Skip to content

ArcGIS Pro - Thermal Imagery - Sept. 30th, 2025

Overview

This Doak Burn flight was conducted on September 19th, 2019 and was capturing thermal imagery of a controlled burn. Leaning these light wavelengths (Fig. #1) was really helpful in the understanding of how to interpret the information displayed post processing. Some of the other processed imagery displays the importance of each band and what kind of effect it has visually when reduced or intensified. Attached below are thermal imagery with detailed descriptions characterizing the images and will come in handy for application in the future. This can be future internships, jobs, or even classes that involve different levels of thermal scanning.
image.png
Fig. #1: Micasense RedEdge Peak Band Reflectance
Blue: 480nm ​Green: 555nm ​Red: 660nm ​Red Edge: 720nm ​NIR: 835nm

Fig. #2: LWIR Band

Brightest reflectance would be the paths with bare dirt. Lowest reflectance would be trees and the denser they are the darker they appear. Some features that jump out are maybe some shadows from trees. Band sensing identifying a specific band of color and homing in on that specific one. This differs from NIR because it’s more specific in what it’s trying to identify.
Screenshot 2025-11-02 191545.png
Fig. #2: LWIR Band

Fig. #3: Red Band

Brightest reflectance would be bare soil on paths and in fields that have very little ground cover. Lowest reflectance would be trees and the dense patches of vegetation. Some features that jump out are definitely the paths and the outlines fields with patches that are splotchy.
Screenshot 2025-11-02 191508.png
Fig. #3: Red Band

Fig. #4: LWIR Band

Brightest reflectance would be the fields that were burned and they show up very prevalent. Lowest reflectance would be trees and short brush that are healthy and don’t have that rush of immediate thermal radiation. Some features that jump out are definitely the fields because everything else is pretty much black.
Screenshot 2025-11-02 191554.png
Fig. #4: LWIR Band

Fig. #5: False IR Band & NDVI Band

The shows the post burn effects of the human impact on these fields resulting from a controlled burn. As depicted from the imagery, green indicates burned fields, yellow shows standing plants, and red displays healthy plants. Understanding the identity of the colors assists in the deeper understanding of how to conclude the effects on a specific event.
Screenshot 2025-11-02 190601.png
Fig. #5: False IR Band & NDVI Band

Fig. #6: False IR Band & NDVI Band

The shows the preburn effects of the human impact on these fields resulting from a controlled burn. As depicted from the imagery, green indicates dead plants, yellow shows standing plants, and red displays healthy plants. As explained previously, understanding the identity of the colors assists in the deeper understanding of how to conclude the effects on a specific event.
Screenshot 2025-11-02 190922.png
Fig. #6: False IR Band & NDVI Band

Fig. #7: False IR Band with adjusted band designations

This is a post burn analysis of the same area but with adjusted band designations. This changes the visible bands that display different characteristics to hopefully allow for future comprehension of the scan. As shown, the red band shows dead plants and bare soil show up most prevalently, green shows healthy plants with lots of leaves, and then blue is fields and some outlines of paths. This was a fun experiment to change the bands to adjust the visual display of the data, and this will be very beneficial in the future for future research.
Screenshot 2025-11-02 191209.png
Fig. #7: False IR Band with adjusted band designations





Load content from 1drv.ms?
Loading external content may reveal information to 3rd parties. Learn more
Allow
Load content from python-seabreeze.readthedocs.io?
Loading external content may reveal information to 3rd parties. Learn more
Allow
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.