Skip to content
Gallery
Lockwood Blueprint
Atlas Carbon Timeline
Goals & Actions
Blueprint Dashboard
Analysis Results
Photo Storage - Lockwood
More
Share
Explore
Analysis Results

icon picker
Pasture Analysis

Pasture samples were taken to gain insight into the variation in feed quality attributes and mineral content, which it must be remembered are a snapshot at a point time, since these values will change through the year. Recall also, the samples were taken to be representative of how the intended livestock would graze, not a full pasture cut from ground up.
Feed Metrics... what we tested and why
⁠
⁠

⁠
image.png
⁠
⁠
Road
⁠
image.png
⁠
⁠
River paddock

⁠
image.png
⁠
⁠

Bobs East
⁠

Feed Quality Results
Sample Site
Road 1
River 1
Bobs West
River 3
Desired
Notes
1
Energy - ME (MJ/kg)
8.1
9.1
8.6
7.2
>8
Plant energy reflects the combination of soil nutrition, grazing and species desirability.
2
Crude Protein%
4.9
7.7
10.0
8.0
> 15
Low protein (<18%) suggests legume component can be improved and quality is below optimal
3
Digestibility (DMD) (%)
57
62
59
51
> 60
Below 55% will likely reduce animal performance (ADG), above 60% is good quality feed
4
Neutral Detergent Fibre% (NDF)
61
60
53
63
<50
Higher plant fibre reduces total animal intake and associated performance, below 60 preferred
There are no rows in this table
⁠

Feed Mineral Levels
Sample Site
Road 1
River 1
Bobs West
River 3
Desired
Comments
1
Nitrogen %
0.74
1.26
1.56
1.20
> 3%
Nitrogen & Sulphur drive plant protein
2
Calcium %
0.36
0.18
0.37
0.26
> 0.6
Calcium drives weight gain & feed quality
3
Phosphorus %
0.26
0.12
0.25
0.19
> 0.3
P drives plant energy (ME) above
4
Sulphur %
0.15
0.14
0.23
0.11
> 0.35
N&S are critical to Protein production
5
Potassium %
1.25
1.51
1.52
1.37
2-3%
​
6
Magnesium %
0.12
0.11
0.21
0.18
> 0.25%
Low Magnesium often leads to grass tetany and staggers
7
Sodium%
0.23
0.42
0.12
0.35
​
8
Trace elements
​
9
Zinc ppm
34
19
14
26
> 40
​
10
Copper ppm
3
4
4
4
> 10
​
11
Molybdenum (mg/kg)
<0.50
<0.50
0.7
<0.50
> 0.5
​
12
Ratios:
​
13
Ca:P Ratio
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.5:1
​
14
Nitrogen : Sulphur
5.0
9.3
6.8
10.6
10-20
​
15
Ca:Mg Ratio
3.0
1.6
1.8
1.4
3:1
​
There are no rows in this table
⁠
⁠
image.png
⁠
⁠
All samples show LOW P in both Soil and Feed test results. Soil P needs to be higher to achieve higher P% in feed which generally transfers into feed quality as metabolisable energy (ME)

⁠
image.png
⁠
⁠
All samples show lower than desired metabolisable energy (ME) in the forage and P is marginal

Summary

PRIORITIES for Feed Results
⁠
⁠
Sample Notes
⁠

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.