Skip to content
Claude summary of options
Claude summary of options
Platform
Unified Search
AI-Driven Organization
Zettelkasten-Style Linking
Mind Mapping
Temptations
Reservations
Obsidian
Partial - Strong internal search, but limited cross-platform capabilities
Limited - Relies on plugins like Smart Connections
Yes - Strong support for bidirectional linking
Yes - Graph view for visualizing connections
Alex: Powerful and flexible. GPT: Extensive plugin ecosystem, local storage for privacy
Alex: "I've been using it for 2 months and I still don't really get it or find it intuitive." Concerns about spending too much time customizing
Tana
No - Limited to internal search
Moderate - Some AI features, but not as advanced as dedicated AI tools
Yes - Node-based structure supports Zettelkasten principles
Partial - Hierarchical views but no true mind mapping
Alex: "That is kind of what I like about Tana over Obsidian." GPT: Flexible, node-based organization
Alex: Lack of integration and API. GPT: No mobile app, limited AI capabilities
Limited - Strong internal search, weak cross-platform
Yes - Strong AI-driven organization and tagging
Partial - Supports linking but not designed for Zettelkasten
Limited - Basic visualization features
GPT: Powerful AI for automatic organization and surfacing relevant information
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Limited Zettelkasten-style linking, weak visualization
Reflect
Limited - Focused on internal content
Moderate - Some AI-driven contextual organization
Yes - Designed for bidirectional linking
Limited - Minimal visualization features
GPT: Simplicity and focus on daily notes
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Limited customization options
Capacities
Limited - No cross-platform search
Yes - AI-driven linking and tagging
Yes - Strong support for Zettelkasten-style linking
Yes - Visual graph views
GPT: Blend of AI-driven organization and strong linking capabilities
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Limited integration options
Notion
No - Limited to internal search
Limited - Some AI features but not core functionality
Partial - Supports linking but not optimized for Zettelkasten
Limited - Can create basic mind maps
Alex: "Notion seems totally pointless to me." GPT: Flexible, good for collaborative work
Alex: Didn't see the point. GPT: Can be slow with large databases, limited offline functionality
Roam Research
No - Focused on internal linking
Limited - Not a core feature
Yes - Pioneered modern implementation of Zettelkasten in digital tools
Yes - Offers graph view
GPT: Excellent for networked thought and daily notes
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Steep learning curve, subscription cost
Logseq
No - Limited to internal content
Limited - Not a core feature
Yes - Strong support for bidirectional linking
Yes - Includes graph view
GPT: Open-source, privacy-focused, similar to Roam but free
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Less polished UI, steeper learning curve
Athens Research
No - Focused on internal content
Limited - Not a core feature
Yes - Designed for networked thought
Yes - Includes graph view
GPT: Open-source alternative to Roam, community-driven development
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Less mature than some alternatives, features may be less stable
RemNote
No - Limited to internal content
Partial - Includes spaced repetition features
Yes - Supports bidirectional linking
Yes - Offers graph view
GPT: Integrates note-taking with active recall and spaced repetition
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Learning focus might not suit all use cases
There are no rows in this table
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.