Skip to content

CoGov CFA Correlation

What Is Covered by the Institutional Governance Framework

1. Vision / Mission

Covered by:
Cultural Orientation (Purpose, Declaration, Mission Scope)
Constitution (Article I — Purpose & Jurisdiction)
These define institutional purpose, domain, and stewardship orientation.

2. Councils / Authority Bodies

Covered by:
Governance Model (authority distribution philosophy)
Constitution (Article II — Sovereign Authority Structure)
Operations (Role Architecture)
These define authority tiers, delegation pathways, and operational role structures.

3. Influence Currency / Current-Sees

Covered by:
Operations (Incentive Systems)
Semantic Standards (entity definitions and value classification schema)
Distributed Technical Architecture (permission model and token registry)
These domains define contribution measurement, reward logic, and technical recording systems.

4. Mission Metrics

Covered by:
Intelligence & Monitoring
Includes:
Participation density metrics
Governance throughput indicators
Authority concentration monitoring
Institutional health indices
Structural review triggers

5. Assets / Real-World Holdings

Covered by:
Constitution (Article V — Treasury & Commons Stewardship)
Operations (Treasury Governance)
Distributed Technical Architecture (custody systems and financial registry integration)
These domains govern capital custody, allocation procedures, and asset transparency.

6. Proposal Initiation / Iteration / Resolution

Covered by:
Constitution (Article III — Governance Process Architecture)
Operations (Decision Systems)
Semantic Standards (proposal metadata and lifecycle schema)
Together these define proposal eligibility, quorum rules, approval thresholds, and execution pathways.

7. Jurisdiction / Dispute Resolution

Covered by:
Constitution (Article VII — Dispute Resolution & Due Process)
Operations (Dispute Pathways)
Institutional Entity Formation (legal wrapper interface)
These define complaint procedures, review authority, due process structure, and final decision authority.

8. Team Accountabilities

Covered by:
Operations (Role Registry, Appointment, Removal, Term Limits)
Governance Model (leadership expectations and authority posture)
Constitution (Role & Mandate Architecture)
These domains define accountability structures and role authority constraints.

9. Operational Notes / Institutional Procedures

Covered by:
Operations (Operational Governance Systems)
Intelligence & Monitoring (participation thresholds and review triggers)
Distributed Technical Architecture (execution logic and infrastructure integration)
These domains define how institutional systems operate under real conditions.

10. Participation Attestations

Covered by:
Operations (Participation Attestations)
Unifying Source Agreement (Foundational Participation Covenant)
Semantic Standards (attestation registry schema)
These mechanisms confirm that participants have acknowledged institutional requirements prior to activating governance rights or operational roles.
Attestations govern:
Membership activation
Role acceptance
Proposal submission eligibility
Treasury authority activation
Governance participation eligibility
Attestation records create auditable confirmation that participants understand and accept institutional commitments.

What Remains Partially Outside the Framework

1. Ritual or Ceremonial Ratification

The Institutional Governance Framework now includes formal participation covenants and attestations, but it does not prescribe ceremonial or symbolic ratification procedures.
Examples that remain optional rather than structural:
Ritual invocation language
Ceremonial oath structures
Symbolic affirmation protocols
These could optionally appear in:
Cultural Orientation (as a cultural practice)
Adoption procedures within the Constitution
However, they are not required for governance validity.

2. Formation Witnesses / External Facilitators

The framework supports role definitions but does not explicitly require:
Named formation witnesses
Covenant co-signers
External facilitators
These could be defined under:
Institutional Entity Formation
Constitution (Adoption & Ratification provisions)

3. Initial Influence Allocation Logic

The framework supports incentive systems and value tracking but may require additional specification for:
Initial influence distribution
Dynamic allocation algorithms
Revocation or decay mechanisms
These would be implemented within the Operations Incentive Systems domain.

Structural Verdict (Updated)

The Institutional Governance Framework now fully replaces and significantly expands the structural mechanics of the CFA template.
The framework explicitly defines:
Authority allocation
Constitutional governance structure
Operational governance execution
Participation activation through attestations
Treasury custody and controls
Dispute resolution
Monitoring and governance health metrics
Semantic interoperability
Federation readiness
The CFA template emphasized symbolic covenant framing and narrative alignment. Those elements now exist in the framework primarily through:
Cultural Orientation
The Unifying Source Agreement
Participation Attestation mechanisms

Conclusion

The Institutional Governance Framework now captures both:
Structural institutional mechanics
Participation commitment mechanisms
It therefore covers the operational and governance functions previously addressed by the CFA template while providing a more explicit architecture for distributed institutional design, constitutional authority, and operational execution.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.