What Is Covered by the Institutional Governance Framework
1. Vision / Mission
Covered by:
Cultural Orientation (Purpose, Declaration, Mission Scope) Constitution (Article I — Purpose & Jurisdiction) These define institutional purpose, domain, and stewardship orientation.
2. Councils / Authority Bodies
Covered by:
Governance Model (authority distribution philosophy) Constitution (Article II — Sovereign Authority Structure) Operations (Role Architecture) These define authority tiers, delegation pathways, and operational role structures.
3. Influence Currency / Current-Sees
Covered by:
Operations (Incentive Systems) Semantic Standards (entity definitions and value classification schema) Distributed Technical Architecture (permission model and token registry) These domains define contribution measurement, reward logic, and technical recording systems.
4. Mission Metrics
Covered by:
Intelligence & Monitoring Includes:
Participation density metrics Governance throughput indicators Authority concentration monitoring Institutional health indices Structural review triggers 5. Assets / Real-World Holdings
Covered by:
Constitution (Article V — Treasury & Commons Stewardship) Operations (Treasury Governance) Distributed Technical Architecture (custody systems and financial registry integration) These domains govern capital custody, allocation procedures, and asset transparency.
6. Proposal Initiation / Iteration / Resolution
Covered by:
Constitution (Article III — Governance Process Architecture) Operations (Decision Systems) Semantic Standards (proposal metadata and lifecycle schema) Together these define proposal eligibility, quorum rules, approval thresholds, and execution pathways.
7. Jurisdiction / Dispute Resolution
Covered by:
Constitution (Article VII — Dispute Resolution & Due Process) Operations (Dispute Pathways) Institutional Entity Formation (legal wrapper interface) These define complaint procedures, review authority, due process structure, and final decision authority.
8. Team Accountabilities
Covered by:
Operations (Role Registry, Appointment, Removal, Term Limits) Governance Model (leadership expectations and authority posture) Constitution (Role & Mandate Architecture) These domains define accountability structures and role authority constraints.
9. Operational Notes / Institutional Procedures
Covered by:
Operations (Operational Governance Systems) Intelligence & Monitoring (participation thresholds and review triggers) Distributed Technical Architecture (execution logic and infrastructure integration) These domains define how institutional systems operate under real conditions.
10. Participation Attestations
Covered by:
Operations (Participation Attestations) Unifying Source Agreement (Foundational Participation Covenant) Semantic Standards (attestation registry schema) These mechanisms confirm that participants have acknowledged institutional requirements prior to activating governance rights or operational roles.
Attestations govern:
Proposal submission eligibility Treasury authority activation Governance participation eligibility Attestation records create auditable confirmation that participants understand and accept institutional commitments.
What Remains Partially Outside the Framework
1. Ritual or Ceremonial Ratification
The Institutional Governance Framework now includes formal participation covenants and attestations, but it does not prescribe ceremonial or symbolic ratification procedures.
Examples that remain optional rather than structural:
Ritual invocation language Ceremonial oath structures Symbolic affirmation protocols These could optionally appear in:
Cultural Orientation (as a cultural practice) Adoption procedures within the Constitution However, they are not required for governance validity.
2. Formation Witnesses / External Facilitators
The framework supports role definitions but does not explicitly require:
Named formation witnesses These could be defined under:
Institutional Entity Formation Constitution (Adoption & Ratification provisions) 3. Initial Influence Allocation Logic
The framework supports incentive systems and value tracking but may require additional specification for:
Initial influence distribution Dynamic allocation algorithms Revocation or decay mechanisms These would be implemented within the Operations Incentive Systems domain.
Structural Verdict (Updated)
The Institutional Governance Framework now fully replaces and significantly expands the structural mechanics of the CFA template.
The framework explicitly defines:
Constitutional governance structure Operational governance execution Participation activation through attestations Treasury custody and controls Monitoring and governance health metrics Semantic interoperability The CFA template emphasized symbolic covenant framing and narrative alignment. Those elements now exist in the framework primarily through:
The Unifying Source Agreement Participation Attestation mechanisms Conclusion
The Institutional Governance Framework now captures both:
Structural institutional mechanics Participation commitment mechanisms It therefore covers the operational and governance functions previously addressed by the CFA template while providing a more explicit architecture for distributed institutional design, constitutional authority, and operational execution.