Obsidian
Partial - Strong internal search, but limited cross-platform capabilities
Limited - Relies on plugins like Smart Connections
Yes - Strong support for bidirectional linking
Yes - Graph view for visualizing connections
Alex: Powerful and flexible. GPT: Extensive plugin ecosystem, local storage for privacy
Alex: "I've been using it for 2 months and I still don't really get it or find it intuitive." Concerns about spending too much time customizing
Tana
No - Limited to internal search
Moderate - Some AI features, but not as advanced as dedicated AI tools
Yes - Node-based structure supports Zettelkasten principles
Partial - Hierarchical views but no true mind mapping
Alex: "That is kind of what I like about Tana over Obsidian." GPT: Flexible, node-based organization
Alex: Lack of integration and API. GPT: No mobile app, limited AI capabilities
Limited - Strong internal search, weak cross-platform
Yes - Strong AI-driven organization and tagging
Partial - Supports linking but not designed for Zettelkasten
Limited - Basic visualization features
GPT: Powerful AI for automatic organization and surfacing relevant information
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Limited Zettelkasten-style linking, weak visualization
Reflect
Limited - Focused on internal content
Moderate - Some AI-driven contextual organization
Yes - Designed for bidirectional linking
Limited - Minimal visualization features
GPT: Simplicity and focus on daily notes
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Limited customization options
Capacities
Limited - No cross-platform search
Yes - AI-driven linking and tagging
Yes - Strong support for Zettelkasten-style linking
Yes - Visual graph views
GPT: Blend of AI-driven organization and strong linking capabilities
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Limited integration options
Notion
No - Limited to internal search
Limited - Some AI features but not core functionality
Partial - Supports linking but not optimized for Zettelkasten
Limited - Can create basic mind maps
Alex: "Notion seems totally pointless to me." GPT: Flexible, good for collaborative work
Alex: Didn't see the point. GPT: Can be slow with large databases, limited offline functionality
Roam Research
No - Focused on internal linking
Limited - Not a core feature
Yes - Pioneered modern implementation of Zettelkasten in digital tools
Yes - Offers graph view
GPT: Excellent for networked thought and daily notes
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Steep learning curve, subscription cost
Logseq
No - Limited to internal content
Limited - Not a core feature
Yes - Strong support for bidirectional linking
Yes - Includes graph view
GPT: Open-source, privacy-focused, similar to Roam but free
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Less polished UI, steeper learning curve
Athens Research
No - Focused on internal content
Limited - Not a core feature
Yes - Designed for networked thought
Yes - Includes graph view
GPT: Open-source alternative to Roam, community-driven development
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Less mature than some alternatives, features may be less stable
RemNote
No - Limited to internal content
Partial - Includes spaced repetition features
Yes - Supports bidirectional linking
Yes - Offers graph view
GPT: Integrates note-taking with active recall and spaced repetition
Alex: Didn't explicitly mention. GPT: Learning focus might not suit all use cases