Skip to content
Clarity of Thought: Does the candidate approach the problem systematically (clarifying inputs, outputs, constraints)?Correctness: Does the solution work for the given requirements and edge cases?Efficiency: Does the candidate consider time and space complexity?Code Quality: Is the solution readable, maintainable, and structured?Debugging Ability: Can the candidate identify and fix mistakes under pressure?Communication: Does the candidate explain their reasoning while coding?
Break problems into steps before coding (state assumptions, inputs, outputs).Think aloud to demonstrate reasoning.Consider edge cases (empty inputs, negative values, large datasets).Write code with clarity (variable names, modular functions).Discuss trade-offs between multiple solutions.Reflect on “What would I improve with more time?”
Implement a function to check if a string has balanced parentheses.Find the first non-repeated character in a string.Merge two sorted arrays into one sorted array.Given a buggy piece of code, identify the issues and propose a fix.Write a function to calculate factorial iteratively and recursively.Optimize a function that removes duplicates from an array.“Imagine you’re working with a dataset of millions of records—how would you search efficiently?”“How would you handle a situation where your code works locally but fails in production?”
Start with a warm-up coding question (low-barrier) to reduce stress.Observe the process as much as the final code.Use consistent scoring rubrics (avoid bias towards clever but unreadable code).Encourage candidates to verbalize decisions.Practice solving problems on a whiteboard or shared doc—don’t rely only on IDE autocompletion.Explain why you choose one approach over another.After solving, do a self-review:“Are my variable names clear?”“What are possible edge cases?”“How would this scale?”
For Interviewers:“Did I give space for the candidate to think aloud?”“Did I evaluate based on structured criteria or gut feeling?”For Candidates:“Did I communicate my reasoning clearly?”“Did I test edge cases, not just the happy path?”“Did I demonstrate efficiency and clarity?”
Clarity of requirements (Do you ask the right clarifying questions?)Structured thinking (Can you break the system into components?)Trade-off awareness (Do you mention latency vs. throughput, cost vs. performance?)Communication (Do you explain diagrams in simple words?)“How would you design a URL shortener like Bitly?”“What considerations go into building a payment system?”Always start by clarifying requirements. Don’t rush.Use a whiteboard or paper — visuals help both you and your interviewer.Talk about trade-offs explicitly: “We could choose X for speed, but Y if we want cost savings.”Don’t expect a perfect design. Look for structured thinking.Probe gently: “What if traffic increases by 100x?”Avoid nitpicking minor details — focus on reasoning process.
Identifies brute force, then improves.Balances time vs. space complexity.Writes clean, testable code.Explains reasoning as they go.“Given a list of numbers, find the longest increasing subsequence.”Don’t panic if you don’t know the optimal solution right away. Start with something simple.Narrate your thinking process — silence makes it harder for the interviewer to help.Practice coding on a whiteboard or in plain text (simulate the interview environment).Look for problem-solving approach, not just the final answer.Ask: “How would this scale if input doubled?”If candidate gets stuck, offer a small hint to see how they use it.
Identifies assumptions and verifies them.Uses structured methods (divide and conquer, logging, test cases).Writes clean, maintainable fixes (not hacks).You’re given a broken function. Find and fix the bug.State your debugging strategy out loud.Don’t guess randomly — show systematic elimination.Write down assumptions and test them.Don’t over-focus on “speed of fix.” Value the process.Notice how they communicate: calm vs. panic.
Uses structure (context → problem → solution).Avoids jargon when unnecessary.Checks for understanding.Before answering, pause to structure. “Let me break it down in three steps.”Practice storytelling: use the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result).Listen as much as you talk.Encourage nervous candidates: “Take your time.”Pay attention not only to content, but tone and clarity.
Shares credit, not just personal wins.Listens actively.Handles disagreements constructively.Tell stories of team challenges and how you helped resolve them.Show empathy — mention how you supported teammates.Ask: “Tell me about a time you had a conflict in a team.”Watch for blame vs. responsibility-taking.
Takes responsibility, not excuses.Thinks beyond immediate task.Mentors others when possible.Share examples where you took initiative.Be honest about failures — but show how you learned.Ask: “Tell me about a time you owned a project end-to-end.”Look for initiative, not arrogance.
Shows curiosity.Admits “I don’t know” and learns fast.Reflects on past mistakes with humility.Share a time you struggled with new tech but figured it out.Show you can self-learn (online courses, side projects).Ask: “Tell me about a time you learned something quickly.”Value mindset over perfection.
Resonates with company values (collaboration, innovation, integrity).Shows respect for diverse teams.Demonstrates adaptability to company mission.Research company values before the interview.Share why they matter to you.Avoid bias (don’t look for “just like us”).Look for alignment, not uniformity.
Ask clarifying questions.Manage time during interviews.Handle stress gracefully.Structure interviews consistently.Give fair, bias-aware evaluations.Create a safe environment.
Warm-upClarify role2–3 core competenciesFeedback & reflectionMy strengthsMy growth areasMy story (STAR method)My questions for interviewers
Interview Excellence Playbook – Draft v1
Preface: Why This Playbook Exists
Every engineer has faced that moment. Sitting in front of an interviewer, palms sweaty, heart racing, wondering: “Will I mess up this question?” On the other side of the table, every interviewer has also thought: “Am I really asking the right questions to see this person’s true potential?”
This playbook is born from those moments.
It’s not just about acing interviews. It’s about building a career, unlocking confidence, and learning how to evaluate and be evaluated fairly.
If you’re a candidate — this book helps you prepare, practice, and shine.
If you’re an interviewer — this book helps you ask better, listen deeper, and select with clarity.
And if you’re both (as many of us are, at different times) — you’ll discover how the skills overlap. After all, interview excellence is career excellence.
Chapter 1: Problem-Solving & Coding
🎯 Why This Matters
Problem-solving and coding are at the heart of software engineering. Beyond writing code, strong engineers demonstrate structured thinking, creativity, efficiency, and the ability to break down complex problems into smaller steps.
A great coding interview is not about remembering syntax—it’s about how candidates think. At the same time, interviewers must ensure that evaluation criteria are clear, consistent, and fair.
🧑💻 What Interviewers Should Look For
🎓 What Candidates Should Practice
✅ Scoring Rubric (Problem-Solving & Coding)
Table 2
Level
Indicators
1 – Basic
Can write some working code but misses edge cases, lacks structure, inefficient approach. Thinks silently, unclear explanations.
2 – Developing
Breaks problem into steps, produces correct solution for standard cases, explains thought process. Some inefficiency or unclear code remains.
3 – Proficient
Writes correct, clean, and efficient code with good naming and modularity. Handles edge cases, explains trade-offs clearly.
4 – Advanced
Optimizes beyond obvious solutions, balances clarity and performance, anticipates scaling issues. Communicates like a peer collaborator.
There are no rows in this table
💡 Sample Questions (from Competency Bank – mapped)
Algorithms & Data Structures
Problem-Solving & Debugging
Applied Scenarios
🛠️ Interview Exercises
For Interviewers
For Candidates
🔄 Reflection Prompts
Chapter 2: System Design & Architecture
When you reach mid to senior levels, it’s no longer just about writing code. It’s about designing systems that scale, survive, and serve.
Why it matters:
System design interviews simulate real-world thinking: trade-offs, scalability, maintainability. They reveal how you balance constraints under pressure.
What great looks like:
Sample questions (from your bank):
Tips for candidates:
Tips for interviewers:
Reflection Prompt:
When was the last time you had to make a system design decision under unclear requirements? How did you handle it?
Chapter 3: Algorithms & Data Structures
These interviews test your foundation. They may feel like puzzles, but they’re also about clarity under pressure.
Why it matters:
Strong knowledge of algorithms shows you can think critically and solve efficiently.
What great looks like:
Sample question:
Candidate Tips:
Interviewer Tips:
Chapter 4: Debugging & Code Quality
Debugging is underrated. But in reality, this is what engineers spend half their lives doing.
Why it matters:
Good debugging shows critical thinking, resilience, and systematic approaches.
What great looks like:
Sample exercise:
Candidate Tips:
Interviewer Tips:
Chapter 5: Communication & Storytelling
Brilliant engineers fail interviews not because of skill — but because they can’t explain clearly.
Why it matters:
Communication isn’t just about words. It’s about building understanding, confidence, and trust.
What great looks like:
Candidate Tips:
Interviewer Tips:
Chapter 6: Collaboration & Teamwork
Interviews aren’t just about “me.” They’re about how “me” fits into “we.”
Why it matters:
Software is built in teams. Great collaboration means fewer conflicts and more impact.
What great looks like:
Candidate Tips:
Interviewer Tips:
Chapter 7: Leadership & Ownership
Leadership is not about title — it’s about behavior. Even juniors can show ownership.
Why it matters:
Ownership is the strongest predictor of long-term success.
What great looks like:
Candidate Tips:
Interviewer Tips:
Chapter 8: Growth Mindset & Learning Agility
Tech changes fast. The best engineers are the best learners.
Why it matters:
Hiring for today’s skills is fine. Hiring for tomorrow’s adaptability is smarter.
What great looks like:
Candidate Tips:
Interviewer Tips:
Chapter 9: Cultural Fit & Values Alignment
Skills can be trained. Values? Much harder.
Why it matters:
Culture fit isn’t about being the same — it’s about alignment in how we work.
What great looks like:
Candidate Tips:
Interviewer Tips:
Chapter 10: Interview Meta-Skills
This chapter is special: it’s about how to interview well, as a candidate and as an interviewer.
Why it matters:
Meta-skills are the “interview about interviews.” They are the glue.
Candidate Meta-Skills:
Interviewer Meta-Skills:
Reflection Prompt:
Next time you interview, ask yourself: Did I create clarity or confusion?
Appendices
A1. Rubrics by Competency
(Tables of scoring: 1 = weak, 5 = strong, for each competency like problem solving, teamwork, etc.)
A2. Scoring Sheet Template
Table 1
Candidate
Competency
Score
Notes
There are no rows in this table
A3. Question Bank Extract
// TODO to fill or link with a question banks
A4. Mock Interview Flow Checklist
A5. Candidate Self-Prep Worksheet
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.