In the Holonic Dashboard, the architecture is designed to reflect multiscale coordination and relational integrity—so here’s how this scenario would be structured:
🔹 Unified Instance with Nested Holonic Views
Rather than each group needing a fully separate instance, a single unified instance of the Holonic Dashboard would serve as the coordination layer for the shared initiative, with each organization, network, or DAO instantiated as a nested holon within that shared operating space.
Here's how it would be structured:
1. Top-Level Shared Initiative (Unified Instance)
This is the umbrella holon for the one-year collaboration. It defines:
Cross-organizational proposals System-wide feedback loops Unified reporting and analytics 2. Nested Holons: Each Organization
Each participating entity (centralized org, decentralized network, DAO) becomes a sub-holon within this shared holonic structure. Each:
Retains its own roles, permissions, and workflows Can view and manage its own modules (e.g. finances, tasks, governance) Participates in cross-holon modules (e.g. joint proposals, co-budgeting, cross-network task boards) 3. Shared vs. Local Modules
Shared Modules include cross-holon decision-making, project timelines, value flow tracking, and communications. Local Modules let each holon run its internal ops autonomously (e.g. one org’s treasury or DAO’s proposals). 4. Access & Visibility
Access is permissioned by role and scope:
An individual can be a member of one holon and a contributor to another Dashboards are filtered based on holonic scope, but always contextualized within the unified frame of the shared initiative ✅ Summary:
One unified instance for shared initiatives Each org/network/DAO is a holon, not a separate system Shared intelligence layer allows transparency, accountability, and aligned decision-making Modular integration preserves autonomy while enabling collective coherence Would you like a diagram or breakdown of how this could look in the UI?