustainability beyond any single organization

Open-source does not imply ungoverned use. Governance constraints, evidence standards, and consent requirements remain integral to the system regardless of deployment context.

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.

Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (

CtrlP

) instead.