Controlled Fork & Divergence Protocol
(Governance-Level Schism & Continuity Specification)
I. Purpose
The Controlled Fork & Divergence Protocol defines the formal conditions under which a governance instance may:
Split into one or more derivative instances Preserve historical traceability Prevent destructive fragmentation Protect minority exit rights Maintain federation integrity A fork is defined as a structured divergence event, not a governance failure.
II. Fork Classification
Three fork types are formally recognized:
1. Soft Fork (Parametric Divergence)
Governance parameters change Constitutional invariants remain intact Ledger continuity preserved Asset ownership unaffected Use case:
This is essentially a major governance amendment.
2. Constitutional Fork (Structural Divergence)
Foundational invariants modified Governance grammar changes Role authority distribution altered Threshold logic modified beyond compatibility bounds Requires:
Explicit supermajority trigger Federation compatibility re-validation Ledger remains traceable but marked as divergence event.
3. Schism Fork (Instance Replication & Separation)
New governance instance instantiated Members opt-in to derivative instance Influence balances recalculated Federation credentials reset or inherited conditionally This is full divergence.
III. Fork Trigger Conditions
A fork may be triggered by:
(e.g., 25–40% sustained dissent over X resolution cycles) Constitutional Amendment Failure (supermajority threshold not met but minority sustained) (automated risk index breach) Fork initiation must pass:
Minimum participation density Minimum deliberation window IV. Asset Partition Logic
For Schism Forks only.
Partition options must be declared prior to execution:
Based on influence weight or equity contribution Based on recorded capital and labor contribution history Voluntary Asset Reassignment Members opt to transfer stake into derivative entity Clean governance replication with no asset transfer Asset transfer must:
Preserve ledger traceability Prevent double-spend of governance units Maintain audit continuity V. Membership Migration
Members may:
Remain in parent instance Participate in both (if permitted by constitutional rules) Influence Currency must:
Recalculate independently per instance Remove delegation bindings unless explicitly re-authorized VI. Ledger Continuity & Provenance
All forks must:
Preserve parent ledger hash reference Mark divergence timestamp Maintain immutable audit trail of pre-fork governance history Post-fork:
New ledger root established Cross-instance actions prohibited unless federated This prevents historical erasure.
VII. Federation Integrity
Upon Schism Fork:
Federation compatibility must be re-evaluated Federation credentials either: Be revoked automatically pending review This prevents unstable instances from destabilizing network governance.
VIII. Anti-Abuse Safeguards
To prevent malicious fragmentation:
Minimum cooling-off period before fork execution Maximum fork frequency per cycle Asset freeze window during partition process Mandatory impact disclosure statement IX. Divergence Transparency
Every fork event must publicly record:
Governance parameter delta Federation status outcome Fork opacity is prohibited.
X. Governance Lineage Tree
Every instance must maintain:
Compatibility classification